The Cage bridge appearing in Where No Man Has Gone Before could mean that Pike's Disco-Style bridge was swapped out to be "upgraded" to the TOS bridge.
Don't get your hopes up, this is the new one.Ship still looks wrong on the new Short Trek. Hopefully one day we’ll get the proper Enterprise.
I think we can safely say the Short Treks Enterprise is the 2245-2265 bridge (The Cage and Where No Man Has Gone Before was a backup bridge module while the true bridge was undergoing refits. Installation of holographic functions in the Cage, and in the case of 2265 the upgrade to Kirk's TOS bridge, with the side benefit that Pike's often malfunctioning bridge with holographic issues, even after deactivated, wouldn't interfere with the trip past the galactic barrier).Ship still looks wrong on the new Short Trek. Hopefully one day we’ll get the proper Enterprise.
Why do magicians take pains to keep their magic tricks a secret when everyone knows they don't actually have magical powers? Why do writers even bother to acknowledge or even read/watch previous works if the audience all knows it's fake?Why does anything need to fit? Why are some trek fans completely incapable of accepting differences in the appearance of ships or bridges as just being different productions values due to 50 years having passed between the original and new versions?
Why do magicians take pains to keep their magic tricks a secret when everyone knows they don't actually have magical powers? Why do writers even bother to acknowledge or even read/watch previous works if the audience all knows it's fake?
Why did Tolkien revise the Hobbit to match his LOTR revision that Bilbo found the ring accidentally instead of getting it as a gift from Gollum?
We want to keep the illusion of an actual fictional world. If that offends anyone, then they don't have to take part in those discussions.
I don't see the point in learning klingon but I'm not going around protesting against those who do.I don't find it offensive, I just don't see the point of it. I don't need convoluted explanations for why things look different. In fact trying to have explanations for why Klingons didn't have ridges in TOS but did in TMP for example, detracts from my enjoyment of the fictional world.
I just don't get it and it's the least relateable aspect of trek fandom for me.
Why does anything need to fit? Why are some trek fans completely incapable of accepting differences in the appearance of ships or bridges as just being different productions values due to 50 years having passed between the original and new versions?
Please no Kurtzman version of TOS!!!!!!!
I go back and forth. On the one hand, I can totally rationalize away any differences, either from a RW production perspective. On the other hand, I can take the GR POV that TOS was a dramatic recreation of Kirk's missions, explaining any discrepancies or differences as a dramatic license or some aspects being classified by Starfleet.I don't find it offensive, I just don't see the point of it. I don't need convoluted explanations for why things look different. In fact trying to have explanations for why Klingons didn't have ridges in TOS but did in TMP for example, detracts from my enjoyment of the fictional world.
I just don't get it and it's the least relateable aspect of trek fandom for me.
I read that as out-of-date pants.Why would they send Kirk to the edge of the galaxy with out-of-date parts?
I read that as out-of-date pants.![]()
Sorry, Yistaan. No way are the pilot uniforms dress uniforms. Their construction is too shoddy and their aesthetics too unflattering to make good dress uniforms to be worn for ceremonial occasions requiring pomp and circumstance.I think we can safely say the Short Treks Enterprise is the 2245-2265 bridge (The Cage and Where No Man Has Gone Before was a backup bridge module while the true bridge was undergoing refits. Installation of holographic functions in the Cage, and in the case of 2265 the upgrade to Kirk's TOS bridge, with the side benefit that Pike's often malfunctioning bridge with holographic issues, even after deactivated, wouldn't interfere with the trip past the galactic barrier).
The Cage and WNMHGB uniforms are Starfleet dress uniforms. In the Cage, they were still wearing them for what was supposed to be an admission of Rigel VII to the Federation that went horribly wrong (per the Early Voyages comic book). In WNMHGB, the historic event of passing the Galactic Barrier necessitated dress uniforms. They then switch to the TOS uniform.
Pike using the Short Treks uniform in 2254 and saying they were brand new in 2257 is backed up by Constitution class vessels getting special uniforms, with them being issued to the rest of the fleet in 2257. This comes from the Discovery Desperate Hours novel.
There, it all fits. It is unlikely to be contradicted because it is "highly unlikely" (to quote Data) that CBS is going to retread the Enterprise in 2266-2269. Even the Pike show is still a long shot.
Good idea!Sorry, Yistaan. No way are the pilot uniforms dress uniforms. Their construction is too shoddy and their aesthetics too unflattering to make good dress uniforms to be worn for ceremonial occasions requiring pomp and circumstance.
I would suggest instead that the pilot uniforms are Class-B duty uniforms roughly equivalent to Kirk's white short sleeve pseudo T-shirt from TMP and the beige long sleeve and short sleeve equivalents worn by Sulu, Uhura, and Chekov in the same film. Then, I would suggest that the Discovery variants are the more formal Class-A, but still not dress, duty uniforms of that period.
I read that as out-of-date pants.![]()
It wasn't his 'pants' that were out of date.This could be why he was always in a hurry to take them off whenever an attractive alien came along.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.