Considering James McAvoy is currently two years younger than Patrick Stewart was in TNG's first season, I think if they were to do a Stargazer series they cast someone else as a twenty to thirty year younger Picard.I would be more interested in a Stargazer series if James McAvoy was still willing to take on the role.
As muct as I love the Enterprise cast, if they were gonna make something in this era, I would want them to do so with an entirely new cast of characters.The Romulan War with ENT cast seems impossible to me. It's been almost 25 years since Enterprise last aired. Maybe something on a different NX ship?
The could do a show/film with the cast & characters set in the 2180s. Not an Era that has been explored. Archer is supposed to be on the Fed Council, IIRC.
25th Century Trek with a fresh ship and crew, no callbacks, no familiar faces. Start fresh where TNG / Picard left off and move forward into the undiscovered country.
What has he done with her exactly? Make her a captain and?Let Matalas do what he's doing with Seven, otherwise let the franchise lay fallow.
Did I make it difficult to follow? Captain Seven show, clearly.What has he done with her exactly? Make her a captain and?
Marinate in memberberries some more? Pass.Let Matalas do what he's doing
Marinate in memberberries some more? Pass.
No. It's an absolute based on the fact Matalas has said that's exactly what Legacy is going to be were it ever to happen.Is this an absolute simply by having a character reprise their role from a previous show?
I think the bigger question is why is Matalas the only way forward? What is it that he has said or done with Seven that excites people?Is this an absolute simply by having a character reprise their role from a previous show?
I think the bigger question is why is Matalas the only way forward? What is it that he has said or done with Seven that excites people?
I get that Seven appeals for many reasons but what does Matalas actually offer?
Well, sure and I imagine much of the appeal for fans is a lot of interest in Seven. What made me question this to be Matalas specific was this post:I can very well seeing a Legacy/Seven show (taking away all the variables from the buy-out, of course) where Matalas is too busy to be anything more than a producer as others take the charge. I think the people on the screen are really the bigger overall draw than the people behind. Especially to the general fan who has no idea what a Matalas even is, which I bet is the majority.
And the interesting proposal that it's Matalas or nothing. So why just Matalas?Let Matalas do what he's doing with Seven, otherwise let the franchise lay fallow.
So Matalas or nothing? No thanks.Let Matalas do what he's doing with Seven, otherwise let the franchise lay fallow.
Zero plus zero still equals zero. Plopping Seven (or any fanfave character) into the captain's chair and calling it a "show" or a "direction" is still a big fat nothingburger.Did I make it difficult to follow? Captain Seven show, clearly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.