Babaganoosh said:
I hope theing writers are happy about that shit.
Yeah, I'm sure delaying Star Trek by five months was one of the major goals of the strike...
Variety: 'Star Trek' moved from Christmas '08 to May '09
- Thread starter Lawrence B
- Start date
Yeah, I'm sure delaying Star Trek by five months was one of the major goals of the strike...
EliyahuQeoni said:
Babaganoosh said:
I hope the
Yeah, I'm sure delaying Star Trek by five months was one of the major goals of the strike...
Maybe it wasn't a *goal*, but it's...collateral damage. Doesn't make it any less
worthy.
I wouldn't want 'Star Trek' to come out in December, '08. It wouldn't be a complete film!
A
Avilos
Guest
I am surprised that Rick Berman has not been blamed for this yet.
What alarms me is that this news story is only an hour or so old and we've already got this many posts about it.
Just wait till the sun rises. There's gonna be a whole lot of shocked people!
Meh, not a big deal. Obviously I want to see the film sooner rather than later and Angels and Demons scares the hell out of me, but I think over all this is going to be better for the movie. The whole Christmas Day thing never sat too well with me and this is the kind of high profile slot the movie deserves.
Why not? They originally thought it would be.
I'd agree with the thousand voices crying out in terror part, but suddenly silenced? I don't think so. 
Why not release it Christmas 2008 and then The Making of Ster Trek in May 2009, followed by Trekkies: The New Generation Christmas 2009, then Revenge of the Trekkies . . .
EnsignRicky said:
I'd agree with the thousand voices crying out in terror part, but suddenly silenced? I don't think so.
Indeed. Silence us loud, opinionated bastards? Fat chance.
How are the letters coming folks? I'm up to #8. I've enlisted the help of my younger brother who is under the impression it's a sequel to the original Star Wars trilogy.
A
Avilos
Guest
I just thought of something. If the film is completed a significant time before its released there could be big problems. The chances of major leaks increase. Scripts and footage appearing online.
StarMan said:
EnsignRicky said:
I'd agree with the thousand voices crying out in terror part, but suddenly silenced? I don't think so.
Indeed. Silence us loud, opinionated bastards? Fat chance.
How are the letters coming folks? I'm up to #8. I've enlisted the help of my younger brother who is under the impression it's a sequel to the original Star Wars trilogy.
I couldn't find a clever way to write the quote, so I just used the original!
I can wait five extra months. It's not a big deal.
Of course I have no choice in the matter. So if it was a big deal to me, well, it still wouldn't matter.
Trek XI coming to a cinema near you May 2009. :thumbsup:
Of course I have no choice in the matter. So if it was a big deal to me, well, it still wouldn't matter.
Trek XI coming to a cinema near you May 2009. :thumbsup:
But just imagine all the extra shit you and the other mods are going to have to deal with because of 5 extra months of waiting!
Meh, we'll get over it. Either that or our heads will explode. Much to the delight of some people I'd imagine.
We now get five additional months of the Trek XI forum, before it gets folded back into Trek movies.
We now get five additional months of the Trek XI forum, before it gets folded back into Trek movies.
Which really makes no sense at all, since the announcement is being made AFTER the strike has ended.
They went as far as to give the Dec. '08 date what seems like mere DAYS ago, but now that the strike is over they're moving the date forward FIVE MONTHS?
That just makes no sense.
If the strike was a real problem, they wouldn't have already given the Dec. '08 date to begin with.
Similar threads
