Spoilers Variety Article on Patrick Stewart's Return

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Picard' started by Tuskin38, Jan 8, 2020.

  1. JamesRye

    JamesRye Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2012
    But.....but I thought Star Trek showed a positive vision for humanity, one where we had overcome our petty problems and that we had evolved and that science and reason would triumph. Wasn't it always the aliens that were analagous to our current flawed thinking?

    Star Trek used to portray a positive future for mankind. Now it seems it's veering toward a more corrupt and dystopian picture of mankind's future. It may be good story telling but is it the Star Trek of Gene Roddenberry's vision?
     
  2. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    You can have a positive vision, that we learn to get along and reach out into space. But you can't hang every war on somebody else with humanities hands clean. We aren't supposed to be perfect in TOS. Just that we had solved some of our problems, while it was clear that we were still human.

    "All right. It's instinctive. But the instinct can be fought. We're human beings with the blood of a million savage years on our hands, but we can stop it. We can admit that we're killers, but we're not going to kill today. That's all it takes. Knowing that we won't kill today."

    From "A Taste of Armageddon", where the Federation was trying to force a treaty port on an unwilling planet. Even ignoring the 'Code 710' which told them to stay away.
     
    nicholasm, Greg Cox, ITDUDE and 6 others like this.
  3. Cake

    Cake Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Of course they won't portray it as a good thing. After all the stated goal of TPTB is among other things to criticize current US and UK politics.

    ---

    Also from the article:
    So sounds like even racism might be a thing again. And I am curious how far they will go with poverty? Will people starve despite the Federation having replicators? Or just live in really shitty homes though again that shouldn't be a problem with the technology and countless worlds available. And I guess as negotiations and non violent problem-solving are out, we might even get some action hero Picard scenes despite his age.
     
  4. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    I imagine this has to do with the Romulans who I think are living on Mars. Humanity will continue to uphold its own moral superiority while treating others like shit. Like how they spent a long time looking down on the Ferengi.

    I wouldn't count it out. But I wouldn't expect conference room scenes every episode as this is one-ten part story.
     
    Ovation likes this.
  5. The Old Mixer

    The Old Mixer Mih ssim, mih ssim, nam, daed si Xim. Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Location:
    The Old Mixer, Somewhere in Connecticut
    High-minded values like those of TNG are meaningless if not put to the test. It sounds like Picard will be doing just that.
     
  6. The Wormhole

    The Wormhole Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Location:
    The Wormhole
    Good storytelling and Gene's Vision rarely mix together anyway.

    Besides, the "positive future" Star Trek pedals is simply that humanity eventually becomes a united race and heads into space. And every Star Trek series reflects this. This does not mean humanity is picture perfect flawless and humans never get into conflict with one another, nor should it ever mean that.

    And what about TOS, which implies early in season one that humanity are conquerors? That's right, The Conscience of the King has a line implying humans conquered Vulcans. You want to go back to Gene's Vision, let's go back to the 1960s where Gene saw his perfect humans as galactic conquerors. That's a Gene's Vision I want to learn more about. Well, that and the one with naked women on a tropical island...
     
    nicholasm, ITDUDE, Nyotarules and 5 others like this.
  7. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    It did at one time. But Gene Roddenberry of 1966 was very different from the one of 1987. Roddenberry had bought into the hype.
     
  8. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Star Trek has always criticized whatever the current day politics were. This isn’t new at all.
     
  9. The Wormhole

    The Wormhole Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2001
    Location:
    The Wormhole
    It's my experience when people say Gene's Vision, they mean the 1980s mentally ill alcoholic Gene who wanted bland humans as the pinnacle we all are supposed to aspire to. I agree, 1960s Gene would have realized he wouldn't net an audience that way. Then again, 1980s Gene took advantage of already having a built in audience who were guaranteed to watch the show because it had been too long since televised Star Trek was a thing, so he didn't really need to worry about appealing to the masses the way 1960s Gene did.
     
  10. Dave Scarpa

    Dave Scarpa Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    They don’t understand that Trek is positivity. It’s what we aspire to be. We look at these issues thru the dealings with the various aliens we meet. We don’t want Starfleet to be exclusive.
     
