Not fond of the music either: it’s pretty much a medley of other Trek compositions (with even a few passages lifted from Star Wars -or, I guess, Holst, and even the Orville!)
I did an analysis last year when the title sequence popped up, trying to identify where each bit was taken…I could find very little that was NOT taken from somewhere else!It's a kind of pastiche of “heroic space opera music”, sure. But “lifted”? I don't see — or rather: hear — it.![]()
Yeah, and in my opinion that's exactly the problem with this show and that's basically also why I didn't like it all to much. It's not meant to be taken seriously, BUT at the same it is an official ST show that is part of the canon. And that's what I don't like about it, because this means that what we see in this show does actually happen in this universe. And to me it's simply not imaginable that a Starfleet Ship can have such characters who are adults but talk and behave like children nearly all the time. This applies also to the Captain, Number One etc., it seems that nobody is taking anyone or anything seriously.“More comedic”? It's a full-on comedy. It's not meant to be taken too seriously at all.
And? They likely had orders to observe and not engage, and the minute those orders were no longer applicable, their first priority was to retreat.They flee the borg...
Really? Starfleet has had its share of problematic officer and personnel in all the other shows, be they people overwhelmed by the job like Barclay, general troublemakers like Edward Larkin, or the scores of renegade Captains and Admirals. Is it really so hard to believe in an organization that includes such people would also include people like the officers and crew of the Cerritos?Because what we see here from a Starfleet ship and its crew contradicts basically anything we see in the other shows.
Canon doesn't mean strict literalism of what happens. Only that events and characters happen. Since LD is a comedic show then there is going to be exaggeration for the sake of the story. So, yeah, they are not going to take most things seriously. That's the framing device.Yeah, and in my opinion that's exactly the problem with this show and that's basically also why I didn't like it all to much. It's not meant to be taken seriously, BUT at the same it is an official ST show that is part of the canon. And that's what I don't like about it, because this means that what we see in this show does actually happen in this universe. And to me it's simply not imaginable that a Starfleet Ship can have such characters who are adults but talk and behave like children nearly all the time. This applies also to the Captain, Number One etc., it seems that nobody is taking anyone or anything seriously.
Don't get me wrong, I'd be perfectly fine with a comedy show that approaches ST in a funny way and I get why so many people are perfectly entertained by LD. But then, please don't make such a show canon. Because what we see here from a Starfleet ship and its crew contradicts basically anything we see in the other shows.
as I wrote above, the problem is context, or lack thereof. You can justify it in many way, but the intention is to play cowardice for fun.And? They likely had orders to observe and not engage, and the minute those orders were no longer applicable, their first priority was to retreat.
I have no problem with such people included, as long as they are single characters like Barclay as you say. But as for LD, the whole Cerritos crew seems to be like that, or at least the main characters. Literally ALL of them, and that's the issue I personally have. And the worst thing is that this also applies to the leading officers.Really? Starfleet has had its share of problematic officer and personnel in all the other shows, be they people overwhelmed by the job like Barclay, general troublemakers like Edward Larkin, or the scores of renegade Captains and Admirals. Is it really so hard to believe in an organization that includes such people would also include people like the officers and crew of the Cerritos?
Then I have or had another conception of being canon, I actually always thought that being canon means exactly what you point out it doesn't.Canon doesn't mean strict literalism of what happens. Only that events and characters happen. Since LD is a comedic show then there is going to be exaggeration for the sake of the story. So, yeah, they are not going to take most things seriously. That's the framing device.
Being canon doesn't mean take things perfectly seriously.
And that's completely fair. IDIC and all that. For me, there are always dramatic conceits to the fact that this is put on a screen, as a TV show. A big one would be in "The Menagerie" and Spock walks off frame with Pike in his hover chair and Kirk turns to see Pike reunited with Vina. There's barely a few seconds of time passed yet Spock got down to the transporter room, got Pike transported, he has his physical body back in the Talosian illusion and is with Vina.Then I have or had another conception of being canon, I actually always thought that being canon means exactly what you point out it doesn't.
The problem is that the scene is taken totally out of context and just to make them look bad. In context it could make sense.
I agree, I also viewed this sequence (and actually each other in the opening sequence) as an intended move to present the Cerritos as incompetent which is meant to be funny.as I wrote above, the problem is context, or lack thereof. You can justify it in many way, but the intention is to play cowardice for fun.
Because what we see here from a Starfleet ship and its crew contradicts basically anything we see in the other shows.
as I wrote above, the problem is context, or lack thereof. You can justify it in many way, but the intention is to play cowardice for fun.
That's a Starfleet officer's first duty, right? To die stupidly?So the Cerritos should have stayed and been destroyed like a good Starfleet ship, even when it is clearly outmatched?
I agree completely. Would it have been a Pakled ship -as long as you recognized it as such- it could have been funnier, especially as the Pakled were later overturned as a worthy foe.BUT I also have to say that for this purpose they shouldn't have chosen a space battle against the Borg. I mean, I got what they wanted to express, but fleeing from a Borg Cube is actually not cowardish or makes you look incompetent. The Borg are among the most dangerous beings (are they "beings"? Maybe an interesting question to be disussed elsewhere ^^) in the ST universe and I always viewed a Borg Cube as one of the most dangerous things you can come across in space, even with a fleet to back you up. And then, we see more than one Borg Cube in that sequence battling against not such a high number of federation/allied ships. To emphasize their point better, in my opinion they should have shown the Cerritos against one single, quite small and not dangerous looking space ship - one phaser beam from this ship and the Cerritos flees
Same here.Still, I find this sequence quite impressive and well and beautifully made from a technical and artistical point of view.
Sorry but this is beyond the point. I just don’t find that showing the crew of the Cerritos as incompetent and coward is funny nor that it actually reflects what has been going on in the series.So the Cerritos should have stayed and been destroyed like a good Starfleet ship, even when it is clearly outmatched?
Sorry but this is beyond the point. I just don’t find that showing the crew of the Cerritos as incompetent and coward is funny nor that it actually reflects what has been going on in the series.
Sorry, I can't see this without thinking of Men in Black.For every "best of the best of the best, sir!"
Sorry, I can't see this without thinking of Men in Black.![]()
as I wrote above, the problem is context, or lack thereof. You can justify it in many way, but the intention is to play cowardice for fun.
And I still don't see how avoiding a fight with the Borg is "cowardice." Sounds more like common sense to me.I just don’t find that showing the crew of the Cerritos as incompetent and coward is funny nor that it actually reflects what has been going on in the series.
And? Not everyone in any given organization are going to be professionals and the very paragon of virtue and perfection. Starfleet has its bad apples, and it's not unheard of that a majority of them would end up on the same ship. If anything, it makes more sense that these type of officers would end up on one of the less prestigious ships than on one of the front line ships.I have no problem with such people included, as long as they are single characters like Barclay as you say. But as for LD, the whole Cerritos crew seems to be like that, or at least the main characters. Literally ALL of them, and that's the issue I personally have. And the worst thing is that this also applies to the leading officers.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.