• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

to protect the future, keep the past alive

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gene created specific rules, and practices for star trek. The two series that kept to them, TOS and TNG did extremely well.
Actually that was network standards and practices.

The series since then, well, lets just say they did about as well as an alien that cant drink alcohol at a beer convention in 1930s munich.

They kept to standard morals board guidelines for things like sex and nudity. That meant, no boys bending boys over behind the ops consol during lunch, or girls licking each other silly behind Galileo 7 during break times.
I'm sure if your only exposure to gay characters is in porn, you might think that. But they do more than just have sex. Like their jobs or enjoying a meal.
As a result you did not have that homosexual mumbo jumbo in TOS. You had NORMAL male female relations that were in every other tv show and movie since time began. And you also had inter racial things going, not just Uhura and Kirk. You guys only see inter racial as being black and white. There was a large amount of non black and non white people in star trek for regular charecters, special stars of the week, and back ground people.
It was so great that white people were totally in charge. It's so unfair now, a white man can't even openly say slurs without subhumans getting upset.

Its just YOUR racist view point that lets you over look all of that and say TOS, and star trek itself is racist because it lacked your perverted sense that ALL command officers must be black or female. TOS had lots of females in command. Its just that the female uniforms keeps you from paying any attention to something other then their legs.
Yes, we're the racist ones for not wanting minorities left to be background characters only. The poor oppressed white man deserves his time to shine.

TOS had homosexual actors in it, all the series have. Its just that in the last 20 years that actors have been using orientation as a crutch to prop up flagging careers and to get roles that wouldn't have gone to them other wise. SO many actors and actresses are doing that.
Yes, that's the only reason people come out of the closest, to save their careers. It has nothing to do with living openly as who they really are. You're so insightful for someone still living in the early 20th century.

In TNG we had lots of openly non heterosexual romances and charecters. I remember several major episodes that were basically Riker finding a new gender bender romantic partner and screwing things up because of that.
One episode if I recalls, the character he got interested in on an away mission had to get gender reassignment surgery/mental reprogramming anyway to deal with the aborhent thoughts.
Yeah, the episode where Riker fell in love with the feminine alien who identified as female played by a woman. It was a bold choice, I'm not sure how the show didn't get cancelled. Good thing they fixed it, you can't have people wanting to be different from the majority. It just makes the less intelligent uncomfortable.

the addition of adding in homosexual characters and actors just for ratings, viewership, and sponsor ship is just a sick by product of the times. SO many shows have done that and simply gone missing from tv for good the following season..
Yes shows like Doctor Who, Game of Thrones and Orange is the New Black, all forgotten duds.

The addition of gay characters has been done well in various shows. Barney Miller was notable for having non traditional characters. And the charectoers were done well. They were humans with normal problems.
One episode the recurring gay store thief steals some nice hand bags. When caught and questioned, hes asked why and replies "they looked nice". And hes only mocked as "what kind of moron steals a purse without a wallet in it"
Since that show ended before I was born I have nothing to add.

And that's not how the new discovery has been promising. It was promised it would be a political addition of non hetero charecters. That means, homosexual sex in buckets, and guys running around in mini skirts demanding to be called "ms" and "honey". Basically bad show time porno shows.
Yes, the show should only appeal to bigots stuck in the 1950s who are oddly obsessed with gay people. Terrified that any single reference will corrupt them. Truly a bold future for the franchise.
 
TOS had homosexual actors in it, all the series have. Its just that in the last 20 years that actors have been using orientation as a crutch to prop up flagging careers and to get roles that wouldn't have gone to them other wise. SO many actors and actresses are doing that.

Such as?

the addition of adding in homosexual characters and actors just for ratings, viewership, and sponsor ship is just a sick by product of the times. SO many shows have done that and simply gone missing from tv for good the following season..

For instance?

It was promised it would be a political addition of non hetero charecters. That means, homosexual sex in buckets, and guys running around in mini skirts demanding to be called "ms" and "honey". Basically bad show time porno shows.

Does it? Why?

Spot stops and thinks a second....you know this guy's not replying? This may well be a prank...
 
Such as?



For instance?



Does it? Why?

Spot stops and thinks a second....you know this guy's not replying? This may well be a prank...

Yes, the OP seems to have a tendency to start complaint topics and then either never respond to them or respond once just to tell people to "pay attention." Physician, heal thyself?
 
*headdesk*

Sweetie, if non Cis/Het characters and individuals make you feel weird, might want to just turn off the TV, the internet, and never go outside. I hate to break it to you, but they aren't inventions of television and books, they kind of exist in that big place outside your basement as well.
 
Someone knows all about the new show before it's even been produced? Why don't more people know about the OP's uncanny ability to predict the future?
You'd think this would be big news...somewhere.
 
Gene created specific rules, and practices for star trek. The two series that kept to them, TOS and TNG did extremely well.

The series since then, well, lets just say they did about as well as an alien that cant drink alcohol at a beer convention in 1930s munich.

They kept to standard morals board guidelines for things like sex and nudity. That meant, no boys bending boys over behind the ops consol during lunch, or girls licking each other silly behind Galileo 7 during break times.
As a result you did not have that homosexual mumbo jumbo in TOS. You had NORMAL male female relations that were in every other tv show and movie since time began. And you also had inter racial things going, not just Uhura and Kirk. You guys only see inter racial as being black and white. There was a large amount of non black and non white people in star trek for regular charecters, special stars of the week, and back ground people.

