Should further Trek movies (after STXI) or TV series rely on time travel to propel their story lines or should Star Trek return to more basic story telling?
I refuse to vote because of the given options. Just because you don't think Time Travel has been overdone in Trek, doesn't mean you'd want "Time travel stories galore".
On this BBS?I refuse to vote because of the given options. Just because you don't think Time Travel has been overdone in Trek, doesn't mean you'd want "Time travel stories galore".
Stop nitpicking. It's just a simple yes or no answer.
Should further Trek movies (after STXI) or TV series rely on time travel to propel their story lines or should Star Trek return to more basic story telling?
Well, I object to the terminology 'galore', because nothing is good if it is done to death.
However, I have no objection to time travel stories, in moderation. I like time travel.
Doctor Who and Quantum Leap sorta have the market cornered in terms of time travel as a theme to center an entire show around, however.![]()
Why does everyone (OK not everyone, but some) focus on the word galore. The word changes nothing. It's a simple yes or no question. Time travel or no time travel. The point is should it be given a rest in Star Trek.
Why does everyone (OK not everyone, but some) focus on the word galore. The word changes nothing. It's a simple yes or no question. Time travel or no time travel. The point is should it be given a rest in Star Trek.
They focus on it because it completely changes that response from "Yes, I like time travel in Trek" to "I want time travel in Trek ALL THE TIME"
Personally, I didn't vote because my response would be that I don't care as long as the stories are good.
Time travel has been done to death by Star Trek. Every Star Trek television series had featured time travel in some aspect. The timeline should be so polluted by now it's not even funny.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.