So only 2 years after the Hobus incident. What is this “15 years ago” thing all about then? Insurrection was the only notable thing around him in 2374.It's 2389ish apparently, not 2399 as first advertised.
I originally thought it was 2399 too but then a while ago there was a comment about 20 years since one or another thing, which suggested 2389 (see for example https://trekmovie.com/2019/02/11/pa...eries-has-a-title-and-specifies-year-setting/). It could be nerd group think making a supposition seem fact without any real confirmation, and I'd like 2399 more than 2389.... Esp for the litverse's continuation.
We'll probably fine out for sure next week at Comic-Con.
But I think Patrick saying the 19 years after TV series was a mistake.
Vegas last year they said it was 20 years after Nemesis.
No reason to stop since the Picard show is still 10 further years ahead.
That’s in the dark timeline. This is the right one.Picard leaves the Enterprise in 2381 and retires in 2385 according to the Picard museum that was set up as a tie-in to the new Picard show. The current day date is 2399
Sadly, yes. An irritation I have with some recent novels such as Available Light is claiming to be set "seven years after" the Shinzon incident of Nemesis when previous novels have specified that Nemesis took place in November. It may be a minor issue, but from my perspective, happening earlier in the year before November 2386 fails to constitute "seven years".It's a very confusing comment, because Stewart says it's been exactly 19 years, as it has been in real life, since he last played Picard, on television. It's been twenty-five years since All Good Things aired, and seventeen years since Nemesis. Neither number fits, so it depends on how much weight you want to give to that "for the television series" caveat.
Dates are easily screwed up, anyway.
Sadly, yes. An irritation I have with some recent novels such as Available Light is claiming to be set "seven years after" the Shinzon incident of Nemesis when previous novels have specified that Nemesis took place in November. It may be a minor issue, but from my perspective, happening earlier in the year before November 2386 fails to constitute "seven years".
NoThat’s in the dark timeline. This is the right one.![]()
Ah, sorry. I confused the historian's notes of Hearts & Minds and Available Light with those of Armageddon's Arrow and Headlong Flight.My note reads, “late 2386, seven years...”
I opted for rounding, instead of saying “six years, X months, X days....” because that’s how we all generally tend to look at past events. That, and I’d rather avoid adding fuel to some of the more animated discussions about the chronicling of such things.
Got bored of waiting and bought the Kindle version. I’m 9% in and I’ve spotted the Doscovery reference. I was expecting it to be more subtle. I don’t know if she should be put on that list. From what we saw of her, she wasn’t that great of a captain.![]()
I know what Picard did was wrong but to me, I’ve always seen the person who controls the Enterprise is the actual leader of the Federation. The President is just a figurehead who does the boring stuff.
If the Enterprise captain feels like he/she needs to go, they go.
I also liked that Picard sat down with some of his junior officers and crewmen to explain why he participated in the ousting of President Zife, and his conversation with Crusher about his guilt over the event was powerful, especially when he compared it to losing the Stargazer or his assimilation by the Borg which was described as "victim(s) of circumstance" rather than perpetrator.
The other half of the book was dedicated to the investigation of Section 31's public revelation, as undertaken by Fleet Admiral Leonard Akaar, the Commander-in-Chief of Starfleet, and Phillipa Louvois, the Federation Attorney General, alongside and under the direction of the President of the UFP, Kellesar zh'Tarash. I liked all three of these senior Federation officials, and it was nice to finally get some face time with the new President (she was heavily involved in The Fall, but that was as an Andorian politician and then as a Federation Presidential candidate, but she's been largely off-screen since taking office).
I did have a question about her and her administration: given that President Bacco was assassinated and Ishan Anjar was temporarily in charge, how many of President zh'Tarash's staff are holdovers or did she appoint a whole new Cabinet (as Bacco did when she took over for Zife)? I recall Ishan retaining the services of Bacco's Secretary of Defense and/or Exterior during his brief Presidency but he'd appointed his own Chief of Staff (as has zh'Tarash).
However, when it came to the actual handling of Section 31's operatives within Starfleet, I'm not quite sure how I feel. From what I remember (and I could just be remembering it incorrectly!), Admiral Ross was never actually a member of S31, he merely endorsed their methods and looked the other way, knowing that they did the necessary evils in the shadows so that Starfleet and the rest of the Federation could operate freely and above board (of course, that could be precisely the kind of snow-job such operatives gave people like Ross, or that Ross gives to people like Dr. Bashir or Captain Sisko).
Who finds Nechayev the slightest bit likeable?
There's two more books in the "DestinyLit" Continuity so far, after Available Light, TNG: Collateral Damage, which came out last October, and VOY: To Lose the Earth, which is scheduled for this October. We also know of at least one more Novelverse book possibly in the works, David Mack has made a reference to a new book he's working on involving Data and Lal.Honestly, I read the Section 31 parts and skimmed the main plot. My main interest was the follow-up to Control and in the final installments (so far?) of the DestinyLit Continuity.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.