Ooh, nice! How accurate is it, I wonder, without the orthos as reference?
It is also irrelevant.
botched fusions...Huh.
I wonder how they'd explain the Discovery Klingons.
Hmm. Romulan and Klingon ships have oftentimes been very green. The Enterprise, not so much. I always thought it looked off-white to grayish, with only the most subtle hint of green.Huh? I'm saying that the TOS ship often looked green on screen. No other Trek ship looked green, and ... I don't know, I find it odd to paint starships green in-universe.
The change in the Klingons happened in 1979. DS9's "Trials and Tribble-ations" came out in 1996. I assure you, people cared about the change before then. Do you not remember the 1980s? The Internet wasn't a thing, obviously, but fans talked and debated about it in person, at conventions, in fanzines, in articles in Best of Trek, etc. Hypotheses were offered in novels like John M. Ford's Final Reflection, and in RPGs, and in comics.Well, I remember the tizzy. When the episode came out, the early internet started to talk about it as if there was some big mystery, even though no one cared about the change until then.
It was the biggest, longest-standing elephant-in-the-room unanswered question in Trek canon. How could resolving it be "unnecessary"?...it's a solution to a non-existent problem. They found a half-decent answer, but it was unnecessary.
I'm not saying ENT's explanation was the best or most elegant possible approach... but at least it put an end to 26 years of speculation. The FASA Klingon module basically followed Ford's approach, if I recall correctly, which I always thought was the most elegant solution. Of course I always thought TNG should have modeled its Klingon culture in general on Ford's ideas rather than the RDM approach it actually followed... but that ship sailed long ago.Because it felt unnecessary, tacked on and poorly executed is why. It didn't expand upon the lore, and felt out of place, like the TMP Klingons did from TOS Klingons.
Yes, it is a problem for people. FASA RPG handled it better.
I'm guessing the FASA books implied these "fusions" were deliberate attempts at genetic engineering/modification by the Klingons themselves... in Discovery's case, it's more likely the result of the Klingons conquering a few Romulan planets, raping all of their women and then shipping the resulting offspring back to the homeworld as war spoils. That would explain why so many of the Klingons all have similar appearances; they're probably all close to the same age and just happen to be the generation that finds itself predominantly in charge right now. We know from Alexander's background that Klingons mature very quickly compared to humans, so T'Kuvma and Voq -- along with the rest of the Disco Klingons -- probably aren't more than 12 to 15 years old.So, they did the fusion dance but didn't extend their fingers properly?
Hmm. Romulan and Klingon ships have oftentimes been very green. The Enterprise, not so much. I always thought it looked off-white to grayish, with only the most subtle hint of green.
The change in the Klingons happened in 1979. DS9's "Trials and Tribble-ations" came out in 1996. I assure you, people cared about the change before then. Do you not remember the 1980s?
It was the biggest, longest-standing elephant-in-the-room unanswered question in Trek canon. How could resolving it be "unnecessary"?
I'd recommend you start by going to imgur.com and uploading the picture there (you don't have to make an account to do this). Then you need to copy the image url (right click on the image and click copy image address). Click the insert image button here in Trekbbs and paste the address to your image. You should see the image in your post at this point, and you'll be ready to post it.Many pages back, someone asked for a comparison between the TOS Enterprise and the Discoprise. Did an image quickly. How do I insert an image from my laptop?
Not if the explanation is pseudo-scientific gibberish. Which "Divergence" basically was.But an in-universe explanation for something is always preferable to a real-world explanation. The former facilitates the willing suspension of disbelief; the latter breaks it.
Something's not quite right. I can't see the image.![]()
If this is not what was wanted I can make changes.
But an in-universe explanation for something is always preferable to a real-world explanation. The former facilitates the willing suspension of disbelief; the latter breaks it.
It was me, I wanted to compare with this angleSorry, it was visible for me. Next try.![]()
But, that's the real point isn't it-personal preferences. Even GR considered abandoning the Klingons all together, and, in my opinion, that would have been for the best. That's my preference.I'm not saying ENT's explanation was the best or most elegant possible approach... but at least it put an end to 26 years of speculation. The FASA Klingon module basically followed Ford's approach, if I recall correctly, which I always thought was the most elegant solution. Of course I always thought TNG should have modeled its Klingon culture in general on Ford's ideas rather than the RDM approach it actually followed... but that ship sailed long ago.
The Romulan fusion was always just
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.