• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?

How do we know the missing windows on the original were not a mistake?

We've learned quite a bit about the mistakes made through various books about the production. But... I'll give you that someone may have thought it a mistake since most of that side of the model was never designed to be filmed.
 
Could you post some pictures comparing the two. Because I've never thought the Enterprise ever looked like anything from Flash Gordon.
latest

Maybe if you stick two of these on another and add a saucer?
 
We've learned quite a bit about the mistakes made through various books about the production. But... I'll give you that someone may have thought it a mistake since most of that side of the model was never designed to be filmed.
Hm, I hadn't considered the shooting angles.
 
Mistakes get made. They are clearly mistakes based on the original article they are supposed to be emulating.
Not necessarily.

I'm not speaking for the artists, but they might have been regarded as corrections or, if you will, completions. The left side of the original model was incomplete. Any feature on the port side of the ship that lies in the blank/unfinished part of the model isn't a mistake, is it? The artists doing the new versions might have simply made the judgment that these windows kind of fell into a similar category, and decided something like that if money were no object the original model would have had them.
 
Not necessarily.

I'm not speaking for the artists, but they might have been regarded as corrections or, if you will, completions. The left side of the original model was incomplete. Any feature on the port side of the ship that lies in the blank/unfinished part of the model isn't a mistake, is it? The artists doing the new versions might have simply made the judgment that these windows kind of fell into a similar category, and decided something like that if money were no object the original model would have had them.

I beat you to the punch! :techman:

We've learned quite a bit about the mistakes made through various books about the production. But... I'll give you that someone may have thought it a mistake since most of that side of the model was never designed to be filmed.
 
How do we know the missing windows on the original were not a mistake?
It was not a mistake: it was a choice. The port side was never intended to be filmed. Which is why you get this curious artifact:
metamorphosishd1194 (1).jpg
My comment was not intended to be all that serious, but the model is what it is. If changing the model is necessary for symmetry's sake, then adding the secondary hull feature seems more imperative than mirroring the window array.
 
I went to YouTube for the original/remastered comparisons, and at least in Shore Leave, they look to be there at 1:29
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
In the original "Shore Leave," mirror images of the stock shots were used.

That off-beat feel coming right out the VFX for an off-beat episode is something that's lost in the TOS-R upgrade, by the way.
 
Could you post some pictures comparing the two. Because I've never thought the Enterprise ever looked like anything from Flash Gordon.

They both have simplistic shapes and both feature very smooth low detailed ships. It's very much a product of 1930's-1960's TV, the Flash Gordon era.

It was good for the 1960's TV show on a small cathode ray TV. It didn't look good enough for the 70's bigscreen and it certainly doesn't look good enough now on a 4k flatscreen. Whenever it's appeared in more modern Trek it's always just been about nostalgia, not about being a main player. It's time the show moved on from that nostalgia.
 
I have a question for y'all:

If DSC's final scene had the Enterprise looking like the Phase II model as it was supposed to be built, what would you think?
 
I wish I could've seen it in the theater.

Me too.

Thing is, that movie was also from Paramount. It came after TWOK.

Seems to me, if the TOS Enterprise was so outdated, why didn't they just use some footage from the refit? That film was already in the form necessary for theaters. To use the old TOS footage, they had to take extra steps to get the old film into the correct format.
 
I have a question for y'all:

If DSC's final scene had the Enterprise looking like the Phase II model as it was supposed to be built, what would you think?
I’d have probably argued that we know what the Enterprise looked like around the time of “the cage” but that there are probably very good reasons why the Enterprise looked like the Phase II model - a refit, “war” variant, or whatever. There’s no reason why there can’t be an in-universe, logical reason why the ship looks different other than “just ignore the differences it’s a visual reboot”.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top