Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Still no in depth conversations or discussions. Why is that?
Still no in depth conversations or discussions. Why is that?
The merged and improved (?) KIC 8462852 thread
- Thread starter Dryson
- Start date
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Exoplanet Hunting
When looking for exoplanets perhaps we should be looking for the reflected light off of a planet as well. We know that space is absolutely cold all of the time or a value of 0. Reflected sunlight would therefore create a temperature region around the planet that was reflecting the light that would have a temperature value greater than zero and would remain a constant much like the constant from the light of a sun creates a temperature value around itself greater than zero. For example if a zone of space has a heat value of 7364728.0 where zero is the cold of space and the values above zero represent heat or reflected light any time that a value would remain the same while the values around it constantly change then the value that does not change must be a source of constantly reflecting heat or light which would possibly indicate a planet.
Example: 7364728.0 becomes 9305569.0 and then 1339872.0. The second value of 3 has not changed in three different data printouts but all of the other values around it have constantly changed to different heat and reflection values. Since there is not change at the second value then it must be a source of reflected light or heat.
After all if you are measuring the light reflection or heat from an object and the area around the central source of reflection or heat constantly fluctuates but the central value does not that would mean a constant state of reflection is present.
Planets would have various reflection tendencies determined by the planets surface, atmospheric gases, etc. the larger the value the more reflection the planet would produce which could be an icy surface or a gas planet. Lower values could be planets that would be similar to rocky or planets like Earth that would absorb the light of the star more so than reflecting it back.
Exoplanet Hunting
When looking for exoplanets perhaps we should be looking for the reflected light off of a planet as well. We know that space is absolutely cold all of the time or a value of 0. Reflected sunlight would therefore create a temperature region around the planet that was reflecting the light that would have a temperature value greater than zero and would remain a constant much like the constant from the light of a sun creates a temperature value around itself greater than zero. For example if a zone of space has a heat value of 7364728.0 where zero is the cold of space and the values above zero represent heat or reflected light any time that a value would remain the same while the values around it constantly change then the value that does not change must be a source of constantly reflecting heat or light which would possibly indicate a planet.
Example: 7364728.0 becomes 9305569.0 and then 1339872.0. The second value of 3 has not changed in three different data printouts but all of the other values around it have constantly changed to different heat and reflection values. Since there is not change at the second value then it must be a source of reflected light or heat.
After all if you are measuring the light reflection or heat from an object and the area around the central source of reflection or heat constantly fluctuates but the central value does not that would mean a constant state of reflection is present.
Planets would have various reflection tendencies determined by the planets surface, atmospheric gases, etc. the larger the value the more reflection the planet would produce which could be an icy surface or a gas planet. Lower values could be planets that would be similar to rocky or planets like Earth that would absorb the light of the star more so than reflecting it back.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Bigger fish to fry, old chap. Toodle pip!
Bigger fish to fry, old chap. Toodle pip!
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Can anyone here actually explain in depth what the following Kepler Search Results are related too?
http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/data_search/search.php?action=Search&ktc_kepler_id=8462852
Can anyone here actually explain in depth what the following Kepler Search Results are related too?
http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/data_search/search.php?action=Search&ktc_kepler_id=8462852
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Because you have a history of posting nonsense, and it's not worth responding to.
Half of your posts don't make sense because your word choices and sentence structure makes them very difficult to read.
The other half of your posts basically amount to, "I don't know, therefore aliens."
Any time anyone has ever called you out on your apparent lack of scientific understanding, you ignore it and start spouting even more nonsensical "theories."
I usually check out your threads because the topics can potentially be interesting, but actually reading through your posts is a chore. Your posts get described as "word salad" because it really feels like you just take a bunch of random words and toss them together. At the very least, you need to start proofreading before you hit "Submit."
Because you have a history of posting nonsense, and it's not worth responding to.
Half of your posts don't make sense because your word choices and sentence structure makes them very difficult to read.
The other half of your posts basically amount to, "I don't know, therefore aliens."
Any time anyone has ever called you out on your apparent lack of scientific understanding, you ignore it and start spouting even more nonsensical "theories."
I usually check out your threads because the topics can potentially be interesting, but actually reading through your posts is a chore. Your posts get described as "word salad" because it really feels like you just take a bunch of random words and toss them together. At the very least, you need to start proofreading before you hit "Submit."
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
What he said.
What he said.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Given the formulation of the question as posed, who could possibly answer it?
