I understand, but it just seemed as if they were being very short sighted. I mean technology was racing at a rapid pace, and tho there may have been issues with storage expense in those days, but in the USA, there wasn't that attitude, at least I can still find all the honeymooners and Doby Gillis episodes..to me it just seems like that reasoning is a very convenient and diplomatic excuse.Patrick just had a great run, with brilliant stories, but because of moronic policy, a majority of his work was lost.
It's easy to say that now, but it was a completely different way of thinking back then. TV was ephemeral, there were no widespread reruns or Home Video releases, and storing the tapes cost money and took up a lot of space. What little - if any - sense of posterity there may have been wasn't deemed worth it. It's a great shame but there you go.
I can sort of understand their reasoning. They were running low on storage space, the BBC generally didn't do reruns, and vhs hadn't become a thing yet. Doesn't mean I'm any less pissed off about it though, and wish I had access to a time machine and a large truck.