davejames said:
Wow, that's a great looking design!
Although to be honest (and I'm probably the only one who feels this way) I don't think it really goes far ENOUGH for the purposes of this movie. It still screams "1960s" to me.
I'm expecting something that retains the basic shape but looks more like what we would call futuristic today, just like TMP gave us a more 1980s-inspired ship.
Because I hate to say it, there are things designed by Apple now that look more futuristic than the original Enterprise.![]()
I'd daresay that was the general idea... like David ngc said, it's like seeing the Enterprise clearly for the first time after putting one's glasses on.davejames said:
Wow, that's a great looking design!
Although to be honest (and I'm probably the only one who feels this way) I don't think it really goes far ENOUGH for the purposes of this movie. It still screams "1960s" to me.
Cary L. Brown said:
A few things there I don't personally care for...the addition of the "lump" reactor housing on the underside of the nacelle) but overall, I like what ya've done.
Samuel T. Cogley said:
Does anyone else despise the term "connie" as much as I do?
davejames said:
Although to be honest (and I'm probably the only one who feels this way) I don't think it really goes far ENOUGH for the purposes of this movie. It still screams "1960s" to me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.