Yup. Designed around provoking an emotional response.Well, yeah. Ultimately S3 was basically just Lord Terry's fanfic gone wild.
Yup. Designed around provoking an emotional response.Well, yeah. Ultimately S3 was basically just Lord Terry's fanfic gone wild.
...how? No curve, no legs, no segmented exoskeleton...It looks like a gigantic -- and I mean gigantic -- shrimp in space.
E would've been nice. The Odyssey class was also used as the USS Verity in the PIC S1 Countdown comic already.Matalas acknowledged that the F was included as a nod to STO fans so as not to completely decanonise the Odyssey-class Enterprise, but he also mused on Twitter that maybe they should have just used the E instead – which honestly I would have preferred.
It's been over 6 months since that trailer was released, and it showed up in at least one more trailer already, so maybe the thread can be renamed now to say "The new Enterprise F"Thanks for digging it up. I've merged the threads.
Yup. Designed around provoking an emotional response.
Feel like having some fried Calamari now....how? No curve, no legs, no segmented exoskeleton...
Which isn't canon.The Odyssey class was also used as the USS Verity in the PIC S1 Countdown comic already.
I disagree.than using a hodgepodge of a Sovereign and an Akira class (which, let’s be real, Tourangeau’s design emulates and is not original at all.)
I disagree.
It looks slightly similar to those designs, because it was designed to be from the same era as those ships, but it doesn't borrow anything directly from them.
You have an odd definition of hodgepodge then. I don't see anything from either of those ships in the Odyssey, especially the Luna.And the Odyssey class doesn’t borrow anything directly from the Sovereign and the Intrepid classes either. Doesn’t change the fact that it looks like a hodgepodge of the two.
You have an odd definition of hodgepodge then. I don't see anything from either of those ships in the Odyssey, especially the Luna.
How does the Luna look anything like the sovereign?
Sure it is. That is the purpose of art.Not really.
I just don't understand why it's an issue if it is. Why wouldn't ships built around the same time look similar?
Sure it is. That is the purpose of art.
Which isn't canon.
Evoking a reaction can cover many aspects, so I am pretty sure evoking an emotional reaction can cover a lot of aspects of art.I’m pretty sure there is no singular purpose of art.