• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What Set Was Missing Fron TOS?

What other interesting Enterprise set do you think should have been designed, built, and used in the production, and what would its function be?

I think the bridge should've had some type of emergency exit other than the turbolift. Maybe slide Kirks' chair to the side, pop open a hatch and exit the bridge via a Jeffries tube.

MarsWeeps,

I remember seeing a blueprint of TMP bridge that showed access to the deck below located underneath the Helm/Nav Console. I don't remember if the Helm/Nav Console moved out of the way to get access to this panel or not.
I checked the www.cygnus-x1.net website for this blueprint but I could not find it there.

^^ The Franz Joseph plans show a stairway to the bridge, as well as a toilet behind one of the panels flanking the main viewscreen.

Hey, when you gotta go, you gotta go.


Encino Vampire (Scott Pens?),

You are correct. Here is a link to the Franz Joseph (Schnaubelt) blueprint of TOS bridge from "The Star Fleet Technical Manual", courtesy of the cygnus-x1.net website.


Navigator NCC-2120 USS Entente
/\

I think the "pull-open hatch doors on the floor of the bridge" in front of the Helm/Navigation console are found on the "Main Bridge" diagram in the book "Mr. Scott's Guide to the Enterprise."

mrscotts1.JPG
 
Last edited:
. . . Encino Vampire (Scott Pens?) . . .
My regular username is scotpens. Close enough. You can imagine how some people spell it. ;)

. . . Well, $1 million in 1987 would have been about $285,001.70 in 1966 according to this inflation calculator. That would be a little bit more money than the most expensive regular episode of the original series cost -- "The City on the Edge of Forever" at $245,316 -- but less than either of the two pilot episodes ("The Cage" cost $630,000 and I don't have the cost of "Where No Man Has Gone Before" on hand).
Here’s the cost breakdown of “Where No Man Has Gone Before,” scanned from The Making of Star Trek. According to the book, production ran $12,000 over budget.

wnmhgb-budget.jpg
 
Last edited:
To make the Enterprise a more realistic space vessel...

1: She needs an airlock
2: We need to see something other than Auxiliary Control being used for "stellar cartography"
3: We need to see the "under hangar" area where presumably shuttlecraft (and other vehicles?) are stored and serviced (and possibly dismantled/assembled?)
4: We need to see an ENT "Minefield"-style spacewalk
5: There really ought to be a TOS-style travel pod deployed at some point

To see the Enterprise as a more clearly defined vessel of science and other work...

1: We need to see more science labs and similar work areas
2: It would be great to see Uhura visit her work crew in the Cryptography Room
3: How about showing a TOS version of a holodeck / visicom?
4: I would love to see Captain Kirk walk from the Bridge through an auxiliary exit to a staircase leading to a "ready room" like Pike had, presumably on Deck #2.
5: Anyone for seeing a cargo bay?
6: Enlisted facilities on the lower decks, for the grunts

And another, fond wish...

A functional 22-man transporter room!
 
Last edited:
Another thing I would have loved to see, had TOS been continued/revived in some way...

More exploration of K-type space stations (like K-7 seen in "The Trouble with Tribbles") and other station types, both as independent weigh-stations and as Federation Starbases, for the Enterprise to visit as ports of call. It would have been great to see a very loosely serialized story arc where to Enterprise is dispatched to a specific frontier and a specific station (or stations) become port(s) of call while Kirk and company visit nearby worlds on an important mission.

It would also be great to experiment with both indoor "fake planet" sets (which TOS did so well) and outdoor location shoots (also done to great effect) to show working expeditions or colonies (ones that have not been destroyed).
 
Here’s the cost breakdown of “Where No Man Has Gone Before,” scanned from The Making of Star Trek. According to the book, production ran $12,000 over budget.

Cool. Thanks for that. That book is so full of information I forget what's in there. It would be interesting to compare those numbers with the ones presented in Inside Star Trek as well as the Roddenberry papers that were donated to UCLA.
 
