Pretty sure only a Talosian would ask that...Are we sure they aren't fuk'n with our heads as we speak?
Pretty sure only a Talosian would ask that...Are we sure they aren't fuk'n with our heads as we speak?
Sorry, I meant less advanced. Looks like it came from the 50s not the 60s![]()
That's a great visual aid. Is there a version that includes the 2266-era USS Enterprise?![]()
Bumping up the scales of various ships would also go a long way into helping shots like these make a little more sense...
That's a great visual aid. Is there a version that includes the 2266-era USS Enterprise?
I quite like this scale. Bumping up the Constitution and Excelsior makes their interiors fit while also making the size jumps from Constitution - Excelsior - Ambassador smaller. It also still keep a noticeable progression because the Ambassador is so much chunkier at the same length.![]()
I found this, which seems to be the original. I didn't make it, so credit to whomever.
Seconded.And while we're here (I know, this is the starships thread) will we ever see anyone use a phaser 1? PLEASE?
I quite like this scale. Bumping up the Constitution and Excelsior makes their interiors fit while also making the size jumps from Constitution - Excelsior - Ambassador smaller. It also still keep a noticeable progression because the Ambassador is so much chunkier at the same length.
I may have a fat head on occasion, but I haven't had a shaved head since I was in my late twenties/early thirties.Pretty sure only a Talosian would ask that...
Well, in TOS it was the weapon that they wore under their uniforms.Seconded.
I always liked the idea of the phaser 1, it's too bad that it was decided in TNG to abandon them. I wonder if the original idea was to have our heroes armed with the scifi equivalent of a Derringer, but since no one watches Westerns anymore the concept was essentially forgotten (even though the prop designers keep including them in their phaser 2 designs).
There was no tracking. In any of the Berman shows. (Maaaaaybe ENT?) If you were firing a phaser it was a locked off shot. And it wasn't CGI.Or it was too small to show up on screen making tracking phaser shots difficult for CGI.
Might be easier now and more visible.
The production staff of Star Trek: The Next Generation found that the smaller 24th century version of the small hand phaser used in TOS was far too miniaturized to be seen on TV screens, and used it very infrequently. Besides calling it the "hand phaser", they also referred to it as "the cricket".
Same here.(I certainly did not have a big TV in 1987 and I could see it fine.)
Thank you, that is wonderful!![]()
I found this, which seems to be the original. I didn't make it, so credit to whomever.
Thank you, that is wonderful!
nonsense.Based on the graph, the easiest thing is that the TOS Connie is 442m long.
It's the Pilot version from 2245 to 2255, then gets refitted into the DSC/SNW version.
Refit to the TOS series version around 2260-2263.
Refit to Constitution II class in 2273.
All 442m long.
Those are nice, where'd you get them?Can't help you with the bridge, but I do have these. Both models are the same scale (1:1000
I built them. Kits purchased at various hobby shops.Those are nice, where'd you get them?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.