Okie doke, I'll take a look.
Voyager should've been exactly as dark as BSG.
I don't think that's entirely unreasonable, although I don't agree with it. BSG was darker than your average Trek, but it was by no means the darkest show I've ever seen. I've just finished watching The Wire, and BSG has nothing on that show. When in BSG did a police officer use a set of false teeth to bite a dead homeless man's nipples in order to make it look like he was murdered in a bizarre sexual assault? When in BSG was a family murdered in front of a 4 year old boy because the father talked shit about a local gang leader?
BSG was a font of morality when compared to some other shows, and certainly when compared to many real-life situations.
And there very much should have been a mutiny. The mutiny episodes of BSG was possibly the best arc they did. I've said it before, but Chakotay should've been what Tom Zarek became (if maybe not quite so kill-happy).
Not much unreasonable here, the mutiny arc on BSG was great because the plight of the mutineers was understandable given the circumstances. And Tom Zarek wasn't even kill-happy, in the course of the show he is responsible for only 11 deaths that I can remember, and he paid the price for that.
I'd have been fine with as much Borg as we got, if they'd have distanced themselves from the Queen--a single enemy works fine, even better than multiple ones sometimes.
A very reasonable point of view, lots of people don't like the concept of a Borg queen.
People ought to have been flawed, people ought to have sometimes hated each other, and people ought to have died.
As people do. They shouldn't have hated one another just for the sake of hating one another, the conflict would have had to stem from the characters rather than being forced by the writers. If it had been handled well then I have no problem with it.
The whole last season of the show should've been Chakotay against Janeway, with parochial Maquis Chakotay wanting to just go home and patriotic Starfleet's Janeway wanting to finish the Borg once and for all.
I can understand his point here, but I've said for some time now that any mutiny story on Voyager should have happened in season 2 rather than dragging it out until season 7. Seven years would have been too long to keep that sort of animosity going. As for Janeway and Chakotay being at odds with one another, that happened a number of times (
Scorpion, Equinox), all he is saying is that he wanted it to last longer and not be forgotten about.
And they should have been finished, once and for all, in Voyager.
Which some believe they were, in
Endgame. I have no problem with Voyager managing to destroy the Borg threat, but it would have had to be done well and completely unlike the plots from
Unimatrix Zero and
Endgame.
And one or the other, Chakotay or Janeway, should have killed the other. Totally different from the Voyager we know, to be sure. But it's a conflict we can care about, because it's between two people we (are supposed to) like, that we have (theoretically, anyway) become friends with over six years.
This is the closest the post comes to being unreasonable, but even here I can see where he's coming from. When two characters that you like go head to head it can create some great drama, as it did in
Equinox before Chakotay gave up and towed the line. I don't know if one should have killed the other, it depends on how the story played out.
And there should've been a whole episode, dealing with the fallout of their return. Trials held. Reunions had. Maybe Janeway winds up like Tom Hanks in Castaway.
This is actually one of the biggest complaints that Voyager fans have against the finale, there was no resolution to the emotional journey they undertook.
Anwar said:
Most of the criticisms levelled against Voyager are reasonable and are based upon individual preference.
You forgot the IMO, because this sentence of yours is most definately not a fact.
It's not in my opinion, it is in everyone's opinion. I don't expect everyone to like or dislike everything that I do, and I don't judge people for it. If somebody criticises something as not being to their taste then it is not my opinion that they have a right to their opinion, it is a fundamental right bestowed upon the populations of free societies. If you want to claim that people don't have a right to an opinion in your view then you are endorsing something very dangerous indeed.
I had posted something offensive here, and after I had some time to sit back and cool off it was wrong to post it. So I apologize for what a wrote and erased.
I wasn't around at the time to see it so no harm done.
But basically you've got a responsibility to understanding that not everyone loves DS9, sees it as the pinnacle of Modern Trek, and that the writers involved are no Godsends.
But I do find this offensive. When don't I do that? When have I insulted someone for not liking DS9? You have made this claim against me numerous times, and when I've asked you to provide evidence of me acting that way you never do because you can't. It doesn't exist. I am not that person.