• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What was "The Burn" and what caused it?

Technically, we don't know how long the Enterprise took to get to Vulcan because Kirk was unconscious.
Still, its not impossible that scanning the Narada would have given Starfleet far better knowledge into building much faster propulsion.
Starfleet sensors were quite detailed and there was nothing to suggest that they cannot scan the interior of the Narada... especially with Kirk's father ramming his ship (which likely brought down the shields and/or incurred moderate to heavy damage - enough for the shuttle survivors to scan the ship in detail and then get away).
My guess it took less than a day, why would Nero with his advanced mining ship take more than a day to destroy Vulcan and Starfleet, the rest of the fleet was in the Laurentian system and did not have time to show up.
 
Vulcan is 17 light-years from Earth or thereabouts so I could imagine a Kelvin Timeline starship getting there in less than a day at maximum warp.
 
Well, as long as we set up our expectations to avoid disappointment that's a victory. :shrug:

I don't think it is asking too much to have a coherent plot that doesn't fall apart at a glance. They have some truly great actors that the writing has let down time and again, I hope that changes this season.
 
I don't think it is asking too much to have a coherent plot that doesn't fall apart at a glance. They have some truly great actors that the writing has let down time and again, I hope that changes this season.
I don't either but going in to it expecting it to fall apart is just...I don't know what to describe it other than strange. :shrug:
 
I don't either but going in to it expecting it to fall apart is just...I don't know what to describe it other than strange. :shrug:

I'm hopeful that it doesn't. But Discovery's plots over two seasons haven't exactly been solid, so I don't think it is outlandish to hold one's proverbial breath until they can prove that they can do a solid season long arc and stick the landing. The show has fooled me before.

The one thing that did impress me to a degree was that the dialogue was much sharper than it has ever been. Hopefully it carries over to the other episodes.
 
For the same reason why Qo'noS was 80 hours away from Earth even with the warp drive technology of 2151. Because they wanted to get Klaang kidnapped as quickly as possible and have the NX-01 be close enough to Klingon space to provide added tension.
Sounds about right. In TMP Kirk said V'Ger was fifty-three point four hours away from Earth (after leaving Klingon space) and managed to meet it about half way.
 
Well the Genesis device was never seen again, maybe it was followed by the Exodus device, then the Leviticus device all the way to the Revelations device.
The Burn will be explained, along with The Fire and the Smoke

I just need The Burn to be interesting and well thought out enough to hang their story arc on. As far as the Genesis Device goes, Protomatter made it into Deep Space Nine.
 
The burn will be a means to and end, like finding Khan recognising Chekov, and a Starfleet science ship not noticing a whole planet was missing

We should still want it to make sense. Seriously, how many complaints have we had over the years over the Reliant missing that a planet was missing on this very board? It gets mentioned in almost every thread related to TWoK. Because they screwed something up in the past shouldn't give them license to not think through how their plot devices work in the here and now.

I could be completely wrong, and I hope I am.
 
Interesting is still interesting to me. If they don't stick the landing then they don't. Doesn't take value away from an interesting idea.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top