I quite clearly said it wasn't limited to Eastern philosophy, but there is nothing in Western philosophy that even remotely comes close to being as clear and unambiguous an analogue. What imagery Western religions contribute is just that, imagery. The Force works nothing like the self aware mythical beings of the JudeoChristian tradition, that's a pretty laughable assertion to be honest.
This sounds like a bias against the Christian influence in the
Star Wars series. The all-important concept of temptation as presented in the series is not based on any Eastern belief; iIt is handled in a clearly Christian fashion about how, why and the consequences of temptation (and redemption) as defined in Christian scripture. In addition to the other references mentioned earlier, Lucas uses more Biblical influence in a literal sense in
Revenge of the Sith, with the lava lakes of Mustafar took much except the Separatists' headquarters in part from Revelation 20:13-15--
“And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire" which is reserved for the unrepentant. In SW terms, its Anakin, who--despite Kenobi's pleas--is completely dedicated to spiritual corruption as a Sith, and receives what would be his eternal punishment not just from Obi-Wan's attack, but being burned alive by that lava lake--a condition he would suffer with for the rest of his life.
Even the series' most famous reference to the force--the expression
"May the force be with you" is based on the line from Numbers 6:24,
"May the Lord bless you and protect you" as well as the ancient saying,
"May the Lord be with you." There's nothing reaching or ambiguous about any of it.
It was also never stated in the OT that he was hidden away because of his inherent abilities, merely that he was hidden away from his father.
Not quite....
"The Emperor knew, as I did, if Anakin were to have any offspring, they would be a threat to him."
There are many parallels for such political gambits throughout history, with Luke representing a politically important figure as much as a force user. Stating from the OT that he was hidden away because of an inherent aptitude for the force is projection based on knowledge of what we later learned.[/quote]
That's right: in the OT, it is made clear (by Obi-Wan) he and his sister were hidden because of their unique status/connection to the force. This did not, nor did it ever apply to random, faceless millions, but the rare, fairy tale/mythical heroes.
Yes, "you must learn", not "only you can possibly learn" ad it is A way, not THE way. That mistake was the very hubris which led to the downfall of the Jedi, the failure to grasp that the force is something larger than they are, something beyond their teachings. They are simply one group using one method of interacting with the force in a galaxy full of beings doing it without their training.
The O/PT did not tiptoe around how the force was accessed, used and understood. Nowhere in those 6 films did anyone--Jedi or Sith--say accessing / using the force was something any random person could do. Special individuals were located and trained, but their numbers were finite, as that level of force potential was not common.
Not really. It's the difference between "The Force is strong in my family" as opposed to "The Force is strong in everyone." One of these was said in the OT; the other wasn't.
...and the one that was said--
"The force is strong in my family"--was written to continue hammering home the point that the Skywalkers were unique in relation to accessing/using the force--a family who changed a galaxy over and over again, first with Anakin's soul corruption aiding in the birth of the Sith-controlled empire, and his children being the key threats to opposing that / restoring morality/justice to the galaxy. As said time and again, that was not the ability of any random person, not Han, Tarkin, Lando, Mon Mothma, Motti, Greedo, Jabba, Biggs, Piett, Wedge, Chewbacca, Lobot, Wicket, Owen and Beru Lars, Boba Fett or anyone else in that series.
Star Wars was patterned on (among other influences) the traditions of the unique hero being the one born to either lead the way to salvation (historically, in the form of Christ), or the leader defending a nation and/or having larger than life exploits (Arthurian myth traditions) which are undeniably defining traits of Luke, not everyone in the universe.