Fair Haven was a Voyager episode, a holodeck episode in the Irish village of Fair Haven.
Ah...
I vaguely remember seeing that episode, but I don't recall seeing anything 'racist'...
Just a typical VOY episode.
Last edited:
Fair Haven was a Voyager episode, a holodeck episode in the Irish village of Fair Haven.
The result of her work don't come near to convincing me that she was writing Janeway better than any of the other VOY stuff. IMO, Kira was written much better even though all the DS9 staff writers were male.It's bound to happen when you try and do a show that's supposed to be mutli-cultural/racial and only have a writing staff composed of just one race. Look at DS9, it took Avery Brooks to speak up and bring cultural heritage issues into the show. It took bringing in Jeri Taylor into Voyager to figure out how to write for a captian who is also a woman.Of course it's an opinion and a perception thing. I just tend to believe that the filmmakers mean no harm. Same goes for novelists.
TheGodBen, who is Irish, feels otherwise.Fair Haven was a Voyager episode, a holodeck episode in the Irish village of Fair Haven.
Ah...
I vaguely remember seeing that episode, but I don't recall seeing anything 'racist'...
Just a typical VOY episode.
Any money as well, they couldn't afford to make all aliens look alien. Hell, the reason they started using so many forehead aliens in TNG+ was because it was too money-consuming to make them all totally covered up like the S1-S2 TNG Aliens were.
Just because someone belongs to a certain group of people defined by gender or ethnicity, doesn't necessarily make them the perfect spokesperson for that group, and doesn't guarantee that they'd be great at writing characters from the same group. There are lots of female writers who do a shitty job (IMO) of writing female characters, just as there are lots of male writers who do the same.
I'm not disputing that people who belong to a certain group are much more likely to have the necessary experience and insight into writing about that group of people. But being from that group in no way guarantees that you will actually write about that group well - for starters, it depends on whether you're a good writer at all. And it most certainly doesn't mean that you can represent the entire group of people in a way that all or most of its members could relate to. Case in point, while it's good to have insight from a woman who's been pregnant on the emotions and hormonal reactions of women during pregnancy (for example, Nana Visitor says she had to tell the male writers that Kira would actually have developed an attachment to the baby she was carrying, even if it wasn't her offspring ). But you can't just assume that having a woman on the staff will make your female characters awesome no more than you can assume that having a man on the staff means that your male characters will be amazing and that every man will relate to them. There's a bunch of articles and books written by women and meant to be about female experience that I don't relate at all or vehemently disagree with.Just because someone belongs to a certain group of people defined by gender or ethnicity, doesn't necessarily make them the perfect spokesperson for that group, and doesn't guarantee that they'd be great at writing characters from the same group. There are lots of female writers who do a shitty job (IMO) of writing female characters, just as there are lots of male writers who do the same.
I have to disagree; and many others will disagree.
When you get into one racial background writing another, there could be problems....
'What's Happening Now' was a 1980's sequel to the show 'What's Happening' from the 70s...and it was so obvious the writers were white...basically because the way the characters talked and acted, and the way the stories were written.
Even on some shows or movies depicting Asians in the 80s are written in a stereotypical manner. (Usually the male has to speak with an accent, and the female sometimes speaks perfect English...and--usually--falls for the white hero at first sight).
I don't always agree with Spike Lee, but the film Malcolm X was initially going to focus on a white character rather than Malcolm X himself (this was if the film was to be helmed by the white director Norman Jewison). Of course, Spike Lee was able to get the project going with him at the helm, and we got the movie that was eventually released.
So, yeah...In regards to racial depictions or even gender depictions, sometimes those of the race or gender know better than those who are not of x-race or x-gender...
Of course, if research and an honest portrayal in put into the work there can be exceptions...
.
Roddenberry established the concept of highlighting racism as early as TOS. How many instances can you count of someone - from McCoy to the Guest Character of the Week to Kirk himself - addressing racist remarks to that "half-breed" Spock?
Yeah, that REALLY rubs me the wrong way.
This is interesting because this takes place 75+ years after TOS...and Trek makes it seem as if black people don't marry out. This is the case with Sisko, and Uhura (in 'Man Trap') and even Jake....and even with Tuvok...(as if they are afraid to have someone who is non-black portray a love interest).
