• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

TMP-DE fully restored in 4K…it’s about time!

Out of curiosity I loaded a scruffy low detail 3D model of a Sovereign class, cut a hole in the front of the bridge, and pointed a camera out. Seems like you wouldn't see the saucer but you might see a little bit of the deck below.
 
Interesting. I feel much the same.

These days, the fans are in charge. Directors and studio heads kowtow to their every outcry, which is how we get Star Wars IX: The Rise of Skywalker and Zack Snyder’s Justice League. Filmmakers like Rian Johnson are excoriated for daring to do something different and irreverent, and we’re stuck with bland, bloated Easter egg baskets designed by committee with all the creativity of a hostage negotiation.
 
Of course they listened to the fans with Star Wars and Justice League, they were the people writing and directing them. Rian Johnson is a big enough fan that he had a shelf of Star Wars books to use as research.
 
Interesting. I feel much the same.
These days, the fans are in charge. Directors and studio heads kowtow to their every outcry, which is how we get Star Wars IX: The Rise of Skywalker and Zack Snyder’s Justice League. Filmmakers like Rian Johnson are excoriated for daring to do something different and irreverent, and we’re stuck with bland, bloated Easter egg baskets designed by committee with all the creativity of a hostage negotiation.
That was the part of the essay I most strongly agreed with.

Interesting that the editorialist doesn't seem to realize his own characterization of his least favorite Trek movie (which I assume isn't Berman Trek enough for a lot of fans, or else doesn't have enough spaceship shots in it) pretty well exemplifies the kind of fan outcry that he then describes studios and directors (or as I would say producers' directors) as being held hostage to. But perhaps he was distracted by his own undeservedly-inspired jab at the increasingly "portly" state of the actors, as if that had anything to do with anything.
 
My gut reaction to the screencaps posted earlier is that the exterior V'Ger shots are now too bright. But I'll reserve judgment until I actually get to watch the thing in motion.

Kor
 
Just watched it and thought it looked and sounded great. The only obvious flaw is in the scene where Kirk/Spock/McCoy speak together in the lounge from 53:25 to 56:00. There's some very messy work done whenever any of the characters are standing in front of the background star field. Strange that this should look so bad when it seems like a pretty straightforward shot.

It's much more obvious in motion than in this screenshot:
r34Pg2U.png


Hoping to see it in a theater next month and definitely getting it on disc! :)

Edit: David cgc notes the same issue with the lounge scene and give a possible explanation.
The recent TC has cleaner shots than this. I have limited success in After Effects but if it's frame for frame the same, I might have a go at merging the two once the bluray comes out in September.
 
After the bit about "Ensign, the possibility of our returning from this mission in one piece...may have just doubled" and the cut to Engineering, we hear lines from Chekov that I don't ever remember hearing before. Did Walter Koenig record all new lines for this version?

Also, during the Epsilon IX scenes, I swear the voice heard from the Columbia (acknowledging orders to rendezvous with the Revere) is also brand new. Can anyone confirm?
 
Last edited:
As I understand everything I’ve read there were quite a few audio tracks that were supposed to be included in the film originally, but never made it because the film was to completion. But unlike when the DE was first created this time around they found a lot of those original missing audio tracks and put them back into the film as Wise originally intended.
 
I was recognizing a bunch of the background ADR from the script files in Robert Wise’s papers at USC. There’s like 30 pages worth of various lines for every main character AND every background actor on the bridge, Cleary in engineering, and others.
 
Those lines were found when they we're going through the material from the original production. They were meant to have been inserted at the time but they didn't have the time. None of it was newly recorded.
 
I've only jumped to a few shots to see the "remastered" effects as I haven't watched the DC before. I was wondering what they would do about the badly distorted hump on the primary hull when the landing party stepped out onto the upper surface of the saucer. Thought maybe they would just correct that curvature, but instead they replaced it with a dumb shot of the hex-cell walkway slowly materializing in front of the ship. Really? The unimaginably powerful, incredibly gigantic V'ger can't just pop out something that relatively small in the blink of an eye the way things suddenly appear in Lost in Space?
 
I've only jumped to a few shots to see the "remastered" effects as I haven't watched the DC before. I was wondering what they would do about the badly distorted hump on the primary hull when the landing party stepped out onto the upper surface of the saucer. Thought maybe they would just correct that curvature, but instead they replaced it with a dumb shot of the hex-cell walkway slowly materializing in front of the ship. Really? The unimaginably powerful, incredibly gigantic V'ger can't just pop out something that relatively small in the blink of an eye the way things suddenly appear in Lost in Space?
That was the intent in much of the original storyboards and concept art.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top