    Cake likes this.
  11. The Old Mixer

    The Old Mixer Mih ssim, mih ssim, nam, daed si Xim. Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2002
    Location:
    The Old Mixer, Somewhere in Connecticut
    The important thing is that Picard, our protagonist, champions those ideals. Starfleet and the Federation are just setting / plot devices.
     
  12. fireproof78

    fireproof78 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2014
    Location:
    Journeying onwards
    Exactly.
     
    SolarisOne and Tuskin38 like this.
  13. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Yes they do.
     
  14. Winterwind

    Winterwind Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Location:
    London, Canada
    I guess you never watched TOS.

    While Starfleet officers strove to be better the average everyday human didn't. And even Starfleet officers broke on occasion.
     
    Nyotarules, SolarisOne and Ovation like this.
  15. Ovation

    Ovation Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Location:
    La Belle Province
    This article has done much to reassure me that the new series will NOT be TNG 2.0. To the extent the series is as described in the interview, I will be happy.
     
  16. Uhura's Song

    Uhura's Song Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2017
    I get where you are coming from.

    In TOS, in a country divided at war & divided on racial lines, Trek shone a light in what humanity could achieve. An optimistic take on humanity's future. Much needed and deservedly well loved.

    TNG continued that optimistic take. Some critics complain TOS/TNG was too polyanna. But within it, there was still Federation gone bad stuff (Undiscovered Country, Conspiracy, Drumhead, Insurrection, etc).

    By the same token, just because a show may be darker, grittier, less polyanna, that optimistic vision, that light, is still gonna shine. It did during DS9. It did during the rare edgy Voyager episodes. It during Enterprise. It continues in Discovery.
     
  17. Jayson1

    Jayson1 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2017
    I think the Federation has always been America but a idealized version of it. The key though is it has been positive and hopeful and with a sense of fun. It explored real issues but they didn't often go with super cynical takes on them. Always sort of leaving the feeling that people can rise above them.. Also despite human flaws their is something special about the human race. We are more than just evolved apes with tech. Also while they sometimes explored current day issues they never went after present day figures. At no point on TNG for example do you see a character and say. That's clearly Reagan or Bush. And the one time they went very topical with Wesley's just say no to drugs speech I think we fans laughed at how absurd it played.

    Basically they were more subtle and avoided the modern day lingo and talking points of the time. Like nobody ever used the Ferengi by having one say something like "We believe in trickle down profit" or something so on the nose like that. Well at least in the better written episodes. It's not a accident that Hippies, about as dated a thing as you will see in Trek is a very bad episode. Usually if you could see to much current day political talking points it was not something that played well.

    I personally think the show is going to be great but I also have a feeling it's something that people might not love even if they appreciate how well made it is. That is because it's not going be something you want to put on because your having a bad day or your feeling lonely and you want to be with tv friends for a lack of a better word. It's not going to feel special in the way Trek does. It's going be like many tv shows. Their are plenty of shows out their that are better shows than Trek in many ways but some shows sort of appeal to people on I guess you could say a more emotional level. Were you love it because of how it makes you feel even if comes with little bad quirks like some bad acting here and their or some bad episodes but even though the episode is bad you still kind of like it. Things like that.


    Jason
     
    Cake likes this.
  18. Mondragon

    Mondragon Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    You man other then Gene Roddenberry?
    USS means "United Space Ship" and that "Enterprise is a member of the Starship Class".[
    And with the eradication of political earth boarders, hunger, money, etc, it never once represented the US alone, (then or at a later time), but an idealized as yet achieved global and the galaxy wide future.
    Not sure how people(supposed fans) can get that so wrong?
     
  19. Tuskin38

    Tuskin38 Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    The Federation was the USA (or just NATO) and the Klimgons were the Soviet Union. In allegory of course. It’s very obvious when watching Undiscovered Country.

    The show also tried to push some American ideals (Remember when Kirk read the American constitution?)
     
    PT109, Greg Cox, SolarisOne and 2 others like this.
  20. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    "USS" is the prefix used by the United States Navy. Of which, Gene Roddenberry was a member.

    It wasn't the "galaxy" wide future for humanity. As clearly shown by colonies like Terra Nova and Turkana IV. Not all humans were happy with the course of Earth, and later, the Federation. We even see that with the Terra Prime movement in Enterprise.

    Because we haven't gotten it wrong. The proof is in the proverbial pudding.
     
    The Wormhole, SolarisOne and Ovation like this.