Morphing would be terrible.
I want engineers to go in there and take it apart.
Touché. Still ain’t gonna happen though

Morphing would be terrible.
I want engineers to go in there and take it apart.

Nope, would defeat the whole purpose.And then we burn the other episodes.
And then we burn the other episodes.

Stat Trek has little in the way of official, organized continuity - it's revised and overwritten almost whimsically.
Because Trek has never had a plan or overall "vision." Each incarnation rolls along, as long as it's meeting the studio's expectations for success - until it doesn't.
At which point, new folks take the helm and change the emphasis and details of the thing.
The "history" of Khan is one example. The global war(s) lying in our immediate future are another...as are the Klingons mentioned uptopic.
When the folks running the show change, the framing of "canon" changes to suit their requirements. That's the way Star Trek has always worked.
Part of the reason Star Trek became such a cultural staple is because it was largely able to withstand scrutiny, rewarding those who paid attention to the intricate details. This only increased the entertainment value and desire for rewatching.
Roddenberry's memo-stated rule was "believability". This required consistency, and Star Trek provided more of it than most any other science fiction setting for decades . . . even as folks like Arthur C. Clarke threw in the towel on continuity within his 2001 novel series.
Meanwhile, by the end of the Berman era, it was forty years of various productions, each the work of many, many hands. The fact any of it hung together at all was remarkable, the fact it meshes rather well a miracle, but it was also no accident. The willingness to discard that effort and the continuity it resulted in, a continuity that brought so many so much deeper into Trek in the first place, is just . . . ugh.
Alternatively, in a little while they'll be able to economically upgrade TOS to the levels of production of current Star Trek.
Hell, the AI ought to be able to tweak the blocking of scenes shot on the original Enterprise sets to fit the characters on a virtual set matching SNW's.
Maybe they'll continue to release the already HD-altered episodes on physical media alongside the modernized ones. Or not. Who can say?![]()

If they should ever want a TOS set, which so far they haven't.Do not need to build TOS sets when they already exist in Ticonderoga NY.
If they should ever want a TOS set, which so far they haven't.
I'm not sure, BTW, that the sets in Ticonderoga would work for them in terms of logistics, layout, even available power in the building. Not saying those are problems, just that they can be.
In any event, for a bunch of reasons if they needed such sets for more than a week or so or for extensive use it would be much cheaper and more efficient to duplicate them at the Star Trek stages.
Do not need to build TOS sets when they already exist in Ticonderoga NY.
BTW, the exhibits in Ticonderoga are first-rate, but would not hold up in HD. What was painted wood ar Desilu is still painted wood.Which is irrelevant since they aren’t going to film with them.
60th anniversary fluff. Which obviously also means that if they were going to do it, or something similar, it’s already done.It isn't so much a question of if they can do it. It's more a question of why they would do it.
60th anniversary fluff. Which obviously also means that if they were going to do it, or something similar, it’s already done.
Although I highly doubt they will do it, overdosing fans on nostalgia seems to be a constant and unending fact about modern TrekIt isn't so much a question of if they can do it. It's more a question of why they would do it.
You've got to admit, "Nostalgia" is one helluva drug, so many people are addicted to it.Although I highly doubt they will do it, overdosing fans on nostalgia seems to be a constant and unending fact about modern Trek
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.