And our streets would be even more crowded with addicts than they are now.
Probably not.
Why do you say that?
And our streets would be even more crowded with addicts than they are now.
Probably not.
^ Hmm. Well, you can have your weed, just leave me out of it.
Coffee, on the other hand...must have. MUST have.![]()
Since when is marijuana classified as a "narcotic"?I doubt very much, that narcotics would be a part of any truly utopian society.![]()
Since when is marijuana classified as a "narcotic"?I doubt very much, that narcotics would be a part of any truly utopian society.![]()
1932 in the United States.
You have a link for that? Because Wiki and several other sources point out it's NOT a narcotic. Just making it illegal does not accurately reclassify its scientific taxonomy...and frankly, lawmakers aren't even qualified to make such a declaration.Since when is marijuana classified as a "narcotic"?I doubt very much, that narcotics would be a part of any truly utopian society.![]()
1932 in the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NarcoticIn U.S. legal context, narcotic refers to opium, opium derivatives, and their semi-synthetic or fully synthetic substitutes "as well as cocaine and coca leaves," which although classified as "narcotics" in the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (CSA), are chemically not narcotics. Contrary to popular belief, marijuana is not a narcotic, nor are LSD and other psychedelic drugs.[4]
Many law enforcement officials in the United States inaccurately use the word "narcotic" to refer to any illegal drug or any unlawfully possessed drug. An example is referring to cannabis as a narcotic. Because the term is often used broadly, inaccurately or pejoratively outside medical contexts, most medical professionals prefer the more precise term opioid, which refers to natural, semi-synthetic, and synthetic substances that behave pharmacologically like morphine, the primary active constituent of natural opium poppy.
Nothing essentially wrong with either, but what we are working for is a good question to ask.
Thats the beauty of freedom isn't it? Were all able to have our opinions, make our own choices, do the things we feel are right.
Nothing essentially wrong with either, but what we are working for is a good question to ask.
A paycheck is a pretty good reason.
Thats the beauty of freedom isn't it? Were all able to have our opinions, make our own choices, do the things we feel are right.
Yep.
And this freedom extends to things like anti-smoking/drugs/alcohol ads, public service announcements, etc.
If you want to use a substance, that's one thing. But one shouldn't let that interfere with others' right to speak out against using that thing.
Since when is marijuana classified as a "narcotic"?![]()
1932 in the United States.
1932?
^
SpockWeed is the name I thought up for Trek BBS in 2001, and now use it on almost every forum I participate in. Though this is the only place I use the Yoda Avatar and have started a thread like this.
I guess the name came up since in regular life most people don't know that I may partake, I have fond memories of watching WPIX TOS late night reruns after a nice evening jay, and I thought Trek fans to be open people for the most part. There is no underlying psycological reason to make it known, since in fact most people don't know. It's not that big a part of my life, but it is a huge part of my Trek fandom.
I tried another name at first, Spock's Dream or something, but it was taken.
and legal for those who want to speak against it.
Were you just kidding then about the coffee?It's just that I have run into too many of the pro-legalization crowd who think that I am some kind of uptight fascist reactionary for daring to be against drugs of any kind ...
and legal for those who want to speak against it.
Well, as long as you grant me that freedom, I guess we're okay.
It's just that I have run into too many of the pro-legalization crowd who think that I am some kind of uptight fascist reactionary for daring to be against drugs of any kind, and who would love to censor not only me personally, but also things like the Truth.com ads (which I happen to enjoy).
So as long as you don't try to stop me from speaking out (not even right here on this board), I won't interfere with you either. Fair enough?
I'm sure the USS Kingston probably has a more liberal policy on the smoking of weed...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingston,_Jamaica
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.