News The ongoing next Star Trek movie thread

[camdudetenger2018]

if the star trek kelvin verse movies kept going since 2009 and if they never had the many large gap years between star trek 2009 and star trek darkness then between star trek darkness and star trek beyond

there probley would have been 10 star trek kelvin verse movies by now

 

[M'Sharak]

if the star trek kelvin verse movies kept going since 2009 and if they never had the many large gap years between star trek 2009 and star trek darkness then between star trek darkness and star trek beyond

there probley would have been 10 star trek kelvin verse movies by now

IF the movies had each been made on a fanfilm production budget, and on a production timeline significantly tighter than 2-to-2 1/2-year turnaround seen in Trek movies previously, then sure, we might have seen 10 Kelvin Timeline movies between 2009 and now. Maybe more -- who knows?

If one ignores the mechanics involved in movie production, it's possible to imagine all sorts of impossible scenarios.

But those aren't the movies which were contracted by Paramount.

And this is a thread about a potential Star Trek 4, not about any of the things you said above.

If you wish to discuss absurd "if only they would'a" schemes of the type we've already seen dozens of times before, you're welcome to start a thread about that, but kindly refrain from injecting them into threads which are clearly not about that, 'K?