• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What's in YOUR 'head canon'?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seasons 1 and 2 of TNG are taking place in a different timeline as the other seasons.

The changes that define later TNG happen because of the temporal cold war.
 
So anyway, in my head canon, inspired by the other thread, is that Starfleet is indeed a military, it's just that the definition of military has changed over the centuries, so that it would look differently than what we have now.

It's the same how there used to be no police, but citizens, then troops, then guards, then sheriffs, and now to our present system; that is, as society changed and morphed, so did the institutions, laws, culture, and needs around it and the means to maintain order.

----

Also, to that end, in my head canon, thanks to post-scarcity, widespread education, an emphasis on accountability, and a more even distribution of resources, the Federation does not have mass incarceration. Sure, it has penal colonies (like Tom Paris) and jails for basic order, but no prison system nearly as large (ratio-wise to the population, that is), bureaucratic, or profit-driven as anything we have here. Hey, we've never seen giant Federation prisons on the scale or purpose of Oz or even Orange is the New Black in any Trek show or movie.
 
Actually, the future that some fans describe, with massive unemployment and aimlessness and people looking for enlightenment, I could easily see incredibly high crime rates and social problems and drug use.

Billions of people with really nothing to do except get into trouble.

You could decriminalize most offenses, or ship vast numbers off to penal colonies/penal planets (therefor "no crime").
 
In my head canon, the external appearance of the NX-01 in These are the Voyages, was actually the Drexler NX-01 refit. Since the Enterprise external shots never appear on screen in that episode, there's nothing to contradict it.
 
Once Earth becomes 'full' human colonies are out to give them a challenge. What did Kirk say to Cochran in the TOS episode 'humanity on thousands of planets and spreading out'. Either that was hyberbole or he was close to the truth.
 
The tribble McCoy tested Khan's blood on was still on the Enterprise when it crashed on Altamid. It survived and escaped from the saucer section and bred, so there's now an ever-growing population of tribbles there.
And now there are millions of Super megalomaniac Tribbles, planning to take over the galaxy. Twenty five years later the USS Reliant passes by....
 
It was alive on the Enterprise for over 4 years in that case, the entire interior space should have been filled with them.
 
I'm guessing it would have been carefully fed very little so as not to encourage it to procreate. Heck, maybe McCoy neutered it or gave it regular contraceptives.
 
The Khan blood made it sterile, consider all those years on Ceti Alpha V and Prime Khan never bred with Marla
 
Actually, the future that some fans describe, with massive unemployment and aimlessness and people looking for enlightenment, I could easily see incredibly high crime rates and social problems and drug use.

Billions of people with really nothing to do except get into trouble.

You could decriminalize most offenses, or ship vast numbers off to penal colonies/penal planets (therefor "no crime").

This is why I made sure to add accountability in there. Irresponsible people in Trek (at least, irresponsibility stemming from sloth) are a vast minority; even civilians who have little to do with Starfleet operations end up being pretty ambitious, like Joseph Sisko's restaurant, or freighter captains, or various civilian scientists. That's not to say that a world with minimal prisons or no police means a system of rampant misbehavior and no accountability at all; we clearly see wrongdoers getting punished in Trek, it's just not as widespread as today because sense of accountability is developed, through community or concern for the next person or other means. Their social order is built on fulfillment of personal goals. Order isn't maintained through brute force and threats of violence, but through the collective sense of conscience and empathy (taught through parenting, education, friends, family, neighbors, etc), with law enforcement (whatever that may truly look like in this era) complimenting instead of substituting that sense. The systemic root problems of crime would be removed.

You wrong someone or you break the law, you get punished, obviously. We've seen that in Trek many times over. Nothing wrong with that. What we haven't seen is mass incarceration and incarceration for the sake of profit rather than order, both of which is extremely damaging today both to the fabric of society and to the drain of resources (which, in turn, perpetuates class and race divides, rather than promoting unity, stability, and rehabilitation). On the contrary, we've seen people in Trek serve their time, but the big difference here is that prison time helps rehabilitation, perspective, and even remorse and actively working to make up for their misdeeds to society, whereas modern-day incarceration means stigmatization and heavy debt, and thus huge difficulty in getting honest work or social support, which often leads to repeat crime or destabilization of communities (and thus higher crime rates). The Netherlands and Sweden are good examples of showing how a different approach to prison thanks to plentiful resources can happen. In the US, Naperville, IL -- which invests much more in its social programs than neighboring suburbs -- is not only wealthier (thus more resources), but also has a lower crime rate (even though criminals could easily come from those suburbs and Chicago), and is seen as a positive model of police reform as an adaptation to the social factors outside the police itself.

In my head canon, I believe whatever system of law enforcement and justice they have, is more invested in restorative justice rather than strictly punitive like most of today, because the motivations between both systems would be vastly different based on the needs of the future.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top