Dennis gets me ticked off on two things ... his flippant approach to debate and his tendency to waste hair.
Dude, I'm the Saudi Arabia of hair growth. I can afford to waste it.

Excuse me now whilst I go shave my palms.
Dennis gets me ticked off on two things ... his flippant approach to debate and his tendency to waste hair.
It looks like chimpanzee shit.
I just want to clarify that my use of a New Coke analogy was not meant to equate Trek with a sugary pop drink. I just wanted to say that sometimes companies do try new and different things with well known and traditional icons.
It just gets so much more dangerous with literary or cinematic properties since we all have such an emotional attachment to them. And I agree, quality is what is remembered not failure. That is why I am so open to the new film, if it works it will be a great boost to Trek. If it fails, everyone will laugh at Abrams for trying to monkey with greatness and people will look at back at TOS as the way it should always be. But I do praise Abrams for trying to bring new life into Trek.
oh yeah, what does a heated debate about decaying orbits have to do with the OP's point?
Warning for honesty, y'mean?
So confused that you've forgotten the part about where such discussions are properly conducted? Come on, guys -- you know the drill. Take it to PM; this is just cheap grandstanding.I'm a little confused by this one.
[..]
Lovin' that avatar Darth_Pinche.
Lovin' that avatar Darth_Pinche.
Yeah me too. This film was on when I first moved to Germany in 2004. It was ridiculous and really, really funny. Only their German was a bit hard to understand.
Anyway... people, we seriously need to chill. All of us.... or most of us anyway. The original post was really thoughtful and smart, although I don't share the feeling one hundred percent. But respect, Sam, well done. Shame it ended in a discussion involving chimpanzee shit.![]()
NOT THE SAME Berman-stamped (or likeBerman-stamped) THING.
That's one reason most posters are so excited about the new film---it's not the same Berman-stamped thing.
Note I had 'or likeBerman-stamped' there as well.
Note I had 'or likeBerman-stamped' there as well.
It's not "like" Berman-stamped, either. The Trek XI trailer was actually dynamic.
Read the rest of the sentence, it is about somebody in charge who doesn't understand or respect the material, not how exciting the trailer was or wasn't cut.
The trailer for WATERWORLD was dynamic too, but somebody didn't understand that ROAD WARRIOR wasn't going to work on the water, to the tune of 200 mil.
If not, on your own head be it. You've been warned.
If not, on your own head be it. You've been warned.
Ah crap. Looks like I'd better stock up on Echo Papa 607's.![]()
I know this might be a shitty way to kind of change the topic, but I wonder if anyone had the reverse effect from this trailer. Instead of the Sobaring effect that Sam described, I wonder if anyone got really drunk after watching it or something? Those would probably be interesting stories.
Ever think people will give both their money. Alot of people I've talked to are tired of the X-MEN right now so you never know how it will do. But I know Jackman has a big fanbase with the Drooling Masses.... OF WOMEN.....Just saw the trailer for Wolverine (part of one of those surveys at the mall; got two dollars for my time).
JJ's alleged Star Trek movie is in really deep trouble, because I don't see the ol' Canucklehead giving up the Number One slot at the box office without a major fight, and I don't think this turkey is up for it.
In other words, Wolverine looks damn good.
In another thread someone talked about modern audiences preferring to have their movies spoon-fed to them. And he was wrong about that.
Modern, flexible audiences can adapt and enjoy new versions of old stories or franchises.
Your display of intellectual inflexibility shows that you can't.
You and all those like you are actually the ones who want to be spoon-fed with the ever-same tasting, ever-same looking product.
That same-tasting shit is what so many folks on this board lapped up avidly from the late 80s up until early this century, ModernTrek (or as I prefer to call the nonDS9 part of that, CRAP!) and THOSE people whoe lapped that up are the ones who seem to be so happy about the Abrams ...
More of the same, more more more ... why can't YOU folks be happy with a few excellent things instead of a 1000 mediocre ones? You can spread out, WATCH OTHER SHOW, DO OTHER THINGS, in addition to seeing the show you like. If 'my kind' is complaining about what they're seeing, it is because we don't want to see the same-tasting shit -- or GL/imperial tasting shit -- with a TOS tag and arrowhead logo slapped on it. There's going to be other good SF out there on occasion, and I'll be watching for it, hoping for something between real ST TOS and FIREFLY -- which actually is a pretty big range for a variety of storytelling, NOT THE SAME Berman-stamped (or likeBerman-stamped) THING.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.