. . . Encino Vampire (Scott Pens?) . . .
My regular username is scotpens. Close enough. You can imagine how some people spell it. ;)

. . . Well, $1 million in 1987 would have been about $285,001.70 in 1966 according to this inflation calculator. That would be a little bit more money than the most expensive regular episode of the original series cost -- "The City on the Edge of Forever" at $245,316 -- but less than either of the two pilot episodes ("The Cage" cost $630,000 and I don't have the cost of "Where No Man Has Gone Before" on hand).
Here’s the cost breakdown of “Where No Man Has Gone Before,” scanned from The Making of Star Trek. According to the book, production ran $12,000 over budget.

Do we know if this budge was standard for all episodes? Or inflated/deflated b/c it was for a pilot?
 
Both of the pilots had inflated budgets. I'd have to look through some things to estimate what the average budget for a regular episode was, though. The one listed for "The City on the Edge of Forever," as I indicated, was the most expensive regular episode produced in all three seasons.
 
Why would "City" be one of the most expensive eps?
The NYC filming was done on a backlot. I'd think location shooting would add more to the cost. There weren't a lot of effects to film. There wasn't a very large guest cast to pay. Was The Guardian donut really that expensive?
 
Average budget for the first two seasons was around $186,000 per episode (bottle eps obviously cost less, those with locations or new set pieces quite a bit more).
 
Both of the pilots had inflated budgets. I'd have to look through some things to estimate what the average budget for a regular episode was, though. The one listed for "The City on the Edge of Forever," as I indicated, was the most expensive regular episode produced in all three seasons.
Why would "City" be one of the most expensive eps?
The NYC filming was done on a backlot. I'd think location shooting would add more to the cost. There weren't a lot of effects to film. There wasn't a very large guest cast to pay. Was The Guardian donut really that expensive?
That’s a good question. All the exteriors were shot on the Forty Acres lot where other episodes like “Return of the Archons” and “Miri” were filmed. The Giant Lopsided Time Bagel was a fairly large piece to build and had practical lighting effects, but I can’t imagine it costing that much.

IIRC, the original pilot “The Menagerie”/“The Cage” cost around $600,000. “Where No Man Has Gone Before” came in at about half that amount.
 
According to the Department of Physics of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, T'Girl (a.k.a. Dracula's Castle) is correct (notwithstanding a complication discussed below):

You asked about placing water in a vacuum. Liquid water will boil if its vapor pressure is greater than the ambient air pressure. In a vacuum, liquid water will start to boil regardless of what the temperature is. Turning water from a liquid to a vapor takes 540 calories per gram, and this heat is taken from the liquid water, cooling it off. In a vacuum, the water will continue to boil until so much heat has been removed that the remaining water will freeze. This is a very quick way to freeze water.

I'll call this situation the thought experiment: gravity is on, and the water out of which the rink will freeze is in a tank with only the one planar surface on top exposed to vacuum. The water boils off that surface, until what's left in the tank freezes.

This behavior is confirmed by a NASA experiment, but there is an additional complication, which is that when the water left in the tank freezes, it flash freezes all at once and suddenly expands. In the NASA experiment (described in a detailed treatment for the International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, at http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/uploads/docs/300119.pdf), this sudden freezing of the entire volume of water caused the resulting block of ice to hop out of its pan! So, some system would have to deal with the sudden expansion of the whole rink when it flash freezes. Perhaps having a large enough body of water, under gravity, and in a flexible container would mitigate the popping out effect; if not, I'd suspect the ice rink might fracture when it flash freezes.

But that's talking about an enclosed chamber that's had the air sucked out of it. The water doesn't have anyplace to go. If it's in the shuttlebay and the doors are opened, then fwoomp, it's gone.


Not if you didn't "throw the doors open." Maintain the artificial gravity, reduce the pressure to zero through venting to space (expose to space), and as posted above the lack of air pressure would turn the liquid water into a solid.

