And in 1989 Trek's idea of the duration for travel across the galaxy was still in fuzzy territory.
And in 1989 Trek's idea of the duration for travel across the galaxy was still in fuzzy territory.
Smart move. Honestly, as much as I enjoy technical manuals, the hand wringing over the fuzzy Trek logic is not worth the heartburn.Trying to make everything sound scientifically accurate is not only a Quixotic task but a waste of time. It's Star Trek, not Cosmos with Neil deGrasse Tyson.
So, Star Trek fans?It's science fiction set in a universe where most aliens look humanoid and speak English. Treating Trek like a college lecture on gravity and physics is just setting the bar too high.
Good roommates, who occasionally talk or share the same place. That's about it.I learned long ago not to be like one of those fans. It's a franchise where you turn people into energy patterns and reassemble them in one working piece.
Reality and Star Trek are at best casual friends.
It's science fiction set in a universe where most aliens look humanoid and speak English. Treating Trek like a college lecture on gravity and physics is just setting the bar too high.
Considering how they got together (Sybok mind drug) are you really surprised?TFF gets the character beats right(except for Scotty and Uhura's out-of-left-field romance that is never again referenced).
Voyager. It is my first and greatest love.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.