So did Joel’s daughter make it this time?
I figured I was going to get this response.It’s Depeche Mode. If you know, you know and if you don’t then you should probably listen to more Depeche Mode
One question - was it talked about if this season will cover the first game completely and will there be more seasons, where they have to branch off if they run out of game story, you know - the GoT fiasco.
Fantastic Intro to this show
Pascal is unsurprisingly good ( i can't remember him turning in a bad performance), the worldbuilding was excellent and you can see the big money onscreen they sunk into the show. Bella Ramsey will have an absolutely bright future in the acting business if she sticks with it, her GoT at times was a bit overacted but she was far younger there ( but still good), however you can see the few years of experience here.
I don't know the plot since i never played the game and fortunately didn't read a synopsis so i'm completely unspoiled but i guessed Ellie's secret as soon as they made an issue of it - she is apparently immune to the zombie fungus and that makes her a invaluable price and a high priority target once word comes out. I'm curious where the story goes but just by going by the game's reputation as one of the best stories ever done i have high expectations.
One question - was it talked about if this season will cover the first game completely and will there be more seasons, where they have to branch off if they run out of game story, you know - the GoT fiasco.
I don’t think a second season would be as popular.The season covers the entire first game. No official word of a second season.
I don’t think a second season would be as popular.
I didn't quite get the point of that. I understand that it was setting up the cordyceps outbreak, I just don't get why they set all the way back in the '60s. It would have worked just as well if it was something from 2003 that Joel or Sarah were watching.I actually thought the 60's scene was the best part of the show, especially with the casting in it.
Of course not, you literally can't tell the story without her dying.So did Joel’s daughter make it this time?
It was pretty much only there for the global warming reference. At that time it was acknowledged as a possibility, and I think scientists started finding evidence of rising CO2 levels in the 1950s, but it wasn't until around 20 years ago that the effects of global warming were really becoming noticeable. So the timeline fits with both the 1968 part of the prologue and the 2003 part (which was moved up from the game's prologue set in 2013), since it would also take time for the cordyceps fungus to adapt to the warming global temperatures instead of something that would happen immediately.I didn't quite get the point of that. I understand that it was setting up the cordyceps outbreak, I just don't get why they set all the way back in the '60s. It would have worked just as well if it was something from 2003 that Joel or Sarah were watching.
If anyone is interested I had watched this after the episode last night. It is rather remarkable how much was kept as well as how moving the beginning of the game was. (vid is opening to the game, no spoilers if you've watched first episode)
It was pretty much only there for the global warming reference. At that time it was acknowledged as a possibility, and I think scientists started finding evidence of rising CO2 levels in the 1950s, but it wasn't until around 20 years ago that the effects of global warming were really becoming noticeable. So the timeline fits with both the 1968 part of the prologue and the 2003 part (which was moved up from the game's prologue set in 2013), since it would also take time for the cordyceps fungus to adapt to the warming global temperatures instead of something that would happen immediately.
OK, I see now, thanks.It was pretty much only there for the global warming reference. At that time it was acknowledged as a possibility, and I think scientists started finding evidence of rising CO2 levels in the 1950s, but it wasn't until around 20 years ago that the effects of global warming were really becoming noticeable. So the timeline fits with both the 1968 part of the prologue and the 2003 part (which was moved up from the game's prologue set in 2013), since it would also take time for the cordyceps fungus to adapt to the warming global temperatures instead of something that would happen immediately.
I also should have said I think it was also just about setting up the danger of a potential fungal infection, since one on the scale presented in the show is considered pretty unlikely. Then I think the global warming thing was just a way to justify it, since I don't think the cause was ever explicitly laid out in the first game. (I haven't played the second, so I can't comment there.)OK, I see now, thanks.
One thing i was curiose about, the kid at the start of 2023 part, was he also immune? And where did he came from?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.