There's nothing passionate about this. I couldn't care less if anyone "appreciates" my reasoning or not. However, you oppose arguments with arguments not with "appreciation". I thank you for your... condescension.![]()
Hi, fellow atheist here. ^^^ This ^^^ is not a good look. Just FYI.As a general note, I wish the people who oppose my ideas were capable of more than just saying "You're wrong." often followed by a smiley and an accusation of being emotional about it. Right now I feel like I am taking candy from a baby and that's definitely wrong!!!
Hi, fellow atheist here. ^^^ This ^^^ is not a good look. Just FYI.
I'm a member of the Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids. For me, Druidry is more a philosophy than religion. I fall somewhere in the gray area between agnosticism and belief and will likely give you a different answer as to where I am precisely on that spectrum on any given day.
I'm a member of the Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids. For me, Druidry is more a philosophy than religion. I fall somewhere in the gray area between agnosticism and belief and will likely give you a different answer as to where I am precisely on that spectrum on any given day.
I'm a recovering Catholic. It's a 12-step program of non-belief... i.e. atheism.
So you don't believe that mistletoe has to be cut with a golden sickle in order to retain its magical powers?
I've always enjoyed reading John Michael Greer's works.
. What in hell is a first mover, not moved by anything else?
Prey tell, why not?
Why should I need to provide evidence for not believing in deities, spirits, supernatural mythic beings, etc.? If I'm expected to believe in something, show me the evidence it exists or that it's at least plausible according to known scientific principles.The evidence for atheism is no more conclusive than the evidence for monotheism, polytheism, or pantheism.
In my experience, fundamentalists don't worry about the laws of physics. They either deny they exist or they just make them up to support whatever they're talking about.I have, for some time, regarded atheism and fundamentalism as opposite sides of the same coin: both demand that a miracle, in order to qualify as a miracle, involve a gross violation of the laws of physics.
The thing about the laws of physics is that they work irrespective of whether there are any lifeforms that understand them or have even thought about them at all. Humans won't be around forever, and after our species is gone, the laws of physics will still work just fine. They don't need us.Which is why I say that the laws of physics are the greatest miracle of all, and why I also say that both fundamentalists and atheists are "looking for God in all the wrong places."
Wrong.No; lack of a belief regarding a supreme being is the very definition of agnosticism. Atheism, by contrast, is the belief in the nonexistence of a supreme being.
That's how I feel about Mormons, JWs, and anyone else who leaves pamphlets in my mailbox, knocks on my door, tries to get me to buzz them into my apartment building (solicitors aren't allowed here, and these nuisances never think it applies to them as well), starts preaching to me at bus stops, or judges me by whether or not I go to church.Agnostic is a bit of an I'll defined grey area.. And many sub definitions.. One is a belief of miracles while another is not..
It's all personal, believe what you want to believe, as I've said in other threads.. 7 billion other heathens in the world. Be nice to each other.
my one caviot.. Don't prothalitze or push me to any opinion.. This includes atheism.. If I want to know more , I'll find you
Unfortunately, many forms don't have that option. Even the poll for this thread doesn't have that option. Atheism is not a religion, and I have written this in the comment section on the long-form federal census I had to fill out a few years ago.I'm an atheist not because of what I believe, but because what I don't believe.
When I have to fill out a form, and they ask religion, I don't write "atheism", I write "none".
To keep everything from happening simultaneously.So what is the purpose of time?
In no way does that lead to such a conclusion. But I appreciate your passionate proselytizing on behalf of atheism.This thread is a nice way to see what beliefs are represented, but there's a noticeable push against a certain set of beliefs in God.
So correct me if I'm wrong, but in your view a parent could murder their child and be just to do so?
But you said that we have no claim on something that was never ours to begin with. No creature created themselves or the world in which they were placed. If God took away our air and sun, we are as dead as that theoretical murdered child.Of course not. That's not the analogy I'd use for the mankind-God relationship.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.