• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Was Hitler actually evil?

For what it's worth, I once saw a picture of Hitler patting a dog on the head.

He was also a snazzy dancer.

hitler.gif


Look at him go!
 
I'm not sure Hitler was a sociopath, but Mussolini almost certainly was.
I'm not sure I agree. Mussolini was certainly a strong-man politician, and his predatory, dictatorial rule over Italy was the lowest point in our history in many centuries.


Good God, your posts are so stale it physically makes me sick to read them.

All I can say is, if you've seen some of the whack jobs in the DS9 forum who try to claim Dukat's just this wonderful, jolly guy who was SO misunderstood by the Bajorans and just wanted to make it ALL better for them during the Occupation...well, the excuses I'm seeing for Hitler here are no better. If relativism cannot even condemn those who MOST deserve condemnation in our history, then it is worthless. Period. Evil MUST be named, condemned, and opposed.
So far, nobody has proclaimed Hitler a "wonderful, jolly guy who was just misunderstood". His evils have been named, condemned and opposed. So you can take your accuses and, well, you know the rest. If anything, trying to understand where he came from, and why he did the things he did is the best way to make sure something similar doesn't happen again. Nazism, for all its undeniable evil, was a product of its time and social environment, and it must be understood in those terms if you want to recognize the symptoms early and eradicate it before it is too late. If you fail to recognize the difference between understanding the reasons for an action and finding excuses for said action, you live in a very limited and dogmatic world which has a really flimsy connection with actual reality.

You utterly misunderstand relativism, and you completely fail to understand its principle: that actions are to be praised or condemned over their consequences, not over some preconceived notions that you hold true just because. Relativism is not about excusing evil: it's about recognizing evil case-by-case, instead of just some sweeping generalization that most often doesn't hold true upon inspection. But I guess you are less interested in understanding than in condemning everybody who disagrees with you. As usual, I can say.

Nobody's saying he's Santa with a funny mustache. But I think cultural relativism is problematic. Moral laws are moral laws, and they don't change just because. Human sacrifice is wrong, not just because it brings about an evil, but because it IS evil. No amount of excuse making can make it OK to murder someone in cold blood. Not even if you think that this will bring about a good for hundreds or thousands of others.

Besides which, I think cultural relativism is somewhat racist. We can't hold people to standards because their culture is incapable of such things? Only if you believe that cultures never change, or that Aztecs were geneticly predisposed to think that murdering thousands of people would bring back the sun. If it's wrong for me to kill, it should be wrong for you to kill as well.


I agree there are serious problems with cultural relativism, but it is often used the other way to justify certain things. Based on our current value systems almost every society in history can be accused of being evil including early America. It is not uncommon to claim you can't judge a society by current moral standards when that society is one people have a stake in building up as a good society.
 
Yes, he was evil. My family is among those harmed by his implementation of the Progressive ideals started in the US, proving just how dangerous those ideals are.
Would you mind clarifying this?
No problem. Being born in 1935 my dad grew up in WWII Germany. Between scrounging for food, forced from city to city dodging bombs and finally escaping East Berlin under gunfire I think we can call that a hardship.

We decided to give you 24 hours to clarify your comments regarding the alleged connection between progressive policies and Nazism, and - as expected - you sidestepped the issue. Besides the fact that the modern Progressive/Liberal connection has no bearing on the Progressives in the US pre-WWII, it's obvious that it was just a shot in the dark attempt at getting a reaction from your fellow posters. Fortunately people are on to your game now and didn't rise to the bait.

So, you've earned yourself an infraction for Trolling.

We had sincerely hoped that you would change your style of posting in political topics after the discussions we had with you a week ago, because we do feel that you contribute positively in some other discussions. It's a shame that you won't do that though. But you can't exactly play the victim as if you weren't given a chance to change.

I'd say comments to PM, but I know you won't comment to me. So you can feel free to take it up with another mod or admin if you like.
 
If Hitler had ignored the Jews and other "undesirables" and never established concentration camps, history would be far kinder to him. Whenever people think of Hitler they immediately think "Holocaust" "6 million Jews" "auswhitz", not invaded Poland, France and Russia.

