• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers What are your unpopular Sci-Fi & Fantasy Opinions?

The Living Daylights is my favorite 007 movie too and I'm glad to see that that's not an unpopular opinion here!

For my unpopular 007 opinions:

Regardless of the merits of his performance, I find all of Sean Connery's 007 movies to be incredibly dull. I would gladly take any of Roger Moore's films over even the best of Connery's.

Daniel Craig is a dour, joyless thug that has absolutely no business playing James Bond. All of his movies are unwatchable except for Casino Royale. I would be anxiously counting the days until his departure if I weren't convinced that the next one will be just as bad. (I wish they would bring back Pierce Brosnan. He's even sexier now that he's older.)

I thought Ben Affleck was a pretty good Daredevil in the directors cut of Daredevil the movie.

I spent most of the 2000s touting the merits of Ben Affleck's Daredevil to anyone who would listen.... which was nobody. But you get my point. :D

The Star Wars prequels are as good as the sequels

I'll go one further. Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith are the best movies in the entire franchise, even surpassing the original trilogy.

Wonder Woman is the worst DCEU film

Up until Birds of Prey came out, this was true.

Also, Suicide Squad is the best DCEU movie.

If The Crystal Skull was made a few years after The Last Crusade people would have enjoyed it as much as the other Indiana Jones movies. The long wait created an image of what Indiana Jones SHOULD be according to overhyped fanatics no movie could live up to.

I think there's something to that. I think the other problem is that, due to the evolution in filmmaking techniques & styles over the years, it was impossible for Spielberg to make an Indiana Jones movie in 2008 look like the movies from the 1980s.

I don't know how unpopular this is, but Spielberg hasn't made a good movie since Saving Private Ryan in 1998. Tim Burton hasn't made a good movie since Big Fish in 2003. And Ridley Scott only ever makes good movies by accident.

There was nothing wrong, demeaning, or otherwise problematic about the resolution to Donna Noble's story on Doctor Who

I never heard any significant complaints about the end of Donna's story in the first place. The ending was fine with me, if perhaps a bit overwrought. But, with the exceptions of Martha & Nardole, nearly every companion departure on the new series has been like that.

My unpopular Doctor Who opinions:

David Tennant is incredibly overrated.

Clara is a great companion. I loved the way that she constantly kept the 12th Doctor in check.

Here's my biggest one: "Chronicles of Riddick" is an excellent science fiction film and doesn't deserve the panning it gets by so many.

When I first saw The Chronicles of Riddick, I didn't get it. It wasn't until I saw David Lynch's Dune a few months later that I finally understood the visual language of The Chronicles of Riddick. There's something about the visual language of the interiors of the Necromonger ship that don't make sense without using Dune as the missing link.

Tron: Legacy is an underappreciated movie.

Agreed. Unfortunately, I've never seen another movie that loses so much of the magic of the experience by not seeing it on the big screen.

While I enjoyed Firefly and it might have had potential, it deserved to be cancelled.

I think that may be a bit harsh. I don't think that it deserved to be cancelled. But, contrary to what the Browncoats say, it's not the only series to be unjustly screwed over by its network. Even if we're confining it to early 2000s FOX shows with Jewel Staite, I'd argue that Wonderfalls got screwed over way worse. (At least Firefly got to air 11 of its 14 episodes. Wonderfalls got shitcanned after only 4.)

Ishtar was a fun and enjoyable movie.

Please remain where you are. The men in white coats will be with you shortly. ;) (Seriously, I don't think you could make a worse movie if you tried.)

Speaking of bad movies, I don't hear people say this very often, but I think that "Manos" The Hands of Fate is a great set-up for a horror movie and I think that there are all sorts of possibilities for a sequel or remake if made by competent filmmakers.

Jesse Eisenberg and Jared Leto's respective versions of Lex Luthor and The Joker were great and should be brought back in some capacity

Eisenberg's Lex Luthor never bothered me but I'm not a big fan. But I adore Jared Leto's Joker. IMO, he's the best live action Joker we've ever had, even better than Ledger.

Blake's 7 was really good.

*crickets chirp*

It still hasn't gotten an official Region 1 DVD release, so I can neither confirm nor deny that statement. :(

Red Dwarf Series I is better than any other season except for maybe Series IV.

