• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What Are the Ways the Star Wars Prequels Could Be Improved???

The thing about movie directors is that they're typically very keen on being the ones in charge of the creative side of things. Very few of the really good ones are willing to invest time and effort that could be spent doing their own projects into someone else's.
This is a very fair point.
 
Episode 1 had quite a lot of practical stuff. It was episode 2 and 3 that jumped the gun.

Even then they still used a lot of miniatures in both those movies.
 
More practical effects, less green screen.
You know, people keep mindlessly blurting out this tired old criticism and seemingly always in utter ignorance of the fact that the prequels used a *ton* of practical effects. Some of the largest and most detailed miniatures ever made were built for these movies.
With a few notable exceptions, most of the green screen work was for set extension, which is just the modern equivalent of the old matt paintings.

I do wish that instead of pure digital characters they'd gone for a more hybridised technique with on-set makeup and puppetry enhanced with digital effects (GMT's 'Hellboy 2' & 'Pan's Labyrinth' are still the gold standard for this IMO) but realistically, they were inventing the technology as they went along, just like with the original movies. Seriously, go back and watch other CG effects heavy movies from 1999 to 2004 and you'll see very few of them hold up even half as well as the Star Wars prequels.
 
Last edited:
Ah, this thread is still alive.

Here's another one. With all respect to Christopher Lee, I think Dooku should have been played by a younger actor, maybe someone in his early 60s.

Kor
 
You know, people keep mindlessly blurting out this tired old criticism and seemingly always in utter ignorance of the fact that the prequels used a *ton* of practical effects. Some of the largest and most detailed miniatures ever made were built for these movies.
With a few notable exceptions, most of the green screen work was for set extension, which is just the modern equivalent of the old matt paintings.

I do wish that instead of pure digital characters they'd gone for a more hybridised technique with on-set makeup and puppetry enhanced with digital effects (GMT's 'Hellboy 2' & 'Pan's Labyrinth' are still the gold standard for this IMO) but realistically, they were inventing the technology as they went along, just like with the original movies. Seriously, go back and watch other CG effects heavy movies from 1999 to 2004 and you'll see very few of them hold up even half as well as the Star Wars prequels.
Phantom Menace used a bunch of practical stuff. The next two, not so much.
 
Phantom Menace used a bunch of practical stuff. The next two, not so much.
Have a look at that video again. There's plenty of stuff from episodes 2 & 3. All the featured Coruscant buildings from Padme's tower to Dex's diner, the Geonosian area, the tree cities on Kashyyyk, the Utapau sinkhole (in several scales!), that entire lava valley in Mustafar, the city on Kamino and the Felucian jungle plus of course the Jedi Temple (multiple interiors and exterior models) all leap to mind.

Sure, there was a lot more green screen work too, but that's mostly a matter of production practicalities and the sheer scope of what they were doing. Unless you know a location where they could have filmed people flying through an ecumenopolis? Or an underground droid factory safe enough to shoot a complex, fast moving action scene without the actors or camera crew getting decapitated?
 
Last edited:
I don’t like how all the clone troopers were CG, I don’t think they made a single set of physical armour, even for the scenes with removed helmets.

Though for Ep3 they did mo-cap actual soldiers according to the commentary.
 
I don’t like how all the clone troopers were CG, I don’t think they made a single set of physical armour, even for the scenes with removed helmets.

Though for Ep3 they did mo-cap actual soldiers according to the commentary.
Agreed. The scenes with Cody on the Star Destroyer and later down on Utapau always grate on me. I get Lucas wanted to keep things simple from a production standpoint, but the motion tracking technology just wasn't there yet and it looks like Morrison's head is just floating on top of the armor and the movements of his shoulders just don't line up.

I mean how hard would it have been to get a bunch of stunt performer's who are approximately the same height and build of Temuera Morrison? It would have probably been doable with only a dozen or so, with combined multiple passes with the same people moved around to make a reasonable sized crowd for the foreground and kept the CG troopers for the mid-to-background.
 
I don’t like how all the clone troopers were CG, I don’t think they made a single set of physical armour, even for the scenes with removed helmets.

Though for Ep3 they did mo-cap actual soldiers according to the commentary.
They didn't. This was very much a CG driven boundary pushing project.
 
You know, people keep mindlessly blurting out this tired old criticism and seemingly always in utter ignorance of the fact that the prequels used a *ton* of practical effects. Some of the largest and most detailed miniatures ever made were built for these movies.
With a few notable exceptions, most of the green screen work was for set extension, which is just the modern equivalent of the old matt paintings.

I do wish that instead of pure digital characters they'd gone for a more hybridised technique with on-set makeup and puppetry enhanced with digital effects (GMT's 'Hellboy 2' & 'Pan's Labyrinth' are still the gold standard for this IMO) but realistically, they were inventing the technology as they went along, just like with the original movies. Seriously, go back and watch other CG effects heavy movies from 1999 to 2004 and you'll see very few of them hold up even half as well as the Star Wars prequels.

Totally agree with all this. The amount of stuff in the prequels that WASN'T CGI is way more extensive than you think. It's a lazy criticism of these movies in my view. I think they're all still pretty stunning looking films considering their age, and show a load more creativity in the environments and visuals than TFA. I can still get as good a visual feast out of them as most modern blockbusters even now. And they boast far superior scores to boot.

