• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Trekker's 10 Worst Product Placements in TV/Movies

The Island -- why do clones who don't know anything about the outside world need a big huge sign telling them their video game is on Xbox?
That was the first thing that came to mind for me, too. Hilariously blatant and absurd.
 
9 - I, Robot - Converse Shoes:
There was a LOT of product placements in this movie.
A lot. But Converse is the one that sticks out the most in my mind. Moments into the movie Will Smith's character -a technophobic Chicago policeman- opens up a package containing something he bought off eBay. Inside the package? Some Converse shoes circa 2004. The year? 2035. Yep. He bought 31 year old shoes off eBay, because he's so into them and apparently Chicago is plum out of vintage clothing stores. Oh, and the shoes are in near-perfect condition.

Think about this for a moment. Sure, vintage-style clothing is always a market but when's the last time you saw some shoes from 1978 that were anywhere near wearable?

Interestingly, this particular part of product placement didn't bother me as much as the Audi stuff. Not only, as another person mentioned, is Spooner driving around in what's basically a TT with stuff glued on but if you take a closer look at the film, there's basically nothing BUT Audis on the streets. And this, people, is the truly disturbing part of this vision of the future, not the robots taking over.

The JCV stereo set probably also deserves an honorable mention.


5. Demolition Man - Taco Bell
This movie takes place sometime in 2030s. In it Taco Bell is the only restaurant in the country somehow surviving the "franchise wars" that happened decades earlier, "now all restaurants are Taco Bell!" The restaurant is also regarded as fine-dining and, it seems, no restaurant, ever, since these "franchise wars" has tried to enter the market to, you know, give people something different to eat.

I agree with The Borgified Corpse who said this was a joke well integrated in the film. I certainly found it quite amusing (and Spartan's reaction is priceless).

And I can confirm that it's Pizza Hut in the European version.


4. Casino Royale - Omega Watches
Bond and Vesper are talking and she notices his watch. "Rolex?" she asks. "Omega," Bond answers. "Beautiful." she purrs. Uh-huh.

Actually, I found all the Sony Ericsson stuff to be far worse and more distracting, to be honest.
 
9 - I, Robot - Converse Shoes:
There was a LOT of product placements in this movie.
A lot. But Converse is the one that sticks out the most in my mind. Moments into the movie Will Smith's character -a technophobic Chicago policeman- opens up a package containing something he bought off eBay. Inside the package? Some Converse shoes circa 2004. The year? 2035. Yep. He bought 31 year old shoes off eBay, because he's so into them and apparently Chicago is plum out of vintage clothing stores. Oh, and the shoes are in near-perfect condition.

Think about this for a moment. Sure, vintage-style clothing is always a market but when's the last time you saw some shoes from 1978 that were anywhere near wearable?

Interestingly, this particular part of product placement didn't bother me as much as the Audi stuff. Not only, as another person mentioned, is Spooner driving around in what's basically a TT with stuff glued on but if you take a closer look at the film, there's basically nothing BUT Audis on the streets. And this, people, is the truly disturbing part of this vision of the future, not the robots taking over.

The JCV stereo set probably also deserves an honorable mention.


5. Demolition Man - Taco Bell
This movie takes place sometime in 2030s. In it Taco Bell is the only restaurant in the country somehow surviving the "franchise wars" that happened decades earlier, "now all restaurants are Taco Bell!" The restaurant is also regarded as fine-dining and, it seems, no restaurant, ever, since these "franchise wars" has tried to enter the market to, you know, give people something different to eat.

I agree with The Borgified Corpse who said this was a joke well integrated in the film. I certainly found it quite amusing (and Spartan's reaction is priceless).

And I can confirm that it's Pizza Hut in the European version.


4. Casino Royale - Omega Watches
Bond and Vesper are talking and she notices his watch. "Rolex?" she asks. "Omega," Bond answers. "Beautiful." she purrs. Uh-huh.

Actually, I found all the Sony Ericsson stuff to be far worse and more distracting, to be honest.
I'm sure it's Taco Bell in the UK version... been a while since I watched it though.

I certainly found the Sony ones to be worse. Everything from Sony Viao, to the phone, to a Blu-Ray security system in the hotel.

And weren't the Converse in iRobot supposed to be new shoes that just happened to be vintage 2004 style?
 
^
Actually, you're right! I have the UK version and just checked.

However, the first time I saw the movie it was the German version. And I'm almost certain it was Pizza Hut.

I just did a brief internet search:

German Wikipedia has a reference in its Pizza Hut article which mentions that it's Taco Bell in the original.

There's also a mention on Wikia which I don't know.
 
You forgot the longest commercial of all time: Transformers. There's a clip on YouTube showing all of the placements in the film, and it's LONG. I have not seen the second one, so I don't know if it was just as bad or not.

You're probably thinking of this. It's two minutes, eighteen seconds long.

I'm not sure I'd count some of the more incidental stuff, like the soldier's iPod, as product placement. But the Panasonic memory card was shameless.

