This is only ridiculous if you have this attitude. Throughout the history of ST there have been things that were much more qualified to be described as ridiculous and yet were rationalized. Here most of your accusations can be easily explained by the time crystal and the huge amount of energy stored in the suit and the use of the technobabble already existing in the series. Nothing new in ST.
Not sure what "attitude" you're decrying... the attitude that stories should make logical sense and fit into continuity? Because this really is pretty damn ridiculous.
Note: I'm not saying the concept of a being with these powers is inherently ridiculous; Trek is full of beings with powers even more vast. I'm not even saying that concept of a being in a
suit with these powers is ridiculous. What I'm saying is that the concept of a suit with these powers being built by Federation scientists
in the 2230s is ridiculous, given everything we know about Trek technology from 50+ years of stories.
The nature of the Red Angel was a pretty interesting mystery for the first half of the season. (Not necessarily a great one, but at least an interesting one, and it provided the motivation for some good side stories along the way.) As soon as the show's creators moved it front and center, though, and provided an "answer" to that mystery, it was clear that the answer given blatantly failed to fit the context laid out earlier in the same season, and indeed just raised more questions than it answered.
At this point, the best speculation anyone can offer is that Mama Burnham somehow "upgraded" the suit with assorted future tech. Extensively. Somehow. On her own. While based in a future where all known sentient life and civilization has been exterminated. (And that still wouldn't explain how or why she chose the specific missions she did, much less why she chose to be so inscrutably mysterious to people who should have been natural allies.)
No, it is nothing new to Trek and this one is no more (and no less) offensive than any other. Mileage will vary on this point, but I find individuals objecting to specific magic tech rather odd, to say the least.
Again, I don't think anyone is objecting to magic tech
per se. But the
time, place, and manner in which magic tech is presented has an awful lot to do with how plausibly it comes across. The past couple of episodes of DSC have fumbled this badly. I can't imagine this is what was originally planned... which means that for the second season in a row, the show is screwing itself over by retooling its story partway through.
...the only thing elevating it to be 'worse' than any of the other stupid shit in franchise history is bias. Sorry.
What sort of "bias" do you imagine is at work here? No one has defended any of the examples of egregiously stupid technobabble from past eras of Trek. On the contrary,
@Rahul just upthread pointed out how widely disdained they are.
Or perhaps the whole thing was based off tech from the 31st century that found it's way to the 23rd.
So you're suggesting that in a secret research project based around the idea that history had been altered by future tech (to sum up what Leland said), they
used history-altering future tech? That's awfully meta, but I suppose I wouldn't put it past S31. On the other hand, were that the case, you'd really think Leland would've mentioned it along with the rest of the backstory... so I can't imagine it's what the writers had in mind. I really think they just expected viewers to take the explanation at face value, no matter how absurd it was.