• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Who do you think was the worst actor among the TNG cast?

From "worst" to "best":

Denise
Wil
Marina
Michael
Jonathan
LeVar
Gates
Brent
Patrick
 
I wasn't a big fan of Sirtis's emotional displays early in the show (for example, "Encounter at Farpoint"). Perhaps those types of scenes were reduced to better accommodate her acting style.

Kor
 
From "worst" to "best":

Denise
Wil
Marina
Michael
Jonathan
LeVar
Gates
Brent
Patrick
Hmmm... I gotta switch a few of those for my tastes. Plus, I'll add a few of the other regulars in the mix too

Denise Crosby
Wil Wheaton
Whoopi Goldberg
Marina Sirtis
Gates McFadden
Levar Burton
Michael Dorn
Jonathan Frakes
Michelle Forbes
Dwight Schultz
John deLancie
Brent Spiner
Patrick Stewart
 
The sad truth is that everything they did wrong with Crosby, they got right with Michelle Forbes. She went away for a while too & they brought her back & it was pretty damn good. She also got a much more believable tough female role, & everything about the part just played better, even though she had much less screen time

Exactly. Yar was a stereotype of what some men think a no-nonsense type of woman is. Ro was done much better.
 
I think some of you are confusing bad acting with actors and/or characters you don't like.

I don't think any of them were bad actors but some were weaker than others. the first two seasons had some bad writing and some of the weakest acting but by then end of the show they were all top notch - or I wouldn't have watched it.

Just about every actor here mentioned I can think of a bad, cringe-worthy episode and acting performance and also one where they did a phenomenal job. By the movies they were really good.

A tangent but I really wish they could have done more TNG movies. Throwing in the DS9 characters would have been awesome too. Ok now I am completely off topic.
Did you watch a different show than the rest of us? Patrick Stewart was nearly always top notch; I'll agree with that. But the rest? No way. There is no way you can convince me that all of them were "really good" in the movies, or even in the last season of TNG.

Marina Sirtis went from overacting to not-bad-occasionally to drawling her lines in a really sloppy way, and I saw no improvement in Gates McFadden's acting, either. Wil Wheaton's best episode was the one in which he left the show, and Brent Spiner just hammed it up in the movies.

Thank goodness they didn't do more movies. They got progressively worse, both in terms of story and in terms of the supporting cast's acting.

DS9 did not need a movie. They'd pretty well wrapped up everything that needed wrapping up in the series. The show that got cheated of a proper ending was Voyager.
 
DS9 did not need a movie. They'd pretty well wrapped up everything that needed wrapping up in the series. The show that got cheated of a proper ending was Voyager.

DS9 most definitely did need a movie. And the plot would have been to have SIsko return from the Prophets as he said he would and to start the next phase of his life. Because the time when he would do this was left open-ended, they could still do the movie, but it would need to be soon, before any of the main cast or important supporting cast dies. They could bring in Voyager characters for that - have Seven of Nine as first officer on the station, for example.
 
DS9 most definitely did need a movie. And the plot would have been to have SIsko return from the Prophets as he said he would and to start the next phase of his life. Because the time when he would do this was left open-ended, they could still do the movie, but it would need to be soon, before any of the main cast or important supporting cast dies. They could bring in Voyager characters for that - have Seven of Nine as first officer on the station, for example.
Sorry, but I honestly never cared about Sisko that much. He had some decent episodes and demonstrated some worthy strategic moves... but was for the most part a pretty boring character.

And given the situation with the Voyager crew - the question of how they would re-integrate not only into post-war Starfleet, but back into the Federation itself, and how Seven would be accepted in a society where a lot of people would only see her as Borg and not as a victim trying to reclaim her humanity - why would she end up on DS9, of all places?
 
Why not DS9? If a movie was done now, it would be more than fifteen years after the end of Voyager and things can change quite a bit in that length of time. Nor would the movie be solely about Sisko and Seven; it would catch up with other members of both shows. Garak could be the leader of Cardassia, Neelix could have found his way to DS9 somehow, back to his old job, having married Dexa, with her and Brax living on the station. Kira could be First Minister - there are so many possbilities!
 
Did you watch a different show than the rest of us? Patrick Stewart was nearly always top notch; I'll agree with that. But the rest? No way. There is no way you can convince me that all of them were "really good" in the movies, or even in the last season of TNG.

