Skepticism doesn't mean abject rejection.
They are not extra galactic.
They are extra-universal, or extra-dimensional.
I can only assume that they can only lock onto Picard's universe while there is a beacon flaring, becuase their universe/dimension is spinning and orbiting something, and we are spinning and orbiting something else, so they are never going to find their way back to Picard's universe unless someone sends up another flare.
Soul, essence, it's all metaphysical nonsense.
Star Trek is fiction just as much as Tolkien's elves and Lovecraft's Cthulhu. Fun entertainment. Uploading some wishful thinking called a soul from this 'biological substrate' is every bit as much a fanciful piece of religious woolly thinking as the divine assumption of the Blessed Mary.
You're not understanding what I'm saying at all...
More likely your tinging my explanations with pre-conceptions rather than bothering to understand it. Fair enough.Then maybe do a better job of explaining it?
No, that's not it.More likely your tinging my explanations with pre-conceptions rather than bothering to understand it. Fair enough.
More likely your tinging my explanations with pre-conceptions rather than bothering to understand it. Fair enough.
You explain the same thing the exact same way over and over and over, even when it becomes clear that your approach isn't convincing anybody. At least some of that is on you, dude. You could change tactics when it becomes clear it's not working.
Like, take me, for example: I've moved from dunking on the things you're arguing for (as you're clearly not changing your mind) to pointing out how poorly you're arguing for them. I don't care about changing your mind at this point, I'm now interested in seeing if you can present yourself more persuasively.
Also when every expert is describing something and in fact, turning it into reality with their own realization and acting on it, it goes into a much more highly probable reality.Skepticism doesn't mean abject rejection.
Think back clearly people.
(I doubt that this is going to work.)
Have they actually said what the date is?
Sure they have cell phones, but if they had comic book super science in the 30's and 40's, then of course then should have Cell phones in the 70s or 80s.
That's because how I say it makes complete sense.
The rest..zzzzzz
RAMA
I guess people think of tentacles in terms of the horror genre?? To me...as I explained earlier, it was possibly a very advanced race's way of reducing basic function and manipulation to it's component parts when they want to manifest themselves physically for large scale handling or destruction...whichever comes first.The tentacle thing looked Lovecraftian—but to them, perhaps anything organic reeks of Dark Young type corruption...
I'm not saying they were homaging these guys but the writers are old enough to have played the games. It's not like Star Trek didn't inspire them in the first place.
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net...Reapers.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20180626051615
It has had one in the novels. I believe @Greg Cox had one about the Q continuum using the barrier to protect the galaxy from beings like the energy being in "Day of the Dove."Just a thought.. The Barrier is just one of those things that is sitting there waiting for a good story.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.