• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The One Thing You Could Change, TOS Edition...

I see Ilia, who now has a reason to be on the bridge and has her own chair, i.e. navigator, contributing on occasion to move the plot along, "Captain, I sense...<fill in the blank>." Two for the price of one. :techman:
Yes but also there is mention in the Phase II book that Ilia would also have been developed as an unofficial counselor whereas one of Chapel's areas of expertise was listed as psychotherapy. That's why I included them both on the list. It is also true that McCoy is a space psychologist as well of course.
 
That and her mini-skirt didn't cover her butt. :alienblush: She is also the only Starfleet woman to kill anyone on screen during TOS.

The only reasons why I regret the story being taken from Rand are that having their emotions hollowed out by the machine could have been a good way to kill off the Kirk/Rand frisson and it would have been cool to have Rand kill someone who isn't on her own team.

Henoch says that Noel was the only Starfleet woom to kill anyone on screen in TOS, but you say that it would have been good to see Rand kill someone not on Rand's team, making it sound as if Rand sometimes killed members of her own team. Is that the correct interpreation of your words?
 
Last edited:
QUOTE="Pauln6, post: 13522922, member: 16845"]The only reasons why I regret the story being taken from Rand are that having their emotions hollowed out by the machine could have been a good way to kill off the Kirk/Rand frisson and it would have been cool to have Rand kill someone who isn't on her own team.

Henoch says that Noel was the only Starfleet woom to kill anyone on screen in TOS, but you say that it would have been good to see Rand kill someone not on Rand's team, making it sound as if Rand sometimes killed members of her own team. Is that the correct interpreation of your words?
TMP!
 
Henoch says that Noel was the only Starfleet woom to kill anyone on screen in TOS, but you say that it would have been good to see Rand kill someone not on Rand's team, making it sound as if Rand sometimes killed members of her own team. Is that the correct interpreation of your words?
Huh? No.
 
Well, I suppose you could argue that the legal responsibility lay with Decker and Scotty for allowing use of the transporter while under repair, but the faulty sensor alone shouldn't have been the cause of the system failure. Maybe it was Keenser?
 
As short as the other mini-skirts are, Noel's is shorter.

Plus there's the camera framing where she's about to kick the technician into the elecrical panel and she pulls her knees up to her chest. Wonder how Roddenberry got that shot past the censors in the 1960s.
So many people have this preposterous notion that the 60s TV censors were so prudish. There were girls in bikinis on lots of shows in the same period, so any TOS miniskirt with their matching danger briefs was fine by the standards of the day.

It's really not about that for me. Not even close. It's the vibrancy in her face, her expressions. Her character was completely in the moment, willing to enjoy things. She was confident and worldly enough to be amused and have some fun, where Kirk would have intimidated most crew women into toe-the-line seriousness. She got saucy and mischievous with Kirk, and had the charisma to get away with it. That was sexy.
Somehow it always back to "sexy" where Noel is concerned.

The prostecution rests.
 
So many people have this preposterous notion that the 60s TV censors were so prudish. There were girls in bikinis on lots of shows in the same period, so any TOS miniskirt with their matching danger briefs was fine by the standards of the day.


Somehow it always back to "sexy" where Noel is concerned.

The prostecution rests.
Then the prosecution needs to unrest. Because there's something wrong with liking someone because they are sexy? And multiple posters have laid out multiple reasons for liking Noel.
 
Then the prosecution needs to unrest. Because there's something wrong with liking someone because they are sexy? And multiple posters have laid out multiple reasons for liking Noel.
Nope. In my 15 years on this board by far the majority of comments re the Noel character have done so with comments about her looks, her sexiness and oft accompanied by this emoticon. :drool:
 
Nope. In my 15 years on this board by far the majority of comments re the Noel character have done so with comments about her looks, her sexiness and oft accompanied by this emoticon. :drool:
1) And the problem with that is...?
2) In THIS thread you've been presented with multiple reasons.
 
Somehow it always back to "sexy" where Noel is concerned.

The prosecution rests.

If you want to drain all the joy out of life, a good place to start is to stigmatize the attractions we feel. Do some finger-pointing, some sneering. It's a necessary step on the road to that genderless utopia you dream of.
 
Yep. Buncha guys getting excited over seeing her panties...errrr....dancer briefs. :rolleyes:
As I and others have argued, that is not the only nor even the main reason nor even toward the top of list for liking Helen Noel. This seeing her panties things is such a red herring.
 
If you want to drain all the joy out of life, a good place to start is to stigmatize the attractions we feel. Do some finger-pointing, some sneering. It's a necessary step on the road to that genderless utopia you dream of.
Nope. I just happen agree with T'Bonz on this and after15 years of it I'm as sick of Helen Noel as I am arguments about if the bridge viewscreen points forward. :D

Straight guys who drool over a woman are neither a protected or persecuted class.
 
I'm as sick of Helen Noel
Perhaps when Noels makes a appearance in a thread you could disengage and seek involvement in a different thread?

As a separate matter, that Noels is the only woman in TOS to be shown killing an opponent during hand to hand combat is distinctive. Not quite the same as seeing someone at a console down in the phaser control room.
 
Last edited:
I would have had more variation in Starfleet ship design. Not every ship needs to be a Connie.
 
I would like to have seen more character development with the Klingons. More about their society and their honor. Kang was the most representative / best Klingon, although Kor wasn't bad, but Koloth was a fop.
On a side note...look how the Klingon Emblem is displayed sideways behind the Klingon Captain in Elaan of Troyius. I think this was the first time it was ever shown. I kind of like it that way - makes it look like a flying star.
3486385082-282cd6e047-b.jpg
 
On a side note...look how the Klingon Emblem is displayed sideways behind the Klingon Captain in Elaan of Troyius. I think this was the first time it was ever shown. I kind of like it that way - makes it look like a flying star.
It kind of looks like an airline logo. "Fly friendly Klingon space...at your own risk." :klingon:
 
I would like to have seen more character development with the Klingons. More about their society and their honor. Kang was the most representative / best Klingon, although Kor wasn't bad, but Koloth was a fop.
On a side note...look how the Klingon Emblem is displayed sideways behind the Klingon Captain in Elaan of Troyius. I think this was the first time it was ever shown. I kind of like it that way - makes it look like a flying star.
3486385082-282cd6e047-b.jpg

Yeah, it was the first time the Klingon symbol that came to be used throughout the rest of the franchise was seen onscreen. Regarding TOS Klingons I'd have explored their culture a little more. I know this was the late 1960s and making exotic enemies on a television series more three-dimensional wasn't a thing but I'd have at least established the name of the Klingon home planet and seen Klingon civilians and other non-soldiers.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top