I dunno, the memory card was kind-of shameless, the iPod I think was bad but things like the USA Today and eBay are subtle and not as bad as the memory card or some of the others in that clip.
 
what about BTTF 2 and it's Nike trainers, Texaco garage and Black and Decker dustbuster and rehydrater? okay, the last one's a futuristic gimmick, but it's got a B&D logo on it.

and wasn't the pizza from Pizza Hut?

not to mention 'Pepsi' getting mentioned in the Cafe 80s...

and of course, Flight of the Navigator with it's 'can i get a Coke' scene...
 
With Back to the Future and its sequels, the product placement is a convenient way to show how much things have changed in whatever time period the characters are in. The jokes are funnier because they are specific. It's a different type of product placement than the Cheerios box in Superman.
 
With Back to the Future and its sequels, the product placement is a convenient way to show how much things have changed in whatever time period the characters are in. The jokes are funnier because they are specific.
Indeed, if I want a Pepsi, I still need to pay for it. :lol:
 
9 - I, Robot - Converse Shoes:
There was a LOT of product placements in this movie.
A lot. But Converse is the one that sticks out the most in my mind. Moments into the movie Will Smith's character -a technophobic Chicago policeman- opens up a package containing something he bought off eBay. Inside the package? Some Converse shoes circa 2004. The year? 2035. Yep. He bought 31 year old shoes off eBay, because he's so into them and apparently Chicago is plum out of vintage clothing stores. Oh, and the shoes are in near-perfect condition.

Think about this for a moment. Sure, vintage-style clothing is always a market but when's the last time you saw some shoes from 1978 that were anywhere near wearable?

The thing that bothered me the most about the Converse stuff in this movie, is that they actually worked it into dialogue, for crissakes. He actually discusses his Converse shoes with other characters! Yeesh. :rolleyes:

But in defence of your last point, I've purchased Vision Street Wear shoes circa 1985 from an online company that has stock overflows. Those were over 20 years old and in perfect condition.
 
UK TV as just been given the go a head for product placement can't wait to see what shows come up with.
 
(looks over at DVD rack) the Reebok logo on the foot of the Bob-omb in the Super Mario Bros. movie, the whole Sony cellphone thing in Advent Children, BTTF gets a pass, and the rest are Samurai movies...
 
Home Alone turned into a Godsend for the company that made those voice-recorders. They weren't really even for sale until after that movie made them so popular.
 
Best (and most cruel) product placement: The Batman Vs. Superman teaser poster from I Am Legend. Given the teaser campaign lead times, it's possible this movie didn't even make it out of post-production or at best is eternally stored away, never to be seen...
Is that product placement though or an injoke?

(If you don't know: the producer included that because he had been working on a Batman Vs. Superman for over a year before Warner Brothers pulled out in favor of Batman Begins)
 
I'm embarassed to admit that I've seen it, but Seventh Heaven, late in its run, had an episode that was practically an infomercial for Oreo Cookies. It was the most shameless use of product placement I've ever seen.

On the other hand, Fight Club is filled with product placement, but it's used in way that's pretty clever and not totally complementary of Starbucks, Ikea, and the other brands that show up.
 
Home Alone turned into a Godsend for the company that made those voice-recorders. They weren't really even for sale until after that movie made them so popular.

True, but that doesn't really count as product placement. Talk Boy was made up for the movie, and it was only after a letter writing campaign that it became an actual product.
 
With Back to the Future and its sequels, the product placement is a convenient way to show how much things have changed in whatever time period the characters are in. The jokes are funnier because they are specific. It's a different type of product placement than the Cheerios box in Superman.

Pretty much my POV. The product placements in BTTF2 wasn't as blatant or shameless as the others I mentioned. I mean, Smallville did an entire episode centered around Stride Gum! That hard compared to the "product placements" in Back to the Future which, as mentioned, was put in there as commentary to changing times. It's not nearly as shameless to have Lorraine mistake Marty's name as being Clavin from his designer underwear, the USA Today was commentary on corporations over taking news organizations, and Marty's shoes are only mentioned by name in BTTF-3 bu a confused cowboy and to Marty's (and the writers' credit) when he sees the truck he says, "Hey check out that 4x4!" Not, "Hey! Check out that late-model Toyota Tundra 4x4 with dual exhaust and chrome tips!" or something similar.

Nah, the product placement in the BTTF movies -for me- isn't as shameless as having your main character covet, buy, and wear 30-year-old shoes!
 
in movies like BTTF product placement was, well, natural, not every vehicle was a Dodge(tm), there weren't only McDonalds, Frisbee realy did start out as a pie plate manufacturer
 
in movies like BTTF product placement was, well, natural, not every vehicle was a Dodge(tm), there weren't only McDonalds, Frisbee realy did start out as a pie plate manufacturer
Yeah, product placement like that works for me. It's natural or funny, but the kind we've been getting lately is annoying.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top