Any sympathy for Klingon commander T'Rump?
Wow, even Stephen Colbert can't make the Klingons in Discovery interesting.
Any sympathy for Klingon commander T'Rump?
The problem with analogies to the real world is any such view of current politics is likely to contain bias and misunderstanding.
The UFP is seen as analogous to the modern West, the USA or NATO in particular, but that is problematic, because the UFP is supposed to be relatively utopian, where as NATO and the USA have more baggage than truly self-less, pure, noble and un-self-interested pursuits. Just take NATO, who insisted they were a peaceful pact who in no-way were anti-Soviet (which from the Soviet perspective was suspect, considering they had heard this before from the Anti-Comitern Pact, and also that a number of the NATO countries were the ones who had attacked the Soviet Union by intervening in the Russian Civil War). When Stalin asked to join NATO, the Soviets were rebuffed, thus in the Soviet mind believing that NATO was exposed as an anti-Soviet pact, who were not going to be up to any good in relation to Russia and the other republics. this tension continues today, because although NATO existed supposedly against the Soviet threat, there is no more Soviet Union but there still is NATO. James Baker III (US Secretary of State) and Eduard Shevardnadze, his Soviet counterpart reached an agreement at Jacksonhole that the Soviet Union would not use force to keep the waster bloc propped up and in return the US would not have NATO go pst Berlin, no one inch east. But Germany reunited, and the New Germany was part of NATO, so it went east. Presidents Clinton, GW Bush and Obama all signed more eastern nations into NATO. While I am no fan of the corrupt Russian Federation, it is interesting how the West portrays Russia, Putin in particular, as being the aggressor and hostile (reducing historical process tot he will of one single individual's subjectivity). Yet even as NATO just intervened in Libya, created a civil war still on going, a failed state, a humanitarian refugee crisis, etc, NATO insist they come in peace. The actions of the West are not viewed nor portrayed as being hostile, but if you take a moment to step outside bias, it should be clear why other regimes are frightened of the West.
A Federation truly devoted to peace and justice, would have no problem with readjusting their borders to ease Klingon worries, just like a NATO truly devoted to peace and being a defensive alliance wouldn’t constantly push up against the borders of other powers.
.
The only reason that NATO "pushes up against the borders" of Russia is because nations that border Russia like Poland and the Baltic states are scared as hell of the Russians controlling them again.
Russia has only its past to blame for that fear and thus NATO expansion. I would say the same would apply to the Klingons.
people being forced by coercive relatives into bullying marriages lasting decades, or priests who tell me what to think, and denounce me if my conscious tells me otherwise.
Change Poland with Cuba and Russia with USA and you’ve got exactly the same situation in 1962.
Not at all. The Soviets putting nuclear missiles in Cuba had absolutely nothing to do with the U.S. attempts to overthrow Castro.
The United States wasn't exactly treating Cuba well to begin with by that point.
Castro was worse.
Not at all. The Soviets putting nuclear missiles in Cuba had absolutely nothing to do with the U.S. attempts to overthrow Castro.
Clearly if you are sympathetic, you completely condone any behaviors by that person, race or nation.One should not confuse understanding for condoning. One is entirely capable of thinking Klingons and authoritarian totalitarian regimes are awful people but noting the methods used to combat them can and have been terrible as well. Which is I suspect what we'll get with Section 31 vs. The Klingons.
Clearly if you are sympathetic, you completely condone any behaviors by that person, race or nation.
One should not confuse understanding for condoning. One is entirely capable of thinking Klingons and authoritarian totalitarian regimes are awful people but noting the methods used to combat them can and have been terrible as well. Which is I suspect what we'll get with Section 31 vs. The Klingons.
Has the "Section 31 in Discovery" actually been confirmed onscreen or is it all speculation at this point?
It's all speculation, nothing more. Nobody would have even thought of them in the first place if not for the fact that the Discovery's registry number has 31 in it.Has the "Section 31 in Discovery" actually been confirmed onscreen or is it all speculation at this point?
they were operating as Earth's covert domestic and offworld intelligence service prior to 2151.
And not even Section 31 is THAT sloppy.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.