We've already seen the aforementioned Keiko (Asian) and Miles (white) and Alyssa (Asian) and unnamed crewman (white)...as well as Harry Kim (Asian) and his girlfriends (white)....and even in the ENT episode E2 where a descendant of Archer was obviously Asian.
Richard Daystrom's descendant could have also been Asian, Native American, Vulcan, Latin, Irish....etc...
It's a bit narrow-minded on their part to not have diversity in that area; I personally would have welcomed Susan Gibney as Dr. 'Leah' Daystrom....
I'm not disputing that people who belong to a certain group are much more likely to have the necessary experience and insight into writing about that group of people. But being from that group in no way guarantees that you will actually write about that group well - for starters, it depends on whether you're a good writer at all. And it most certainly doesn't mean that you can represent the entire group of people in a way that all or most of its members could relate to. Case in point, while it's good to have insight from a woman who's been pregnant on the emotions and hormonal reactions of women during pregnancy (for example, Nana Visitor says she had to tell the male writers that Kira would actually have developed an attachment to the baby she was carrying, even if it wasn't her offspring ). But you can't just assume that having a woman on the staff will make your female characters awesome no more than you can assume that having a man on the staff means that your male characters will be amazing and that every man will relate to them. There's a bunch of articles and books written by women and meant to be about female experience that I don't relate at all or vehemently disagree with.
And, as the above example of "Up the Long Ladder" and "Fair Haven/Spirit Folk" shows, you can't assume that having an Irishman as one of the producers/writers guarantees that the portrayal of Irish characters will not be horribly offensive to some Irish viewers. You're very unlikely to get a consensus in any ethnic, national, religious etc. group on what the proper representations of the group are - more likely, you'll find the harshest disagreements and opposed views among the members of the group.
It's because no matter what they choose, someone will criticize them for it. If they match races it's not being supportive of multi-racial marriages, and if they are multi-racial they are accused of implying that a member of the same race wasn't good enough for the minority member of the couple. See the discussion of "code of honor"
Plus you know they would have gotten a ton of flak if they gave the Daystrom family a "race-lift", to use the term from TVtropes. They'd be accused to believing, well I'm not sure what, something bad about black people.
Of course TNG is racist! Well, in the first season at least.
They made a black guy drive the ship!
And that same 'black guy' commanded the ship during Arsenal of Freedom...
And that same 'black guy' commanded the ship during Arsenal of Freedom...
Plus there is at least one black Captain in Season 1 ('Conspiracy'), and, if I recall, a few black Admirals, as well.
I personally don't recall any Admirals on TNG who fit that description....Although a Black Admiral just totally falls into that hoary old 'Black Admiral who is a total badass' cliche.![]()
Although a Black Admiral just totally falls into that hoary old 'Black Admiral who is a total badass' cliche.![]()
Everything is a cliché.
TNG tended to have one off minor black or non-black characters who showed up for minor scenes every now and then. (Especially after the first season as the characters in the background and guest shots became less diverse; a pre-dominantly Caucasian cast in a supposedly mult-racial future).
I remember the admiral or commodore who presided over Kirks court martial /trial in TOS.
He appeared to be presiding over other admiral judges as well.
His portrayal was a 3 dimensional, normal portrayal of an admiral presiding over a trial, however small that role was.
That can go for anything actually, not just black performers:I like the calm, quiet, competent portrayals - - doesn't have to be big time action, or something to make it obvious that they're using a black actor for the role, for the sake of racial diversity.
In a way they do:Perhaps Asians and some other ethnicities suffer even worse in this aspect.
From what I've always heard, it had more to do with the fact that the audience at large loved Sun and Jin as a couple, which made the writers ditch the love triangle idea (fortunately... If only they had gotten rid of some other love triangles on that showOf course, Daniel Dae Kim was on ENT very, very briefly before he had a bigger and better role on the more popular LOST. (Although, they were initially going to kill him off and have his onscreen wife, Sun go for Michael....but many Asian-Americans protested that because there was actually an Asian couple onscreen).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.