Saw it, didn't like it. Apparently I had to read the comic to understand the movie, which makes it a poor movie, in my opinion. If it can't stand up on its own, what's the point? I gave it a D, which was completely honest.
Too many problems:
The Comedian is given NO redeeming qualities in the movie, so why exactly do I care that he died? More importantly, since every flashback concerning him is completely unflattering (with the possible exception of the Moloch flashback, in which he is merely drunk and not attempting to rape or kill anyone), why do the Watchmen care? What is Silk Spectre's power? Sleeping with other masked vigilantes? She's good at that, at least! The actress portraying her was horrible. Why do they have all this magic mojo electronic stuff but Ozymandias has a piece of shit computer with 3.5" disks in his office? Why does Laurie go nuts at learning The Comedian is her father when she hasn't expressed much opinion of him one way or another throughout the rest of the movie? Who did Nixon's makeup? They should be fired immediately. And do they have freaking super powers or what?! The movie is ambiguous on this point, as they seem to keep doing doing strangely "super" things like catching bullets or beating up about 27 guys at a time. And is Rorshach taking parkour classes down at the Y or what?
I've gone over this again and again with some (patient, bless them) friends, but the bald fact of the matter is that for me, someone who didn't read the book, the movie was long, confusing, boring, and incredibly violent (and I am not generally bothered by gruesome and macabre stuff). And the sex scenes! Over-the-top much?? Although, how else could Silk Spectre show off her...er, powers.
I can't believe people are picking on it for not being enough like the book. If it were any more of an inside reference to the book, it would be the book.