Agreed. And yet I’ve seen arguments saying the tech must look futuristic else people won’t buy it - even if you explicitly point out to them what you’ve just saidDon’t forget there was ww3 and we don’t know what’s underlying tech that otherwise looks similar to today’s tech.
So it might look like tubes from the 60s but it’s not? I’m actually ok with that - the tech has to have a futuristic *function* not a futuristic look - for me it could look like it runs on coal so long as it does something we can’t do in the 21st century (but could do by the 23rd).None of the Trek tech may be made from today’s materials.
I love this idea. It makes so much sense - didn’t you also suggest a while back that the hologram buttons could be reconfigured depending on what the console is being used for? To my mind, this idea truly updates the TOS controls - rather than just replacing them with iPads because that’s futuristic to non trekkers I guess?I always thought the classic enterprise controls could just be hologram switches, and LCD displays
Every so often the doctor changes the desktop themeThat's kinda how I rationalize the switches and tech in Doctor who.
Tom Paris and the Delta Flyer agrees - probably because it makes sense!switches and analogue levers are always more reliable and robust in their toughness.
Agreed. And yet I’ve seen arguments saying the tech must look futuristic else people won’t buy it - even if you explicitly point out to them what you’ve just said
So it might look like tubes from the 60s but it’s not? I’m actually ok with that - the tech has to have a futuristic *function* not a futuristic look - for me it could look like it runs on coal so long as it does something we can’t do in the 21st century (but could do by the 23rd).
I love this idea. It makes so much sense - didn’t you also suggest a while back that the hologram buttons could be reconfigured depending on what the console is being used for? To my mind, this idea truly updates the TOS controls - rather than just replacing them with iPads because that’s futuristic to non trekkers I guess?
Every so often the doctor changes the desktop theme
Tom Paris and the Delta Flyer agrees - probably because it makes sense!
Maybe the Enterprise bridge will incorporate more tactile switches (I doubt the awesome holo buttons idea will have occurred to them) because she’s an older ship than the disco? I suppose we’d expect the disco to have more touch screens as the timeline approaches the TNG era.
The Tardis is perhaps somewhat more of a living creature than the Enterprise as well - with the tardis I always thought (in later years anyway) that it was more like the ship was healing an appendage rather than replacing a damaged circuit. And of course the doctor has the old sonic to help things along...!In the case of the Doctor's TARDIS, the ship has something similar to replicators, but much more advanced, call Matter Projectors
Definitely. Some kind of fabrication plant where the engineers actually engineer things! Cue DSC having them in leather aprons and steampunk goggles - but I suppose the concept would be there!I would imagine a TOS enterprise having a workshop with extra parts for all their systems.
I wonder whether that android lady on the disco can interface with the ship?Until Human Beings actually evolve to the point where we don't need to use our hands/fingers, there is always going to be a need for physical controls and interfaces, even if just for backup purposes.
I doubt very much that will have happened by the 23rd Century.
![]()
Season 1 Enterprise already looks different than the one in Season 2 TeaserThe Anovos model is altered from the one in S1.
Don’t forget there was ww3 and we don’t know what’s underlying tech that otherwise looks similar to today’s tech. Earth is in the equivalent to the renaissance or enlightenment after a short dark ages. None of the Trek tech may be made from today’s materials. No toxic aluminium etc etc. Something people forget is how environmentally unfriendly our tech is.
Is that 100% confirmed? Because if so...Why Eaglemoss sizes are different than ones from the Official Starship Collection book? Do they just make up these numbers, is no one in charge of this stuff?
Someone gives a shit, they might have just messed up the number from another ship.Obviously, nobody who gives a chit, anyway.
![]()
They’re referring to a post I deleted about the Cardenas’ class size as I put it in the wrong thread. They responded too fastIs that 100% confirmed? Because if so...
You know, the more the Anovos model is shown, the better it gets. On this picture it looks the part quite well. I'm starting to like it a lot.
![]()
Get rid of the saucer, the neck, the support struts, the nacelles and thin out the secondary hull, and I would agree with you.![]()
Seems to me like you don't like the original so much.
I love the original
not fond of the "25% different" version.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.