Luke Skywalker's depiction in Star Wars: The Last Jedi is the best thing about an otherwise mediocre movie. He's not a coward who ran away. He's a man who can't get over the one horrible mistake he made and now he's just trying to not make anything worse. It may not be overtly heroic but it's the best thing that he can think of.

Joker is a depressing, ugly exercise in miserableism. I resent having to see it just to stay current in the conversation. I wish I could slide into an alternate universe where it was never made.

2001: A Space Odyssey is a great 30-minute short film buried in mountains of indecipherable stoner crap. (I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks this but I think it merits saying given how many top 10 sci-fi movie lists I've seen that put this in the #1 or #2 spot.)

Blade Runner is dull, pretentious, unwatchable drivel. And, somehow, Blade Runner 2049 found a way to be even worse.

Rob Zombie's 2007 Halloween remake is better than the John Carpenter original.

While not as good as the original, the remake of The Prisoner is interesting in its own right. I even find myself quoting Ian McKellen's Number 2 occasionally. "In. Out. More. Village."

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was perfectly fine and I don't understand why everyone seemed to hate it so.

The Mystery Science Theater 3000 revival is too slick and lacks the homemade charm of the original. Also, the revival was completely unnecessary in a world where Rifftrax and Cinematic Titanic exist.

TMNT (2007) is very underrated and it's absolutely criminal that it never got a sequel.

I love the Keanu Reeves Constantine movie, although I'm aware that I never read the comic book, so I don't mind the changes, which would probably annoy me to death if I had.

As misguided as it often is, I prefer Zack Snyder's juvenile grimdark DCEU over subsequent attempts to Marvel-ize it. I love the MCU too, but we already have that so we don't need another one.
 
I think that may be a bit harsh. I don't think that it deserved to be cancelled. But, contrary to what the Browncoats say, it's not the only series to be unjustly screwed over by its network. Even if we're confining it to early 2000s FOX shows with Jewel Staite, I'd argue that Wonderfalls got screwed over way worse. (At least Firefly got to air 11 of its 14 episodes. Wonderfalls got shitcanned after only 4.)

I'm curious, what was the general consensus on Dollhouse? That series got one more season than Firefly, but it was cancelled just as it was starting to get good. Also, I thought the cast of Dollhouse was better than the Cast of Firefly (And I like Firefly). I just don't hear much anger about Dollhouse as I do about Firefly, and that was another show that Fox cancelled a bit early.
 
I'm curious, what was the general consensus on Dollhouse? That series got one more season than Firefly, but it was cancelled just as it was starting to get good. Also, I thought the cast of Dollhouse was better than the Cast of Firefly (And I like Firefly). I just don't hear much anger about Dollhouse as I do about Firefly, and that was another show that Fox cancelled a bit early.

Compared to Firefly, Buffy, & Angel; Dollhouse just didn't have that trademark Joss Whedon wit, so it never garnered quite the same devoted following.
 
General Chang was the best villain in the Star Trek movies series.

Benedict Cumberbatch's role as Khan Noonien Singh was underwhelming.

Doctor Who is overrated.

The Matrix has been the most ground breaking modern sci fi movie series in the last 21 years.
 
Thanos is a shitty villain.
I'd agree if you are strictly speaking of the movies. I grew up on Starlin's Thanos and his scenes of Thanos' love for the Death avatar, and the religious cult built around him was a great ongoing backstory.
 
Last edited:
I wasn’t sure to include Bond films, as it usually goes in TV & media. But as it’s been included here, mine are as follows:

Lazenby is better than Moore and was the most convincing Bond in fight scenes until Craig cake along
Moore should’ve retired after TSWLM (though has they followed it with For Your Eyes Only, rather than Moonraker, he could’ve stayed on, done that one and had a pretty good run)
Brosnan is a better Bond than Dalton
The first half of Die Another Day is excellent
Spectre is better than Skyfall
 
Battlefield Earth was a fun movie.
The Martian was great until the stupid mutiny which was only topped by the still more idiotic blow up the back of the ship and ridiculous Iron Man scene.
Any Star Trek series can only be considered progressive compared to the decade that preceded production.
Wonder Woman needed to be turned into Xena Warrior Princess to be marketable on the big screen.
 
