^^What was the reference to Gallifrey in Torchwood? I don't remember that at all.
Right. The Eleventh remembers, because he's both the most recent Doctor (and as established by previous multi-Doctor stories, all past Doctors forget their crossing-over, except for the latest one) and because he initiated the whole thing. It was his decision to alter the outcome of Gallifrey's fate.They did change history, but as far as the doctors previous to Smith doctor know they didn't.I disagree. They explicitly state that they changed history. Ten even remarks at Eleven for daring to think that.
It's Moffat who changed/retconned history. Granted there was some wiggle room go make the restoration of Galifrey possible.
Dialogue from episodes that corroborate Galifrey falling and burning. Off the top of my head would be.
Doctor Who
"End of the World"
"Dalek"
"Father's Day"
"The Parting of the Ways"
"The Sound of Drums"
"Fires Of Pompeii"
I want to say "Journey's End" and "Stolen Earth" but I can't be sure. I haven't seen them in awhile.
"The End of Time"
Torchwood
"Adrift"
They didn't change history, they just think they are changing history due to not remembering how events actually played out.
There's really no way to know.
The interesting thing is, the Series seem to have been schizophrenic about wether Gallifrey was only Time Locked or actually was also physically destroyed. At times The Doctor seems to have meant only locked away, and at other times he's made it clear that there is no doubt it was destroyed.
Is this a convenient inconsistency in writing that we can now say shows both versions/memories (to some degree) were there all along?
They didn't change history, they just think they are changing history due to not remembering how events actually played out.
There's really no way to know.
Yeah it's definitely a paradox. I think one could argue Eleven freely chose at that moment to change history... which then retroactively made it the way things always happened.
The alternative is that everything the Doctors do is simply destined to happen, which I don't think the show has ever wanted to be truly the case.
Steven Moffat said:“I remember thinking, ‘what was the most important occasion in the Doctor’s life?’ Obviously it was the day he blew up Gallifrey. Then I tried to imagine what writing that scene would be like, and I thought literally – there’s kids on Gallifrey and he’s going to push the button. He wouldn’t. He wouldn’t. I don’t care what’s at stake, he’s not going to do it. So that was the story – of course he never did that. He couldn’t have. He’s the Doctor, he’s the man who doesn’t do that. He’s defined by the fact that he doesn’t do that. Whatever the cost, he will find another way. So it had to be the story of what really happened that he’s forgotten. Of course he didn’t! He’s Doctor Who. He doesn’t do things like that.”
Hmm, cool interview. And I have to agree with Moffat that the Doctor destroying Gallifrey has always seemed hugely out of character for him.
Yea, I get all that. There were times, though, when it seemed The Doctor spoke as if The Time Lock was the only problemThe interesting thing is, the Series seem to have been schizophrenic about wether Gallifrey was only Time Locked or actually was also physically destroyed. At times The Doctor seems to have meant only locked away, and at other times he's made it clear that there is no doubt it was destroyed.
Is this a convenient inconsistency in writing that we can now say shows both versions/memories (to some degree) were there all along?
I never saw an inconsistency. The planet was physically destroyed (he thought), and the time-lock prevented him (or anyone else) from going back into the planet's history to change that event. That's all. It's not actually as complicated as you seem to want to make it.
Besides which, Time Lords have always seemed to be time-locked relative to each other anyway. One Time Lord always meets another in the same order - the Doctor never meets the Master earlier in the Master's personal relative timeline than the last time he met him. They stay in parallel to each other, even if they're all over the place relative to the rest of the universe. Not sure how that happens - settings of their TARDISes, nature of the time vortex, pure luck - but it does. (River doesn't count because by the time she started time travelling she wasn't a Time Lord anymore.)
If it counts for the individuals, I assume it counts for the planet as well. The Doctor could never go back to an earlier point in Gallifrey's history than the one he was naturally in sync with. That was always the case. Now that it's destroyed, that's even more so. It's just that now the time-lock applies to everyone else as well.
(Of course, while writing this I realize that the very events of this episode contradict that, as all 13 Doctors are present at the same time, which means at least some of them must be non-relative. I will justify it by saying that the Bad Wolf/Moment allowed the exception.)
Yeah it's definitely a paradox. I think one could argue Eleven freely chose at that moment to change history... which then retroactively made it the way things always happened.
The alternative is that everything the Doctors do is simply destined to happen, which I don't think the show has ever wanted to be truly the case.
It's not a paradox. It's the way it always was. The only difference is that now the Doctor knows this is the way it always was. He thought it was the other way before, but he was wrong.
Here's an actual quote from an interview with Steven Moffat, which I believe supports my version.
Steven Moffat said:“I remember thinking, ‘what was the most important occasion in the Doctor’s life?’ Obviously it was the day he blew up Gallifrey. Then I tried to imagine what writing that scene would be like, and I thought literally – there’s kids on Gallifrey and he’s going to push the button. He wouldn’t. He wouldn’t. I don’t care what’s at stake, he’s not going to do it. So that was the story – of course he never did that. He couldn’t have. He’s the Doctor, he’s the man who doesn’t do that. He’s defined by the fact that he doesn’t do that. Whatever the cost, he will find another way. So it had to be the story of what really happened that he’s forgotten. Of course he didn’t! He’s Doctor Who. He doesn’t do things like that.”
Hmm, cool interview. And I have to agree with Moffat that the Doctor destroying Gallifrey has always seemed hugely out of character for him.
I thought so too before the episode "The End of Time". When Rassilon's plan to make all the time lords pure energy/consciousness was revealed and that it would kill EVERY other living thing in the galaxy. It wasn't just the carnage of the war that drove the Doctor to use the moment. It was his desire to save all of creation.Since the timelords were about to cross the line that not even the Dalek's were capable of crossing.
"The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few" kind of thing.
Hmm, cool interview. And I have to agree with Moffat that the Doctor destroying Gallifrey has always seemed hugely out of character for him.
I thought so too before the episode "The End of Time". When Rassilon's plan to make all the time lords pure energy/consciousness was revealed and that it would kill EVERY other living thing in the galaxy. It wasn't just the carnage of the war that drove the Doctor to use the moment. It was his desire to save all of creation.Since the timelords were about to cross the line that not even the Dalek's were capable of crossing.
"The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few" kind of thing.
Did the Doctor know Rassilon et al were going to do that though? I'm not certain he did.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.