Well, yes, but the proposal included opening the bay doors. The problem is that TV and movies lie to us about what happens when you open an airlock to space. The common image is a torrential wind that lasts for up to several minutes. Nuh-uh. It's called explosive decompression for a reason. It blows out all at once, very quickly. The force and speed of it would likely be too great to allow any water to remain.



Cant see Kirk having a ready room, never really liked the idea, he was a hands-on captain rather than wanting to lock himself away from the crew. What's wrong with conducting the ships business from your quarters anyway?

The fact that his quarters are five decks away from the bridge. It's a good idea for the captain's office to be right next to the bridge, even if he rarely uses it.


To make the Enterprise a more realistic space vessel...
...
4: We need to see an ENT "Minefield"-style spacewalk

That would make it less realistic, not more. Why are they in freefall walking around on the top of NX-01's saucer when there's gravity plating just a few feet below them? What is it with SF shows and movies that they think ship hulls could somehow be opaque to gravity (or that gravity is like sound and only works in an atmosphere)?
 
But that's talking about an enclosed chamber that's had the air sucked out of it. The water doesn't have anyplace to go. If it's in the shuttlebay and the doors are opened, then fwoomp, it's gone.

True, obviously you wouldn't "just throw the doors open", unless you wanted the surface of your rink to be something other than flat. I believe I also said that the possible cracking of the rink when it flash-freezes is another reason why the method might not work, and I offered a much more promising alternative.

But none of this changes the fact that arguing that the vacuum is a really good insulator does not bring enough factors to the table to understand what will happen.

A couple of inches of water, expose it to space and repressurize, and the crew would have a ice skating rink.

No, because the water would get sucked out into vacuum along with the air. And because it's a myth that stuff instantly freezes in vacuum. Vacuum is actually a fine insulator (as anyone with a thermos bottle should know firsthand). There's virtually no material medium to conduct or convect heat away, so things lose heat a lot more slowly in vacuum than in air.

The vacuum may be a good insulator, but the vapor pressure of liquid water ensures that evaporation will occur while the water is still liquid. (If it weren't for this loss of energy from the evaporation, one could stop the analysis upon realizing that the vacuum is a good insulator.) Evaporation lowers the temperature of the liquid that remains. That process will continue until the liquid flash-freezes, and it won't take long either, though exactly how long depends on the specifics. That's what happens, even to a blob of water jiggling around weightless in the vacuum, regardless of how good an insulator the vacuum is. Even water vapor crystallizes in a vacuum, and that happens almost immediately.
 
The vacuum may be a good insulator, but the vapor pressure of liquid water ensures that evaporation will occur while the water is still liquid. (If it weren't for this loss of energy from the evaporation, one could stop the analysis upon realizing that the vacuum is a good insulator.) Evaporation lowers the temperature of the liquid that remains. That process will continue until the liquid flash-freezes, and it won't take long either, though exactly how long depends on the specifics. That's what happens, even to a blob of water jiggling around weightless in the vacuum, regardless of how good an insulator the vacuum is. Even water vapor crystallizes in a vacuum, and that happens almost immediately.

All that may be true, but it doesn't change the fact that once the doors are opened, the water on the hangar deck floor is not going to stay there because of the huge explosive force of the evacuating atmosphere sucking it into space -- along with any shuttles, equipment, and anything else that isn't bolted down. Maybe even some things that are bolted down, since an explosive decompression of that magnitude would make a hurricane seem like a light breeze.
 
There's another missing set that TOS could've benefitted from:

An isolation ward section of Sickbay. As in ENT, a landing party needs a secluded spot adjacent to Sickbay where injured, and possibly infected or irradiated/poisoned landing party personnel can be quarantined for brief periods after returning to the ship. It would be interesting if Sickbay included a "decontamination" facility like this, possibly with a small, two- or three-man transporter alcove to beam up injured parties.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top