• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What religion/faith are you?

What Religion are you part of?

  • Atheist

    Votes: 83 43.0%
  • Christian

    Votes: 60 31.1%
  • Jewish

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Muslim

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mormon

    Votes: 2 1.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 20 10.4%
  • Agnostic

    Votes: 23 11.9%
  • Hindu

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • Buddhist

    Votes: 2 1.0%

  • Total voters
    193
As a general note, I wish the people who oppose my ideas were capable of more than just saying "You're wrong." often followed by a smiley and an accusation of being emotional about it. Right now I feel like I am taking candy from a baby and that's definitely wrong!!!
 
There's nothing passionate about this. I couldn't care less if anyone "appreciates" my reasoning or not. However, you oppose arguments with arguments not with "appreciation". I thank you for your... condescension.:rolleyes:
As a general note, I wish the people who oppose my ideas were capable of more than just saying "You're wrong." often followed by a smiley and an accusation of being emotional about it. Right now I feel like I am taking candy from a baby and that's definitely wrong!!!
Hi, fellow atheist here. ^^^ This ^^^ is not a good look. Just FYI.
 
I'm a member of the Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids. For me, Druidry is more a philosophy than religion. I fall somewhere in the gray area between agnosticism and belief and will likely give you a different answer as to where I am precisely on that spectrum on any given day.
 
I'm a member of the Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids. For me, Druidry is more a philosophy than religion. I fall somewhere in the gray area between agnosticism and belief and will likely give you a different answer as to where I am precisely on that spectrum on any given day.

So you don't believe that mistletoe has to be cut with a golden sickle in order to retain its magical powers?
 
I'm a member of the Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids. For me, Druidry is more a philosophy than religion. I fall somewhere in the gray area between agnosticism and belief and will likely give you a different answer as to where I am precisely on that spectrum on any given day.

I've always enjoyed reading John Michael Greer's works.
 
. What in hell is a first mover, not moved by anything else?

Well, quite. Whatever First Cause these arguments supposedly prove the exisence of, assuming it's even a coherent concept, seems a long way removed from a sentient megabeing that takes an active interest in human affairs.
 
Last edited:
Atheist.

The Universe doesn't allow for a God IMO and thank fuck for that. Any God who would allow such shit to occur on a daily basis would be a massive C**T in my eyes.
 
If there is a God we are dependent on him for the very air we breathe, the clear blue sky, the gentle sun, our health, our wealth, our family and food. And he can take anyone of those things away just that like. And he wouldn't be unjust to do so.
 
So correct me if I'm wrong, but in your view a parent could murder their child and be just to do so?
 
The evidence for atheism is no more conclusive than the evidence for monotheism, polytheism, or pantheism.
Why should I need to provide evidence for not believing in deities, spirits, supernatural mythic beings, etc.? If I'm expected to believe in something, show me the evidence it exists or that it's at least plausible according to known scientific principles.

Atheism is what you get when people opt not to go with the supernatural.

I have, for some time, regarded atheism and fundamentalism as opposite sides of the same coin: both demand that a miracle, in order to qualify as a miracle, involve a gross violation of the laws of physics.
In my experience, fundamentalists don't worry about the laws of physics. They either deny they exist or they just make them up to support whatever they're talking about.

Which is why I say that the laws of physics are the greatest miracle of all, and why I also say that both fundamentalists and atheists are "looking for God in all the wrong places."
The thing about the laws of physics is that they work irrespective of whether there are any lifeforms that understand them or have even thought about them at all. Humans won't be around forever, and after our species is gone, the laws of physics will still work just fine. They don't need us.

And no, I am not looking for any gods. Been there, done that, and with every religion in history insisting that they are the only true explanation, it occurred to me that they can't all be right. And the more I learned about how the universe works, I concluded that none of them are right. They were all created by humans, out of humans' need for explaining what they considered unexplainable.

Well, some of those things are either now explained, or are becoming more explainable as we learn more. It would be nice if the religions of the world would catch up accordingly.

No; lack of a belief regarding a supreme being is the very definition of agnosticism. Atheism, by contrast, is the belief in the nonexistence of a supreme being.
Wrong.

Agnostic is a bit of an I'll defined grey area.. And many sub definitions.. One is a belief of miracles while another is not..
It's all personal, believe what you want to believe, as I've said in other threads.. 7 billion other heathens in the world. Be nice to each other.
my one caviot.. Don't prothalitze or push me to any opinion.. This includes atheism.. If I want to know more , I'll find you
That's how I feel about Mormons, JWs, and anyone else who leaves pamphlets in my mailbox, knocks on my door, tries to get me to buzz them into my apartment building (solicitors aren't allowed here, and these nuisances never think it applies to them as well), starts preaching to me at bus stops, or judges me by whether or not I go to church.

Funny how not one person who has done the above intrusive activities has been atheist. We don't "prothalitze" people (the word you're looking for is "proselytize"). Atheism is not a religion.

I'm an atheist not because of what I believe, but because what I don't believe.
When I have to fill out a form, and they ask religion, I don't write "atheism", I write "none".
Unfortunately, many forms don't have that option. Even the poll for this thread doesn't have that option. Atheism is not a religion, and I have written this in the comment section on the long-form federal census I had to fill out a few years ago.

So what is the purpose of time?
To keep everything from happening simultaneously.

In no way does that lead to such a conclusion. But I appreciate your passionate proselytizing on behalf of atheism. :lol: This thread is a nice way to see what beliefs are represented, but there's a noticeable push against a certain set of beliefs in God.
:rolleyes:

Believe whatever nonsense you want, but keep it out of the legislation, courts, hospitals, schools - emphasis on science and health classes, pharmacies, and my doorstep. And if you're a YEC, stop driving and using anything made of plastic or other fossil fuels. By their "logic", such things don't exist.

And would someone please correct the spelling in the poll. It's "atheist" not "athiest."
 
Of course not. That's not the analogy I'd use for the mankind-God relationship.
But you said that we have no claim on something that was never ours to begin with. No creature created themselves or the world in which they were placed. If God took away our air and sun, we are as dead as that theoretical murdered child.

If I built a shelter for homeless people and then one year after they all moved in I burnt it to the ground, would I be just in that action?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top