Its just YOUR racist view point that lets you over look all of that and say TOS, and star trek itself is racist because it lacked your perverted sense that ALL command officers must be black or female. TOS had lots of females in command. Its just that the female uniforms keeps you from paying any attention to something other then their legs.

TOS had homosexual actors in it, all the series have. Its just that in the last 20 years that actors have been using orientation as a crutch to prop up flagging careers and to get roles that wouldn't have gone to them other wise. SO many actors and actresses are doing that.

In TNG we had lots of openly non heterosexual romances and charecters. I remember several major episodes that were basically Riker finding a new gender bender romantic partner and screwing things up because of that.
One episode if I recalls, the character he got interested in on an away mission had to get gender reassignment surgery/mental reprogramming anyway to deal with the aborhent thoughts.

the addition of adding in homosexual characters and actors just for ratings, viewership, and sponsor ship is just a sick by product of the times. SO many shows have done that and simply gone missing from tv for good the following season..

The addition of gay characters has been done well in various shows. Barney Miller was notable for having non traditional characters. And the charectoers were done well. They were humans with normal problems.
One episode the recurring gay store thief steals some nice hand bags. When caught and questioned, hes asked why and replies "they looked nice". And hes only mocked as "what kind of moron steals a purse without a wallet in it"

And that's not how the new discovery has been promising. It was promised it would be a political addition of non hetero charecters. That means, homosexual sex in buckets, and guys running around in mini skirts demanding to be called "ms" and "honey". Basically bad show time porno shows.

What is wrong with you? Seriously?

You ever actually pay attention to Star Trek. The first episode of TNG, from Roddenberry himself, had a man in a skirt.
 
It amazes me that some fans can scream about "Gene's vision" and then unload a ton of racist and bigoted garbage. I can understand liking the show for all the moving things and noises, my cat was a fan for those reasons alone, but to completely miss the point and try to pervert it is just stunning.
 
Bet y'all he doesn't show up again.

I mean, honestly, there's just so much wrong and offensive with what was said that I really don't have the time nor wherewithal to wade through the web of farts that is his post, but I did think it was highly amusing that his example of a positive portrayal of gay people is a show from thirty years ago that portrayed a gay stereotype as a villain.

I'm sure we'll see plenty more trolls attacking Discovery as time moves on.
 
yes, Gene had a vision...

image.jpg
 
You ever actually pay attention to Star Trek. The first episode of TNG, from Roddenberry himself, had a man in a skirt.
More to the point, the man wearing the skirt was seen quite frequently throughout the first season, the season Roddenberry was most heavily involved in.
 
Gene created specific rules, and practices for star trek. The two series that kept to them, TOS and TNG did extremely well.

The series since then, well, lets just say they did about as well as an alien that cant drink alcohol at a beer convention in 1930s munich.

They kept to standard morals board guidelines for things like sex and nudity. That meant, no boys bending boys over behind the ops consol during lunch, or girls licking each other silly behind Galileo 7 during break times.
As a result you did not have that homosexual mumbo jumbo in TOS. You had NORMAL male female relations that were in every other tv show and movie since time began. And you also had inter racial things going, not just Uhura and Kirk. You guys only see inter racial as being black and white. There was a large amount of non black and non white people in star trek for regular charecters, special stars of the week, and back ground people.

Its just YOUR racist view point that lets you over look all of that and say TOS, and star trek itself is racist because it lacked your perverted sense that ALL command officers must be black or female. TOS had lots of females in command. Its just that the female uniforms keeps you from paying any attention to something other then their legs.

TOS had homosexual actors in it, all the series have. Its just that in the last 20 years that actors have been using orientation as a crutch to prop up flagging careers and to get roles that wouldn't have gone to them other wise. SO many actors and actresses are doing that.

In TNG we had lots of openly non heterosexual romances and charecters. I remember several major episodes that were basically Riker finding a new gender bender romantic partner and screwing things up because of that.
One episode if I recalls, the character he got interested in on an away mission had to get gender reassignment surgery/mental reprogramming anyway to deal with the aborhent thoughts.

the addition of adding in homosexual characters and actors just for ratings, viewership, and sponsor ship is just a sick by product of the times. SO many shows have done that and simply gone missing from tv for good the following season..

The addition of gay characters has been done well in various shows. Barney Miller was notable for having non traditional characters. And the charectoers were done well. They were humans with normal problems.
One episode the recurring gay store thief steals some nice hand bags. When caught and questioned, hes asked why and replies "they looked nice". And hes only mocked as "what kind of moron steals a purse without a wallet in it"

And that's not how the new discovery has been promising. It was promised it would be a political addition of non hetero charecters. That means, homosexual sex in buckets, and guys running around in mini skirts demanding to be called "ms" and "honey". Basically bad show time porno shows.
gcib.gif
 
*headdesk*

Sweetie, if non Cis/Het characters and individuals make you feel weird, might want to just turn off the TV, the internet, and never go outside. I hate to break it to you, but they aren't inventions of television and books, they kind of exist in that big place outside your basement as well.
Ahhh, just because they exist doesn't mean we need to show them in TV or movies; Hollywood should only be portraying straight, white, christian men with that early 20th century trans-atlantic accent in new features. And if you encounter anyone who is not a straight, white, upper class male, you can always just pretend that they are.
/sarcasm

(granted i didn't read enough of the OP to see if he mentioned people of color or minorities or women, I'm just extrapolating)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top