• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Which episode(s) would you de-canonise?

I like that at least some of your logic focused on episodes that made no sense within the Star Trek universe, rather than just listing off episodes that suck. I hate that these threads usually devolve into "this episode isn't canon b/c I don't like it!"
Thank you. :techman:
 
I like that at least some of your logic focused on episodes that made no sense within the Star Trek universe, rather than just listing off episodes that suck. I hate that these threads usually devolve into "this episode isn't canon b/c I don't like it!"
Thank you. :techman:

As the topic title is not 'what do you consider canon' , just 'which episode would you decanonise?', saying that you would decanonise an episode because you really dislike it, is perfectly valid in my opinion.

I agree that this thread shouldn't devolve into people declaring something isn't canon just because they dislike it.
 
What about TOS - "Amok Time"? Sure, it's a seminal episode on Vulcans, but why does a species dedicated to logic have forced marriages that can be dissolved by legalized killing?
 
I like that at least some of your logic focused on episodes that made no sense within the Star Trek universe, rather than just listing off episodes that suck. I hate that these threads usually devolve into "this episode isn't canon b/c I don't like it!"
Thank you. :techman:

As the topic title is not 'what do you consider canon' , just 'which episode would you decanonise?', saying that you would decanonise an episode because you really dislike it, is perfectly valid in my opinion.

I agree that this thread shouldn't devolve into people declaring something isn't canon just because they dislike it.

As you say it's all canon for better or for worse. It's just meant to be a little light hearted fun as to which episodes we wished they had never made. And it's no suprise really that a some episodes are mentioned more than others.

Sure I'm not keen on "Force of Nature" it's one of the episodes I've only seen a couple of times. And yes it has structural flaws in it's story telling as civilliations have no doubt been using warp drive/affecting subspace for millenia. But I guess over time subspace could have repaired itself as civilisations rose and fell. But it was rather heavy handed with the enviromental message.
 
TNG "Parallels" not because of its quality but because of the conundrum it introduced with regards to time travel. :lol:
 
What about TOS - "Amok Time"? Sure, it's a seminal episode on Vulcans, but why does a species dedicated to logic have forced marriages that can be dissolved by legalized killing?

Apparently the official answer to that is "biology", it seems their emotions are so out of control during the Pon Farr that it makes something like that necessary. Before they had their culture of logic and stoicism they actually almost always killed each other to win mates.

Just one of the reasons Vulcans are my least favorite (major) Star Trek aliens.
(The other reasons are the whole "purging of emotions" thing and their ugly, uniform haircuts :vulcan:)
 
^And I don't see the mystery involved; physicists have hypothesized for several years that every possible outcome is realized in an alternate universe. "Parallels" gave us a chance to see some of these outcomes up close and personal.

--Sran
 
The one with the "oh no Warp engines are damaging subspace" plot.

I knew that would come up. I happen to like the theme of that episode, although it does challenge the utopianism of Star Trek, but given the current rapidly degrading situation with the environment now compared to then, maybe the moral of technology having unintended consequences is worth more than protecting the magical utopianism of Trek.
 
Though not technically episodes, I would go for all the TOS movies except TMP. I would also de-canonize Generations.
 
The one with the "oh no Warp engines are damaging subspace" plot.

I knew that would come up. I happen to like the theme of that episode, although it does challenge the utopianism of Star Trek, but given the current rapidly degrading situation with the environment now compared to then, maybe the moral of technology having unintended consequences is worth more than protecting the magical utopianism of Trek.
+1
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top