Two more comments, related to Dollhouse and James Bond:
* Dollhouse has Joss Whedon's best writing of any series he's done

* Quantum of Solace is Daniel Craig's best outing as Bond
 
Last edited:
The Star Wars OT is not great. It's entirely unworthy of it's legendary status. The PT was utter shite but the sequel trilogy was hugely enjoyable.
 
When I first saw The Chronicles of Riddick, I didn't get it. It wasn't until I saw David Lynch's Dune a few months later that I finally understood the visual language of The Chronicles of Riddick. There's something about the visual language of the interiors of the Necromonger ship that don't make sense without using Dune as the missing link.
Interesting idea. I think it worked for me because I saw it on the heals of Lord of the Rings and just figured it was trying to evoke that more fantasy style but in science fiction.
Seriously, I don't think you could make a worse movie if you tried
Are we referring to science fiction films?
Luke Skywalker's depiction in Star Wars: The Last Jedi is the best thing about an otherwise mediocre movie. He's not a coward who ran away. He's a man who can't get over the one horrible mistake he made and now he's just trying to not make anything worse. It may not be overtly heroic but it's the best thing that he can think of.
Completely agree.
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 was perfectly fine and I don't understand why everyone seemed to hate it so.
Same.
 
I was just going to say that. I love the stuff with him getting tortured by the North Koreans and the sword fight. It isn't until they get to the ice hotel that the whole thing starts to fall apart.
Exactly. The first half is almost as close as they dared to get to the Craig-style of Bond. And I love the nods to the earlier movies, the fact that he pretends to be an ornithologist (Fleming took the name James Bond from the author of a book on birds of the Caribbean) and the “our man Flint”-like scene where he slows his own heartbeat to feign death.

Plus there’s a great line where they’re scanning his body and someone says “liver shows signs of damage” and the other commentator goes “definitely him, then.”
 
I haven’t seen all of GOT but I’ve seen enough to know I don’t think it’s that great. There are just too many damn characters and plot lines for me to understand what’s going on.

Regarding Doctor Who, I really only like series 5-7. You just can’t beat the awesomeness of Eleven, Amy, Rory, River, and yes, even Clara.

Getting through the LOTR trilogy was a struggle.

I don’t like Tony Stark/Iron Man. Sure he has a fun dry sense of humour but as a character he’s pretty boring. Same goes for his movies.

That’s all I got for now.
 
Logan is a thoroughly average and overlong movie whose feints toward pretension ("there's no living with a killing") are entirely hypocritical (just look how awesome it is to see him finally going full R-rated berserk!). Its weird subplot about mutant-suppressing corn is a lame alternative to mutants being straight-up hunted, and not bringing back Liev Shreiber for the peaceful family interlude is a head-banging missed opportunity. (Add to this baffling decisions/plot holes like driving a bullet-riddled car up to a fancy downtown hotel rather than hiding in a discreet, out-of-the-way motel.) Anyone who calls it "one of the best superhero films ever" very likely simply dislikes the genre in general.
 
-Any fight between Batman & Superman should only take about a fraction of a second and should end with Batman in a coma

-Seven & Ace are the best Doctor Who team

-The Shining (both the book & movie) is very light on story

-The Daleks are overrated, one dimensional and boring

-The Joker is overrated, one dimensional and boring

-Ghosbusters is a perfectly fine 80s comedy but has no business being a franchise

-Multiverses and alternate realities are overused

-Enterprise is pretty good
 
Batman v Superman is actually a pretty good film if you watch the extended edition, which fills in a lot of blanks that make the final cut a bit lacklustre.

The endings of Battlestar Galactica and Lost are both great and pack some real emotional punches.

Deadpool is a hugely overrated character and only works in small doses.

X-Men: Apocalypse and X-Men: Dark Phoenix are both decent films with strong casts and solid action sequences.
 
Logan has great cinematography and a fantastic central performance from Jackman; for me, it echoes John Wayne in The Shootist or Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven - it has been earned by the actor’s history and legacy. Jackman, Stewart and Marchant work so well together. But Richard E. Grant’s bad guy belongs to an altogether inferior film (and I love REG), huge chunks of the film make no sense and the storyline with the family is weirdly reminiscent of the arc with the elderly couple in the much-maligned Wolverine (did nobody think of this during pre-production or production?).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top