Marina Sirtis went from overacting to not-bad-occasionally to drawling her lines in a really sloppy way, and I saw no improvement in Gates McFadden's acting, either. Wil Wheaton's best episode was the one in which he left the show, and Brent Spiner just hammed it up in the movies.

Thank goodness they didn't do more movies. They got progressively worse, both in terms of story and in terms of the supporting cast's acting.

DS9 did not need a movie. They'd pretty well wrapped up everything that needed wrapping up in the series. The show that got cheated of a proper ending was Voyager.

Wow maybe TNG is not for you. Seems like you really dislike it. When I think of bad acting I think of Shatner.

DS9 needed a crossover movie or one with the Dominion War where the big budget could really show off the space battles.

Sisko is my favorite captain so obviously you and I are far apart in our opinions.
 
Wow maybe TNG is not for you. Seems like you really dislike it. When I think of bad acting I think of Shatner.

DS9 needed a crossover movie or one with the Dominion War where the big budget could really show off the space battles.

Sisko is my favorite captain so obviously you and I are far apart in our opinions.
My preferred series are TOS and Voyager. Janeway is a lot more like Kirk than she would ever be willing to admit.

There are some TNG characters I liked and some episodes I liked. But the series overall is just so damn preachy and "Aren't we enlightened and wonderful?". Picard is just so utterly clueless about how people live when they're not in Starfleet or if they're on frontier planets that don't enjoy all the advantages of the core Federation worlds.

I happen to think Patrick Stewart is a terrific actor. It's Picard I don't like that much at times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
Kirk and Janeway are pretty similar made contact with a lot of new species, were rather pragmatic in their idealism.

I also here Mulgrew likes to showboat and is similar in her antics at the convention like Shatner.

Though to give TNG it's due it laid the groundwork that made the worldbuilding of DS9 possible, created the plots, characters, and situations that Voyager would follow on(thematically) and was of course an inspiration on early Enterprise.

TNG makes DS9/VOY/ENT possible without it Trek wouldn't be recognizable.
 
Last edited:
The fact that interesting stories could be told that happen after a series ended doesn't mean the series needs a movie. It just means, we'd have reason to watch a movie were it made.

I'd say Sirtis. I haven't seen her in much else so hard to say if she's a good actor in other roles. She's not super convincing in TNG.
 
Marina Sirtis is not a good actress. It's not the character- it's her. Cate Blanchett could do a good Troi. Meryl Streep could do a good TroI.

Denise Crosby owes her career to her lineage and being attractive in her youth. None of her scenes have the gravitas they required.

Wil Wheaton: a very limited actor. Without "Stand By Me", would he have been considered for Wesley? He couldn't do emotion well.

Jonathan Frakes is another limited actor- it's astonishingly good fortune to have played second fiddle to Patrick Stewart. He improved tremendously and was quite natural by the time of "Generations" however- and does have a likeability factor the above actors lack.

Scenes that stick out:

1) "The Bonding"- where Wesley was prompted by Troi to tell Picard why he resented him. Embarrassing acting by Wheaton!

2) Troi impersonating the horny Officer with that cockney accent, in the briefing room with Data and Picard. Where she does those repulsive facial expressions and wink. Good lord. Oh, and her drunken scene in "First Contact". Cripes!

3) The Yar episode where she rants/cries about it being "Frustrating". Was it "Code of Honor"? Total over acting. Oh- like the court scene in "Encounter at Farpoint". Her acting somehow fit the 80's cheese vibe of Season 1.

As a whole-- "Deep Space Nine" & "Voyager" were MUCH better cast. Nana Visitor and Avery Brooks had a propensity to OVERACT- that's an understatement- but they could act. "Voyagers" cast was pretty much perfect.
But when she was in the briefing room with Data and zoicsrd, imitating the guy she was SUPPOSED to be doing it poorly.
Don't you get it?
Haven't you made fun of someone from work or a spouse or someone, and you "over do it" on purpose?
I liked that scene, I thought it was gone all and seemed real.
 
I always thought that the actor that played Commander Riker wasn't very good. He's always standing like a statue with a bitchface facial expression. I liked him as a character though.
 
Wil Wheaton is a very capable actor. If you want to see him knock a role out of the park, find 'Stand By Me' on Netflix or somewhere. Not only is Wheaton phenomenal in that, it's also just an all around great movie.

As for who was the worst... Nah. Why do we have to fixate on tearing people down? That's not what Star Trek is about.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top