With the Doctor saying "And didn't we have trouble with the prototype", implying clunkily that he was developing it with both of them. Season 25 uses sledgehammer tactics to try to force 'mystery' back into the show and it was pretty cringeworthy on first viewing in the 80s as well. Other elements helped rescue it, but some moments were
bad.
I generally find fiction set in other worlds where I'm drawn to their universe, which allows a lot more dramatic ideas to be utilized, which does include real life issues - that's inescapable. Compared to everything that has to be set on Earth - any show can do
that. Sci-fi can take the human condition and experiences and ideas and use them in so many more ways and I prefer its creativity and potential for it.
I've probably seen a lot more documentaries on HIV and AIDS than most, not just because I'm bisexual (which adds a layer of complexity that goes too far outside the scope of this discussion thread), but because of interviews with actual people suffering from it. It's not always a pleasant experience, unlike the invariably sanitized television and movie dramas and "bio-pics", which tend to do that often enough. It's honestly far more heart-shattering to watch those in real life discuss their real life interactions than any fictional drama "based on a real story" pretending to discuss what real people 40 years ago endured and nothing can begin to compare to a fictional drama. The main difference to me is that, certainly regarding HIV documentaries and interviews for example, those were recorded by people at the time directly and exist for everyone to directly learn from, at least from their experiences without the veneer of slick visual effects or polished scripts that might send a different message due to actor inflection or any other possible nuance. And I'll agree, there's a place for both real, fiction, fiction based on real story, and so on, but there's a line and for something as recent and as home-hitting as HIV, the phrase "keep it real" comes to mind. Nothing is more real than interviews with people who really have it and share their experiences directly. A drama can simulate or tell the messages indirectly, but it's still not the same thing as listening to the people in a true and fully nonfiction environment. I'd maintain there's potentially a big difference between fiction and nonfiction in general. Even fictional drama based on nonfiction is still put into "fiction" for legitimate reasons.
If nothing else, it'd be lovely if "Are You Being Served?" was a nonfiction documentary regarding human interaction and not a comedy with the occasional dramatic tinge that uses real life elements as a springboard to twist for induce jovial effect from its audience and nobody listens to people who sell clothes for a living, assuming any still do... but it's entertainment, not real life. For something serious, that real life aspect cannot be duplicated and I'm a sucker for shows that welcome me into their universe more than finding shows that try to be within ours, which is far easier to do. Which is a fine line in of itself, "Superman" (1978) is almost indistinguishable in some ways...
Thanks. : ) But I can readily concede in that I do tend to be baffling at times. Usually not deliberately.
I'll not disagree with that.