While I think it's cool that someone went in to clean up FX and such, the idea of re-editing scenes and replacing music cues sounds stupid and crosses an ethical line in my book.
Star Wars won the Oscar for editing and FX which Lucas (who was not credited with either) changed for the Special Editions. I find it interesting that most people's indignation starts and ends with who has the legal right to do something and not whether the act itself is actually right or not.
I find it interesting that you're making completely erroneous assumptions about me based on nothing.
I strongly disapprove of the Star Wars special editions for a host of reasons, not the least of which is that it disrespects the efforts of the craftsmen and innovators who toiled on the film at the time and created ground-breaking special effects. Much of that work has been callously tossed away.
The resulting film is not a "perfect" version of Star Wars because such a thing could never exist. Lucas and others could keep fucking with the movies every year since every year there are more and more technological advances.
But then the movie ceases being a single piece of art and becomes something cheap and temporary.
I think movies, like other works, should also stand as a testament to the time and place they were created and as a tribute to those who made them at the time.
Sure, we could go back and photoshop the Mona Lisa with modern technolog, but I can't imagine anyone would actually think that was a good idea.
In the case of star wars, the situation is mitigated only SOMEWHAT due to the fact that Lucas was the principle (but not the sole) creative force behind the films.
But what if he decides he no longer likes Harrison Ford's performance and wants to digitally tweak that somehow? No different than erasing old model work with modern (but soon to be outdated) CGI.