I think the prequels are way too underrated and get a lot of undeserved hate in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
1. A better actor for young Anakin.
2. More implications that Padme was actually taking advantage of Anakin and had some mental/dark issues of her own.
3. Padme survives, takes the twins to Alderaan. Anakin is rebuilt as Vader, and then Palpatine tells him that to purge himself of his weakness and prove his loyalty, he must kill the wife of Skywalker. Vader tracks her to Alderaan, lands on the balcony outside of her quarters in the rain, where he is confronted by Jar-Jar, and they fight with Jar-Jar desperately trying to talk him out of it and fighting hard, while Vader seems like his heart isn't in it. He does kill Jar-Jar, though, and then goes inside, but looks like he regrets what he just did. Padme is nursing baby Luke, and we saw before Vader arrived that a nursemaid had taken Leia from the room shortly before Vader's arrival. Vader sees Luke, pauses, and then tells Padme, "Padme Skywalker is dead. Be sure that my master never has reason to believe otherwise." He turns and leaves, with Padme calling for Ani not to leave. He pauses once, at the door, and then goes.

#3 above is from "spoilers" that someone who was supposedly a Lucasfilm insider on another board shared before ROTS came out. I've always thought it would have been better than what we got.
 
I think the prequels are way too underrated and get a lot of undeserved hate in my opinion.

It's certainly not *all* undeserved. I just think that of all the things to criticise about those movies, the technical side of things (VFX, sets, costumes, music, sound design etc.) is not one of them.

1. A better actor for young Anakin.

You say that like they didn't audition and screen test hundreds of kids, but just picked Jake Lloyd at random.

2. More implications that Padme was actually taking advantage of Anakin and had some mental/dark issues of her own.

"Anakin went bad because a woman done him wrong"? Seriously? Leaving aside the heavily implied misogyny; how would that even remotely fit into the story?

3. Padme survives, takes the twins to Alderaan. Anakin is rebuilt as Vader, and then Palpatine tells him that to purge himself of his weakness and prove his loyalty, he must kill the wife of Skywalker. Vader tracks her to Alderaan, lands on the balcony outside of her quarters in the rain, where he is confronted by Jar-Jar, and they fight with Jar-Jar desperately trying to talk him out of it and fighting hard, while Vader seems like his heart isn't in it. He does kill Jar-Jar, though, and then goes inside, but looks like he regrets what he just did. Padme is nursing baby Luke, and we saw before Vader arrived that a nursemaid had taken Leia from the room shortly before Vader's arrival. Vader sees Luke, pauses, and then tells Padme, "Padme Skywalker is dead. Be sure that my master never has reason to believe otherwise." He turns and leaves, with Padme calling for Ani not to leave. He pauses once, at the door, and then goes.

All of that sounds awful and astonishingly, even more melodramatic, hackneyed and poorly conceived than the cringe-fest they actually ended up making.

#3 above is from "spoilers" that someone who was supposedly a Lucasfilm insider on another board shared before ROTS came out. I've always thought it would have been better than what we got.
So in other words: "almost certainly complete and utter horseshit."
 
You say that like they didn't audition and screen test hundreds of kids, but just picked Jake Lloyd at random.
I say that as though, whatever process they used, I don't care, because it ended with a terrible choice.
"Anakin went bad because a woman done him wrong"? Seriously? Leaving aside the heavily implied misogyny; how would that even remotely fit into the story?
No, no, no. More like the age difference and his naiveté leading to a teacher/student relationship kind of thing. Obviously she had some sort of damned problem - normal people don't immediately respond to their boyfriend violently mass murdering people including children by holding and comforting him. And it would be a side character thing for Padme, not the reason he went bad. Or at least, nowhere nearly the main reason.
So in other words: "almost certainly complete and utter horseshit."
Well, yeah, definitely. :D

You seem to express your opinions on this rather strongly and rudely, as though they were more important than those of others in some way other than subjectively, to yourself. Iz zat you, Mr. Lucas? :razz:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kor
It's certainly not *all* undeserved. I just think that of all the things to criticise about those movies, the technical side of things (VFX, sets, costumes, music, sound design etc.) is not one of them.
When they served the story, absolutely. Well, even when they didn't, it was still pretty to look at ;)
 
The short:
Better dialog.
Smaller shots with less obvious green screen, not every scene needed to be so "dense" as Rick McCollum (sp) put it in the documentary.
No Padme, Anakin falls to the dark side because he becomes frustrated with how the Jedi seem to be reactive to things instead of proactive, starts to believe he can do it better himself (stress that more), make the audience buy into that he REALLY believes he is bettering the galaxy by his actions instead of some corny line at the end. Actually, the Jedi should have refused to participate in the Clone Wars, this would have made it interesting because you could have had Anakin get all hotheaded and run off and try to play the hero, and Obi-wan has to go after him to bring him back, and Obi-wan winds up helping him (and the Clones, win a major battle) on the condition that Anakin return with him, or something.
A more likable Anakin, esp. in the first two movies (see: better dialog) make us root for him more instead of cringe when he speaks of hating sand.
More Deathsticks. :)
Really, most of the problems stemmed from "Better Dialog" Lucas really should have had established writers working with him to better the lines and the humor.
Have some time to show how Dooku became a Sith Lord, so you can see how Palpatine played him (conversational flashbacks of him being recruited by Palpatine, etc.) before he is killed off in the final film.
No Jesus birth for Anakin. Shimi was forced to sleep with one of her former masters, and we find out through dialog he owed a lot of money and was killed by a bounty hunter, which is why we neverhear of him again.
No midiclhorians either.
Okay, maybe that wasn't so short.
 
What are the ways that the Original Trilogy can be improved? It is not perfect. Not by a long shot.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top