• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

When the Grammar Nazi's strike!

^I spent months scoring a Texas High School exam, where student after student wrote that fences in Texas were all made by a Mr. Bob Wire.


Give me strength...
 
^I spent months scoring a Texas High School exam, where student after student wrote that fences in Texas were all made by a Mr. Bob Wire.


Give me strength...

*sob* God bless Texas! :biggrin:

texas-flag.jpg
 
^I'll bet anything that the phrase "hunker down" shows up in a textbook next year.

HISD at its finest.
 
There is only one response when they show themselves..

One must wait for a heroic champion to save us.

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6KXgjLqSTg&feature=feedwll&list=WL[/yt]
 
Probably the same guy who came up with the movie title Who Framed Roger Rabbit. (No question mark.)

That's not a mistake. The title is meant to be a statement, not a question. (It's also supposed to be bad luck for a movie title to end in a question mark.)
Oh. Like How the West Was Won or What the Butler Saw? Well, it still sounds like a question to me.

No, those last two would be declarative phrases - the words "this is" are understood to be at the beginning of those titles.

FWIW, the original novel on which Who Framed Roger Rabbit is based, Who Censored Roger Rabbit? by Gary Wolf, has the missing question mark in its title.

On the topic of eggcorns, the use of "irregardless" drives me up the wall.
 
Irregardless is just ignorant. It doesn't sound like regardless.

While we're on the titles of things, let's talk tenses. How unpoetic would have been the song "Lie, lady, lie" by Bob Dylan? Or how successful would "Honey I shrank the kids" have been?
 
Irregardless is just ignorant. It doesn't sound like regardless.
“Irregardless” is a conflation of “regardless” and “irrespective,” resulting in an unintentional double negative.

While we're on the titles of things, let's talk tenses. How unpoetic would have been the song “Lie, lady, lie” by Bob Dylan? Or how successful would “Honey I shrank the kids” have been?
One can allow for colloquialisms and a bit of grammatical leeway in pop culture. Although I still cringe when I see the title of Sheryl Crow’s song “Everyday Is a Winding Road.” It’s “every day,” dammit. Two. Fucking. Words.
 
Last edited:
One can allow for colloquialisms and a bit of grammatical leeway in pop culture. Although I still cringe when I see the title of Sheryl Crow’s song “Everyday Is a Winding Road.” It’s “every day,” dammit. Two. Fucking. Words.

Possibly something confined to the British Isles, but Alexandra Burke's song Broken Heels annoys me. The title of the song appears in several lines which all use this construction:
"You know I can do it better than you, I can do it even better in broken heels"
That doesn't mean what she thinks it means. She means '... I can even do it better in broken heels'. What she says is that she does 'it' better with broken heels than without them, which makes no sense at all.
What makes it even worse is the correct version would fit fine.
 
Apologies if this was covered earlier in the thread...but here's one that drives me INSANE.

It's always "more kittens" or "more snow," but it's "fewer kittens" and "less snow."

Lately I am seeing this in commercials, where you see "less" attached to a countable noun. You canNOT use "less" for countable nouns. "Less" is for non-countable nouns. Back to the snow example--it's "fewer snowflakes," because you can count the individual snowflakes, but "less snow."

If you ever go to Starbucks, check out the message printed on their napkins.

It actually says "LESS NAPKINS."

This is a major, publicly traded company making this mistake every day of the week. I've also seen nationally televised ads that do the same thing. SO annoying!

THANK YOU! My hubby makes this mistake all the time---in front of his boss, his clients and even my parents. All of these people are very well-educated academics and professionals (he works at a University) and I see them flinch, or smile to themselves, whenever he does it. I keep trying to get him to see the difference, but he doesn't get it. Sadly, I think a lot of the professors don't take him seriously (he's staff) because of his poor grammar. He has a very limited vocabulary (unless you're talking about computers), keeps adding extra prepositions where he doesn't need them and can't write a simple invitation without asking me or someone else to proofread it for him.

He's extremely intelligent, but his poor language skills, I'm afraid, make people think otherwise.


was he dyslexica or had some other learning issues as a child?

when i actually take a grammar class i do well but, it goes away soon after.
unlike my issues with reading that i was able to over come is just have big problem with certain language skills.
if i am writing something important i will go and get help with proofreading.

Now the bizarre part is that people will bring me something they are working on to see how it flows.
I ' am pretty decent at being able to tell if the point is being made or if the wording is awkward. Moreso with sometthing written by someone else then me.

:lol:
 
Well, that's true of everybody. It's always a good idea to have someone else proofread your stuff.
 
. . . Now the bizarre part is that people will bring me something they are working on to see how it flows.
I am pretty decent at being able to tell if the point is being made or if the wording is awkward. Moreso with something written by someone else then me.

:lol:

"More so" is two words.

TWO . . . FUCKING . . . WORDS!!

The spelling as one word is becoming increasingly common, however, and may well be accepted as standard ten or twenty years from now.

But that doesn't mean I have to like it.
 
I don't have any problem with it. That's just the natural evolution of language. Which was the probably-too-subtle point of my last Post. :rommie:
 
was he dyslexica or had some other learning issues as a child?

Dyslexic? He was never diagnosed, but I'm fairly certain he is. He even thinks he is. If it's not about numbers or programming, he's fairly lost.

I'm the opposite. I can handle anything, as long as no numbers are involved. :lol:
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top