Given the formulation of the question as posed, who could possibly answer it?
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
The very problem with those reading through my posts is that they are not Twitter links of one two sentences and because readers have a short attention span they lose interest.
That's not my problem. Everyone learned how to read in school. But it's obvious that not everyone learned to be coherent but instead having nothing more than negative comments to posts.
The very problem with those reading through my posts is that they are not Twitter links of one two sentences and because readers have a short attention span they lose interest.
That's not my problem. Everyone learned how to read in school. But it's obvious that not everyone learned to be coherent but instead having nothing more than negative comments to posts.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
I like this idea. Keeps everything neat
I like this idea. Keeps everything neat
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure? / New Planets
New planetary find "best chance for life outside our solar system"
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/12/world...coveries-earth1114AMStoryLink&linkId=18693426
"GJ 1132b (is) arguably the most important planet ever found outside the solar system," Drake Deming, an astronomer at the University of Maryland said in an accompanying letter in the journal. He added that it's proximity will "allow astronomers to study the planet with unprecedented fidelity."
Found moving across a "red dwarf" star that is only a fifth of the size of the world's sun, the planet has a radius only 16% larger than Earth's, and has surface temperatures that reach 260 degrees Celsius. Although that's too hot to retain liquid water or sustain life as we know it, Tucker said it was cool enough to support some of the basic building blocks of life, and possibly support life forms like bacteria.
Could we therefore assume that if we find a Red Dwarf that a Sun similar to ours might close by with a habitable planet orbiting it?
I would have to think that our Sun at one time was much larger and possibly broke up into smaller suns before our Sun settled into place. If we take all of the gases that we have on Earth and determine which types of sun those gases would have come from then possibly our Sun pulled those gases from those fleeting suns into an orbit around it where a planet like Earth passing through the gas cloud was able to retain those gases that formed an atmosphere.
When those suns are found that would produce the same gases we have on Earth that are not found in our own sun then we might be wise to search the area around that sun for other suns that might be forming a chain with our Sun.
New planetary find "best chance for life outside our solar system"
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/12/world...coveries-earth1114AMStoryLink&linkId=18693426
"GJ 1132b (is) arguably the most important planet ever found outside the solar system," Drake Deming, an astronomer at the University of Maryland said in an accompanying letter in the journal. He added that it's proximity will "allow astronomers to study the planet with unprecedented fidelity."
Found moving across a "red dwarf" star that is only a fifth of the size of the world's sun, the planet has a radius only 16% larger than Earth's, and has surface temperatures that reach 260 degrees Celsius. Although that's too hot to retain liquid water or sustain life as we know it, Tucker said it was cool enough to support some of the basic building blocks of life, and possibly support life forms like bacteria.
Could we therefore assume that if we find a Red Dwarf that a Sun similar to ours might close by with a habitable planet orbiting it?
I would have to think that our Sun at one time was much larger and possibly broke up into smaller suns before our Sun settled into place. If we take all of the gases that we have on Earth and determine which types of sun those gases would have come from then possibly our Sun pulled those gases from those fleeting suns into an orbit around it where a planet like Earth passing through the gas cloud was able to retain those gases that formed an atmosphere.
When those suns are found that would produce the same gases we have on Earth that are not found in our own sun then we might be wise to search the area around that sun for other suns that might be forming a chain with our Sun.
Last edited:
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Because ignoring many thousands of man-years of peer-reviewed research into stellar structure and evolution is so outré?
Because ignoring many thousands of man-years of peer-reviewed research into stellar structure and evolution is so outré?
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Now, now. You guys just don't have a long enough attention span.
Now, now. You guys just don't have a long enough attention span.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure? / New Planets
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FFG1NqKzCg[/yt]
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FFG1NqKzCg[/yt]
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
It's more like we know when we'd be flogging a dead horse.
It's more like we know when we'd be flogging a dead horse.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
You are the least coherent one here. That is the problem.
You are the least coherent one here. That is the problem.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
I suggest people get back to discussing the topic.
And when I say "I suggest" I really mean I've got my claws out already.
I suggest people get back to discussing the topic.
And when I say "I suggest" I really mean I've got my claws out already.
Re: Has Kepler Discovered An Alien Megastructure?
Mmmmmm pasta..... Your sig makes me hungry Emillia
Mmmmmm pasta..... Your sig makes me hungry Emillia
Similar threads
