As a fan of Star Trek I found myself in an interesting position when it comes to this latest movie in the Star Wars franchise. I don't have a great deal of attachment to the source material or the franchise in general so nothing major stood out to me as being incorrect. However, I know that when I watched JJ Abrams' Star Trek, several things jumped out at me as being just plain wrong. It's all nitpicky stuff (like the leading zero on the Kelvin's registry, the origin of Bones as a nickname, etc) but it stood out to me as a certain lack of attention to detail. I wonder if any Star Wars fans had the same experience with this movie?
I don't consider myself well-versed enough in the Star Wars verse to say if I caught anything but a couple small things made me wonder. One was how Finn got hit by the bad guy's lightsaber a few to several times and didn't lose a limb or die altogether. I think of a lightsaber as being somewhat of a chainsaw made of energy. And if a person had a chainsaw cut right up their spine I'd assume that person was in some serious trouble. But perhaps the medical science is good enough that unless one suffers extreme trauma anything is basically survivable. The other potential issue was the blasters the Stormtroopers were using. I don't recall them doing much damage in the previous films but in this movie a few Stormtroopers blow up an X-Wing just by dumping on it for a few seconds. And perhaps it might inspire some dismay that there was a planet identical to Tattoine but it was called Jakku for no readily apparent reason. Last but not least, we had to have the obligatory shot (which was also in Trek 2009) of a distant planet exploding and people being able to see it with the naked eye even though that should not have been possible. But I feel like there might be more details that were overlooked. What little things (because I'm sure no one was clamoring for the death of a major character so I'll assume that's covered) about JJ Abrams' Star Wars didn't work for you?
I don't consider myself well-versed enough in the Star Wars verse to say if I caught anything but a couple small things made me wonder. One was how Finn got hit by the bad guy's lightsaber a few to several times and didn't lose a limb or die altogether. I think of a lightsaber as being somewhat of a chainsaw made of energy. And if a person had a chainsaw cut right up their spine I'd assume that person was in some serious trouble. But perhaps the medical science is good enough that unless one suffers extreme trauma anything is basically survivable. The other potential issue was the blasters the Stormtroopers were using. I don't recall them doing much damage in the previous films but in this movie a few Stormtroopers blow up an X-Wing just by dumping on it for a few seconds. And perhaps it might inspire some dismay that there was a planet identical to Tattoine but it was called Jakku for no readily apparent reason. Last but not least, we had to have the obligatory shot (which was also in Trek 2009) of a distant planet exploding and people being able to see it with the naked eye even though that should not have been possible. But I feel like there might be more details that were overlooked. What little things (because I'm sure no one was clamoring for the death of a major character so I'll assume that's covered) about JJ Abrams' Star Wars didn't work for you?