Also, Abrams can point the camera anyplace he chooses and there is a 100% probability he'll catch lens flare.Abrams can point the camera anyplace he chooses, and with infinite parallel realities from which to choose, any sequence of events a screenwriter can think of will be happening somewhere, for him to film.
I was just curious...who and how would you bring a TNG character into the JJ-verse Trek for a one time cameo or role. I'm racking my head to figure out how and why, and the only thing I could come up with is after the explosion of the Scimitar, Data's head has been floating around in space for years, and when Spock creates the red matter and all, somehow Data's head goes into the black hole. It's stupid, I know but I'm trying my best to see how we could get a TNG character in new Trek outside of playing someone's distant relative, i.e. Colonel Worf.
That's a good point. In fact, it is SUCH a good point, that we now all know that you comment and expect us to read your comments, but you don't read ours - 'cause it's been made, in this thread, about a dozen times already.Since the timelines were supposed to be one and the same until the Narada's arrival on the day of Kirk's birth, and after the branching they share the common past still, Data's head is already in the alternate reality, under San Fransisco where it's been since "Time's Arrow"
Because, IMnshO, NONE of that would happen. The past that the DS9 crew came back to in that episode is not on the same branch of reality that is Star Trek 2009's future. And it is very VERY unlikely that ANY of the human DS9 crew will be born in anything approaching the same form. Even Arne Darvin, who may have already been born, is pretty unlikely to be assigned to the same mission to sabotage the grain - it would be more likely to be some other agent, if the mission even occurs in the same way at all.Why wouldn't Worf appear?
Why wouldn't Worf appear?
It's just as likely to happen as unlikely. There's no real reason to assume that in 100 years Ben Sisko will not be assigned to command DS9 with a Trill Science officer named Dax, a human Medical officer named Bashir, a Klingon Tactical officer named Worf.... well you get the point. Especially since its fiction and the only thing stopping it would be the author's desire.Because, IMnshO, NONE of that would happen. The past that the DS9 crew came back to in that episode is not on the same branch of reality that is Star Trek 2009's future. And it is very VERY unlikely that ANY of the human DS9 crew will be born in anything approaching the same form. Even Arne Darvin, who may have already been born, is pretty unlikely to be assigned to the same mission to sabotage the grain - it would be more likely to be some other agent, if the mission even occurs in the same way at all.Why wouldn't Worf appear?
Well, sure, if you want to be all meta like that.It's just as likely to happen as unlikely. There's no real reason to assume that in 100 years Ben Sisko will not be assigned to command DS9 with a Trill Science officer named Dax, a human Medical officer named Bashir, a Klingon Tactical officer named Worf.... well you get the point. Especially since its fiction and the only thing stopping it would be the author's desire.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.