• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Strange New Worlds Starship Thread™

On screen in Star Trek III.

Erm... pretending to be a diagram of the Enterprise. Which looked totally different at the time.
With respect to the display you're talking about oh, I don't believe it had a NCC number on it.

So the Enterprise has a Disco S4-style crew lounge, with similar fireplace.

*5 years later*

KIRK: Tear it all down, I want a bowling alley instead!

And where's the swimming pool? I want a swimming pool like in the Franz Joseph 1701 blueprints.
 
Really bad hull texture - looks almost like a rasterized bump map.

Maybe it's not a final render. They used temp renders to get a few frames for the promos? I wouldn't think so...

hull.jpg
 
Perhaps They mean for the hull to look really beat up?
After all she not fresh out of drydock.
:shrug:

No. You've got hull plate joins that look like fissures drawn in crayon, there. It's the only close-up shot so far where the textures come off as badly as they did on STD, so maybe it won't be terribly noticeable most of the time.

The plates that are geometry, rather than textures (easy to tell them apart on this model, sadly) on the nacelles look pretty improved over the first version used on STD, though. The Discovery model improved during the first several seasons of that show, so maybe this one will as well.
 
Other way around, it had a number on the diagram but it didn't have a name.
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/NCC-1700
Except the graphic you linked was not what was displayed on the screen in the film - and in the actual scene as shown, you really cannpot make out the full NCC Registry Number - in fact it looks like '200'. (But yes, the graphic was taken, based on the USS Constitution page from the FJ Star trek Tech Manual.) - here's the actual scene in question:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Except the graphic you linked was not what was displayed on the screen in the film - and in the actual scene as shown, you really cannpot make out the full NCC Registry Number - in fact it looks like '200'. (But yes, the graphic was taken, based on the USS Constitution page from the FJ Star trek Tech Manual.) - here's the actual scene in question:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It looks like ‘700’ to me.
 
Except the graphic you linked was not what was displayed on the screen in the film - and in the actual scene as shown, you really cannpot make out the full NCC Registry Number - in fact it looks like '200'. (But yes, the graphic was taken, based on the USS Constitution page from the FJ Star trek Tech Manual.) - here's the actual scene in question:
The image on the M-A page is from TNG.

I missed Daniel talking about ST3. Though M-A does claim it showed up in ST3.
 
The image on the M-A page is from TNG.

I missed Daniel talking about ST3. Though M-A does claim it showed up in ST3.
But, the point is - did the audience see that full graphic legibly in a scene on screen? I say that because you could then canonize some of the ridiculous door tags they often placed on the TNG set BECAUSE they knew no one watching on TV would be able to read/see it in the final completed episode.
 
unknown.png
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top