• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

USS Enterprise (eventually) on Discovery?

Do we have an official length for canon? Because I know there are arguments regarding the sets themselves not being able to fit at a certain length in the TOS Enterprise.
You know I was just about to edit my post to ask that very question. I don’t think it was ever officially stated anywhere in tos
 
Do we have an official length for canon? Because I know there are arguments regarding the sets themselves not being able to fit at a certain length in the TOS Enterprise.
Just checked memory alpha - they state:

“That being said and oddly enough, neither dimension has actually ever been canonicallyconfirmed, as neither dimension was ever seen or referred to in any of the live-action Star Trek productions.”

My original question has been rendered moot.

Dagnabbit.
 
You know I was just about to edit my post to ask that very question. I don’t think it was ever officially stated anywhere in tos
As pointed out by another poster recently, this is canon, complete with scale in feet, from "The Enterprise Incident":

http://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/3x02hd/theenterpriseincidenthd0198.jpg

Do we have an official length for canon? Because I know there are arguments regarding the sets themselves not being able to fit at a certain length in the TOS Enterprise.
 
As pointed out by another poster recently, this is canon, complete with scale in feet, from "The Enterprise Incident":

http://tos.trekcore.com/hd/albums/3x02hd/theenterpriseincidenthd0198.jpg
Memory Alpha cited that too - I think that’s the most compelling evidence for the scale of the prime Enterprise.

I guess it’s never been mentioned in dialogue and the screen display in the Enterprise incident would count as “visuals” and the visuals have been rebooted so the producers of DSC can ignore it (I don’t agree with that rationale by the way, but I think that’s what tptb would argue). The Enterprise could become a mile long now if the only evidence of her being smaller comes from a visual source.
 
Well if that scale chart from Eaglemoss is correct that it is not even half a mile long, more like a Quarter.
 
All of the Klingon ships have Klingon names (except T'Kuvma's ship). DSC isn't alone in that, I think nearly every Klingon ship design after TOS has had a Klingon name.

They're probably making D-7 the Federation designation.
 
Last edited:
The U.S. and it's allies had their own names for all the Soviet aircraft (and Japanese WWII aircraft) if I recall. Not sure if those names were in any way translations of the Russian names.
 
The U.S. and it's allies had their own names for all the Soviet aircraft (and Japanese WWII aircraft) if I recall. Not sure if those names were in any way translations of the Russian names.

For the Soviet Aircraft at least, the NATO names were unrelated to whatever the Russian name was, they just chose a word that started with a letter to designate the type of aircraft.

For example, fighter aircraft were all given reporting names starting with 'F' (Frogfoot, Fullback) Helicopters were given 'H' names (Hind, Hip)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_reporting_name

We saw Harry Kim identify a Klingon ship as a D-7.
And that changes my idea how?
 
All of the Klingon ships have Klingon names (except T'Kuvma's ship). DSC isn't alone in that, I think nearly every Klingon ship design after TOS has had a Klingon name.

They're probably making D-7 the Federation designation.
They did that with romulan ships in TNG too - the d’deridex was the “b-type” iirc.

Always wondered what an “a-type” warbird looked like
 
289-305 meters in length. Unless you're high or just don't care, in which case 750 meters with warp nacelles that expand to a kilometer each when in use or during sweeps week.
 
How does the rescaled upsizing fit into the visual reboot of canon? I get them changing the visuals, uniforms, etc. But doesn’t changing the size of the ship cause an issue? Are there still only around 400 or so crew on the Enterprise or has that doubled? And if they’re sticking to “facts and events” then how does the Enterprise having twice as many crewmembers affect the stories that followed? Wouldn’t it take twice as long for the whole crew to beam down to the spore planet where Kirk hit Spock til the spores left his brain? Wouldn’t that mean that story would alter as Spock would have longer spore exposure so Kirk now can’t knock them out of him with a karate chop? If the crew is different does that mean that different interpersonal relationships could occur and the guy who died in “balance of terror” might not have been marrying the same woman? Or maybe he worked in a different department? Or maybe now the ship doesn’t have a pod for Kirk to jettison in the ion storm?

I submit that the upscaling of the Enterprise alters the facts and events that we know follow on from discovery. Unless... (I sound like Rom).
I'm pretty sure the prevailing feeling at CBS these days is that TOS isn't canon, just something very vaguely like it and the rest of Trek "happened", with different looks and events transpiring differently (i.e. Kirk and Spock wouldn't be amazed by the "theoretically possible" cloaking device in "Balance of Terror" because it's tech the Klingons have had and used all along)

In other words, it's not the same universe as TOS.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top