• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Transition and explanation of SNW into TOS technology

I've said this before and I'll say it again. My dream episode of Strange New Worlds for the 60th anniversary would be pure nostalgia bait, but done in a way that quietly proves the aesthetic difference is only skin deep.

For one episode the show would look exactly like The Original Series. The interiors would be a faithful recreation of the 1960s sets and the exterior shots would use the TOS Enterprise, ideally filmed with an actual physical model.

Everything else would remain completely normal.

The cast would act exactly as they do in every other episode, just wearing TOS era uniforms. The story would play out like any other SNW episode and nobody in universe would acknowledge that anything looks different.

No jokes about it. No lampshading it. No explanation.

It would just be a regular episode that happens to look like TOS.

Then the next week the show goes right back to the modern SNW visual style like nothing happened.

To me that would be the perfect 60th anniversary tribute. Not a parody, not a meta episode, just a quiet reminder that despite the visual differences, it is all the same Enterprise and the same story.
 
Alternatively, in a little while they'll be able to economically upgrade TOS to the levels of production of current Star Trek.

Hell, the AI ought to be able to tweak the blocking of scenes shot on the original Enterprise sets to fit the characters on a virtual set matching SNW's.

Maybe they'll continue to release the already HD-altered episodes on physical media alongside the modernized ones. Or not. Who can say? ;)
 
Stat Trek has little in the way of official, organized continuity - it's revised and overwritten almost whimsically.

ThatsBait.png


... and not just because you misspelled "Star Trek", of all things.

Because Trek has never had a plan or overall "vision." Each incarnation rolls along, as long as it's meeting the studio's expectations for success - until it doesn't.

At which point, new folks take the helm and change the emphasis and details of the thing.

The "history" of Khan is one example. The global war(s) lying in our immediate future are another...as are the Klingons mentioned uptopic.

When the folks running the show change, the framing of "canon" changes to suit their requirements. That's the way Star Trek has always worked.

Inasmuch as production teams can ignore prior works and have no plan or vision, you're obviously not wrong. The 2009+ Paramount and 2017+ CBS-cum-Paramount productions prove that.

But, as I said (earlier in this thread) . . .

Part of the reason Star Trek became such a cultural staple is because it was largely able to withstand scrutiny, rewarding those who paid attention to the intricate details. This only increased the entertainment value and desire for rewatching.

Roddenberry's memo-stated rule was "believability". This required consistency, and Star Trek provided more of it than most any other science fiction setting for decades . . . even as folks like Arthur C. Clarke threw in the towel on continuity within his 2001 novel series.

And:

Meanwhile, by the end of the Berman era, it was forty years of various productions, each the work of many, many hands. The fact any of it hung together at all was remarkable, the fact it meshes rather well a miracle, but it was also no accident. The willingness to discard that effort and the continuity it resulted in, a continuity that brought so many so much deeper into Trek in the first place, is just . . . ugh.

Far from whimsical, great effort has been put on maintaining consistency . . . at least in some Star Trek branded productions.
 
Alternatively, in a little while they'll be able to economically upgrade TOS to the levels of production of current Star Trek.

Hell, the AI ought to be able to tweak the blocking of scenes shot on the original Enterprise sets to fit the characters on a virtual set matching SNW's.

Maybe they'll continue to release the already HD-altered episodes on physical media alongside the modernized ones. Or not. Who can say? ;)

I’ve heard that CBS/Paramount have already begun that project. ;)
 
Do not need to build TOS sets when they already exist in Ticonderoga NY.
If they should ever want a TOS set, which so far they haven't.

I'm not sure, BTW, that the sets in Ticonderoga would work for them in terms of logistics, layout, even available power in the building. Not saying those are problems, just that they can be.

In any event, for a bunch of reasons if they needed such sets for more than a week or so or for extensive use it would be much cheaper and more efficient to duplicate them at the Star Trek stages.
 
If they should ever want a TOS set, which so far they haven't.

I'm not sure, BTW, that the sets in Ticonderoga would work for them in terms of logistics, layout, even available power in the building. Not saying those are problems, just that they can be.

In any event, for a bunch of reasons if they needed such sets for more than a week or so or for extensive use it would be much cheaper and more efficient to duplicate them at the Star Trek stages.

Annoying but doable. It's a relatively straightforward process to bring in a large generator and AC unit on flatbeds. Soundproofing would probably be the biggest issue, but you could just loop everything.
 
Do not need to build TOS sets when they already exist in Ticonderoga NY.

Alternately, they find a unique way to troll everyone by expanding on this guy's work, which would evade TOS and SNW both:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If they could recreate the Defiant sets for Enterprise Season 4, and the Enterprise-D bridge for Picard Season 3, they can certainly build something special for the 60th Anniversary and Strange New Worlds. This is especially true when you consider the budget flexibility they get from filming in Ontario.
 
It isn't so much a question of if they can do it. It's more a question of why they would do it.
60th anniversary fluff. Which obviously also means that if they were going to do it, or something similar, it’s already done.
 
60th anniversary fluff. Which obviously also means that if they were going to do it, or something similar, it’s already done.

I'd bet that something like that would have been mentioned or hinted at on the Star Trek cruise I went on, as it was the 60th anniversary cruise. But I didn't hear about anything like that. Not conclusive evidence, of course, but I'd be very surprised if this happens.
 
It isn't so much a question of if they can do it. It's more a question of why they would do it.
Although I highly doubt they will do it, overdosing fans on nostalgia seems to be a constant and unending fact about modern Trek
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top