Look at Stalin and Mao. They killed more of their own people than Hitler did, but rarely will you find people using them as a comparison to someone the person doesnt like. The tea baggers are perfect examples. They will equate Obama to Hitler, but I dont recall seeing any posters equating him to Stalin or Mao or even Saddam Hussein.
 
Actually quite a few people have compared Obama to Mao, not to mention Che. It puts emphasis on socialism whereas most people focus on Hitler's nationalism and racial policies, not his socialist goals.
 
Hitler was someone who, like many, needed a scapegoat for his own failings and the Jews became his scapegoat.

Was he evil? How does one define evil? At the very least, under his reign, evil flourished and he did nothing to check it.

He knew of the various atrocities and did nothing, in fact approved of them. There are also some rather disturbing things about his personal life that have come to light and putting it all together, he was probably evil.

Ditto for Stalin. I'm not sure which was worse, they were both evil.
 
No amount of excuse making can make it OK to murder someone in cold blood. Not even if you think that this will bring about a good for hundreds or thousands of others.

Does that mean you are opposed to sending soldiers to die? Or sending them to kill other people?

Yes. That's the same thing as killing people who've done nothing to deserve it.

There's a universe of difference between soldiers killing soldiers in the name of protecting nations or ideals and killing people because you don't want their genes to taint you ideal vision of humanity.
 
No amount of excuse making can make it OK to murder someone in cold blood. Not even if you think that this will bring about a good for hundreds or thousands of others.

Does that mean you are opposed to sending soldiers to die? Or sending them to kill other people?

Yes. That's the same thing as killing people who've done nothing to deserve it.

There's a universe of difference between soldiers killing soldiers in the name of protecting nations or ideals and killing people because you don't want their genes to taint you ideal vision of humanity.

Oh, for goodness sake. Don't you get my point? Here, in basic terms anyone here should be able to understand: SAYING THAT PREMEDITATED KILLING IS WRONG EVEN FOR THE "GREATER GOOD" OF MANY OTHERS IS INCOMPATABLE WITH THE VERY IDEA OF HAVING SOLDIERS. The comment made by Balthier is hypocritical and not logical. That's my point, got it?

Now, to respond to you: Have most soldiers done anything to "deserve it"? I'm so reassured to hear you think a soldier dying "deserved it". Do you have a son? I'll draft him into my army, callously send him off to die to test the defenses of EnemyNationLand, and then shrug it off. "It's not the same as "killing someone in cold blood"-he's a soldier, not "a person who did nothing to deserve it".

Plus, is not preventing the "tainting of an ideal vision" an ideal? Why is it okay to draft a load of young men and boys into a military, send them off to die for your ideals, but moan when people do esssentially the same thing for their ideals? These things are complicated, subtle, lots of different viewpoints and moralities.
Again, what I'm saying here- and you're missing- is that while people claim to follow such black and white ideas as "killing people is wrong", they in practice don't actually practice what they preach- and things are often very complicated.
 
If Hitler had ignored the Jews and other "undesirables" and never established concentration camps, history would be far kinder to him. Whenever people think of Hitler they immediately think "Holocaust" "6 million Jews" "auswhitz", not invaded Poland, France and Russia.

Look at Stalin and Mao. They killed more of their own people than Hitler did, but rarely will you find people using them as a comparison to someone the person doesnt like. The tea baggers are perfect examples. They will equate Obama to Hitler, but I dont recall seeing any posters equating him to Stalin or Mao or even Saddam Hussein.
Your point is almost self defeating. Stalin and Mao and Saddam all had purges inw hich they killed many many people. What makes Hitler different? Started WW2 (In Europe). And lost.
 
Actually quite a few people have compared Obama to Mao, not to mention Che.

And they're generally one of 5 groups of people

A: Idiots
B: No longer post in here
C: Work for FOX News
D: A and B
E: A and C
 
Your point is almost self defeating. Stalin and Mao and Saddam all had purges inw hich they killed many many people. What makes Hitler different? Started WW2 (In Europe). And lost.

Hitler also commited a whole lot of other crimes besides murdering the Jews; the Nazis' treatment of handicapped people and the Soviet POWs just as two examples.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top